This article compares the economic status of working-age individuals with visual impairments with those with nonvisual impairments. It shows that the employment rates and mean household incomes were lower and the receipt of Social Security Disability Insurance was higher among those who were blind in both eyes than among those with less-severe visual impairments and those who were deaf in both ears.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoundJ., & BurkhauserR. V. (1999). Economic analysis of transfer programs targeted on people with disabilities. Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 3c, pp. 3417–3528). New York: Elsevier.
2.
BurkhauserR. V., DalyM. C., HoutenvilleA. J., & NargisN. (2002). Self-reported work- limitation data: What they can and cannot tell us. Demography, 39, 541–555.
3.
BurkhauserR. V., SmeedingT. M., & MerzJ. (1996). Relative inequality and poverty in Germany and the United States using alternative equivalency scales. The Review of Income and Wealth, 42, 381–400.
4.
FawcettG. (1996). Living with disability in Canada: An economic portrait.Gatineau, Quebec, Canada: Office for Disability Issues, Human Resources Development Canada.
5.
HoutenvilleA. (2002). Employment and economic consequences of visual impairment. In LennieP., & Van HemelS. B. (Eds.), Visual impairments: Determining eligibility for social security.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
KirchnerC., SchmeidlerE., & TodorovA. (1999). Looking at employment through a lifespan telescope: Age, health, and employment status of people with serious visual impairments.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
7.
MasseyJ. T., MooreT. F., ParsonsV. L., & TadrosW. (1989). Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1985–94. Vital and Health Statistics (Series 2, No. 110). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
8.
NagiS. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In PopeA. M., & TarloveA. R. (Eds.), Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention (pp. 309–327). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
TrupinL., SebestaD. S., YelinE., & LaPlanteM. P. (1997). Trends in labor force participation among persons with disabilities. Disability Statistics Report (No. 10). Washington, DC: National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research. West, J. (1996). Implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act.Oxford, England: Blackwell.