Initial reading speeds across grades show points at which children with low vision are at risk of developing low literacy skills. Outcome group measures showed that children who received optical devices increased their silent reading speeds and comprehension rates. Findings indicate the provision of optical devices offer a benefit for deciphering text but not for the mechanics of reading.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarragaN. C. (1964). Increased visual behavior in low vision children (Research Series No. 13). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
2.
BurnsP. C., & RoeB. D. (1993). Burns and Roe Informal Reading Inventory: Preprimer to twelfth grade (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
CarverR. P. (1989). Silent reading rates in grade equivalents. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 158–161.
4.
CornA. L., & KoenigA. J. (2002). Literacy for students with low vision: A framework for delivering instruction. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 305–321.
5.
CornA. L., WallR. S., & BellJ. K. (2001). Impact of optical devices on reading rates and expectations for visual functioning of school-age children and youth with low vision. Visual Impairment Research, 2, 33–41.
6.
D'AndreaF. M., & FarrenkopfC. (2000). Looking to learn: Promoting literacy for students with low vision.New York: AFB Press.
7.
GardnerL., & CornA. L. (1984). Low vision topics of concern. In SchollG. (Ed.), Quality services for blind and visually impaired students: Statements of position.Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Students. Also published in DVH Newsletter, 27, 11–18.
8.
GardnerL., & CornA. L. (n.d., Ratified 1991). Low vision: Access to print. In Statements of position.Reston, VA: Division for the Visually Handicapped, Council for Exceptional Children.
9.
GoodrichG. L., & SowellV. M. (1996). Low vision: A history in progress. In CornA. L., & KoenigA. J. (Eds.), Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives (pp. 397–414). New York: AFB Press.
10.
HathawayW. P. (1959). Education and health of the partially seeing child (rev. ed. by F. M. Foote, D. Bryan, & H. Gibbons). New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
International Society for Low Vision Research and Rehabilitation. (1999). Guide for the evaluation of visual impairment.San Francisco: Pacific Vision Foundation.
12.
KoenigA. J. (1996). Selection of learning and literacy media for children and youths with low vision. In CornA. L., & KoenigA. J. (Eds.). Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives.New York: AFB Press.
13.
KoenigA. J., & HolbrookM. C. (1995). Learning media assessment of students with visual impairments: A resource guide for teachers.Austin: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
14.
KoenigA. J., & RossD. B. (1991). A procedure to evaluate the relative effectiveness of reading in large and regular print. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 198–204.
15.
LaytonC. A. (1994). Effects of repeated readings for increasing reading fluency in elementary students with low vision (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(01), 70A.
16.
Policy guidance on educating blind and visually impaired students. (2000). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
17.
PughG. S., & ErinJ. (Eds.). (1999). Blind and visually impaired students: Educational service guidelines.Watertown, MA: Hilton/ Perkins Foundation, Perkins School for the Blind.
