The aims of this survey of 4,939 clients of the Utah State Library for the Blind and Disabled were to determine who would use assistive technology (AT) in their public libraries, to profile factors influencing its use, and to evaluate the level of awareness of available services. Less than a quarter of the participants reported that AT was available in their public libraries, and a higher proportion of younger than older people would use it if it were available.
BehrmannM. M. (1994). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities. Intervention in School & Clinic, 30, 70–71.
3.
BerkowitzM. (1980). Reading with print limitations: Executive summary.Washington, DC: National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped.
4.
BertotJ. C., & McClureC. R. (2000, September). Public libraries and the Internet 2000: Summary findings and data tables.Washington, DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science [Online]. Available: <http://www.nclis.gov/statsurv/2000plo.pdf>.
5.
DavisB. (1997, June). Using teleworking to exploit the talents of Generation Xers, baby boomers, and matures. Telecommuting Review: The Gordon Report, 14(7), 3–7.
6.
GerberE., & KirchnerC. (2001, March). Who's surfing? Internet access and computer use by visually impaired youth and adults. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 176–181.
7.
HoltC., & HoleW. C. (1995). Assessing needs of library users with disabilities. Public Libraries, 34, 90–93.
8.
HoltC., & HoleW. C. (1998, November). Shared responsibility for training adults with disabilities to access information through technology: A library's experiences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Adult and Continuing Education, Phoenix.
9.
KayeH. S. (2000). Computer and Internet use among people with disabilities (Disability Status Report No. 13). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
10.
LazzaroJ. J. (1999). Helping the Web help the disabled. IEEE Spectrum, 36(3), 54–59.
11.
MendleJ. (1995). Library services for persons with disabilities. Reference Librarian, 23(49–50), 105–121.
12.
MyersJ. P. (1989, February 23). New generation of computer literacy. SIGCSE Bulletin, 21, 177–181.
13.
National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped. (2001, March 15). Eligibility of blind and other physically handicapped persons for loan of library materials (Online). Available: <http://www.loc.gov/nls/eligible.html>.
14.
PoulsonM. (1994). Library programs for children with disabilities: A survey of Missouri Public Libraries [Abstract]. Unpublished master's degree thesis, Kent State University, Kent, OH. (ERIC Documentation Service No. 389344).
15.
Utah State Library Division. (2001). Utah Public Library Service: 2000 annual report.Salt Lake City: Author.
16.
Utah State Library for the Blind and Disabled (USLB). (2001). Potential users of the Utah State Library for the Blind and Disabled. Unpublished report.
17.
ValenzaJ. K. (2000, fall). Surfing blind. Library Journal Netconnect, 34–36.
