This study used the Twenty Statements Test (TST), a locus of control test, and open-ended questions to elicit responses from 16 college students who were blind or had low vision. A generally positive view of self emerged, but negative TST responses focusing on disability also occurred and sometimes were associated with deteriorating vision loss and recency of onset. Locus-of-control responses were highly external across the group.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldJ., & NicholsonN. (1991). Construing of self and others at work in the early years of corporate careers. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 12, 621–639.
2.
BausS. (1999). Commentary: Psychological aspects of visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 17, 41–44.
3.
BondM. H., & CheungT. (1983). College students’ spontaneous self-concept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153–171.
4.
Chase-LansdaleP. L., CherlinA. J., & KiernanK. E. (1995). The long-term effects of parental divorce on the mental health of young adults: A developmental perspective. Child Development, 66, 1614–1634.
5.
ConrodB. E., & OverburyO. (1999). The effectiveness of perceptual training and psychosocial counseling in adjustment to the loss of vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92, 464–482.
6.
DoddsA. (1993). Rehabilitating blind and visually impaired people: A psychological approach.London: Chapman & Hall.
7.
DoiseW., & PalmonariA. (1984). Social interaction in individual development.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
FurnhamA., & SteeleH. (1993). Measuring locus of control: A critique of general, children's, health- and work-related locus of control questionnaires. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 443–479.
9.
GarnerS. (1994). Visual impairment and identity. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nottingham.
10.
HagemoserS. D. (1996). The relationship of personality traits to the employment status of persons who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 134–144.
11.
HinkleD. E., WiersmaW., & JursS. G. (1982). Basic behavioral statistics.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12.
HullJ. (1990). Touching the rock: An experience of blindness.New York: Pantheon Books.
13.
KarlssonJ. S. (1999). Self-reports of psychological distress in connection with various degrees of visual impairment, Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92, 483–490.
14.
KellyG. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs.New York: W. W. Norton.
15.
KirchnerC., McBroomL. W., NelsonK. A., & GravesW. H. (1992). Lifestyles of employed legally blind people: A study of expenditures and time use (Technical report). Mississippi State: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Blindness and Low Vision, Mississippi State University.
16.
KuusistoS. (1998). Planet of the blind.London: Faber & Faber.
17.
LandS. L., & VinebergS. E. (1965). Locus of control in blind children. Exceptional Children, 31, 257–260.
18.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis.London: Sage.
20.
MorseJ. L. (1983). Psychosocial aspects of low vision. In JoseR. T. (Ed.), Understanding low vision (pp. 43–54). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
21.
MusgroveF., MiddletonR., & HawesP. (1977). The world of the blind: A supernor-mality. In Margins of the mind (pp. 109–134). London: Methuen.
22.
OaklandT., BannerD., & LivingstonR. (2000). Temperament-based learning styles of visually impaired students. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94, 26–33.
23.
ReesA., & NicholsonN. (1994). The Twenty Statements Test. In CassellC., & SymonG. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organisational research (pp. 37–54). London: Sage.
24.
ReidA. H. (1997). The eye and I: Or psychological aspects of blindness. Unpublished manuscript, Liff Hospital, Royal Dundee, Scotland.
25.
RotterJ. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), Whole No. 609.
26.
RoyA. W. N., DimigenG., & TaylorM. (1996). Types of supportive intervention sought by visually impaired graduates to assist their transition from education to employment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 14, 66–70.
27.
RoyA. W. N., DimigenG., & TaylorM. (1998). The relationship between social networks and the employment of visually impaired college graduates. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92, 423–432.
28.
SacksS. Z. (1996). Psychological and social implications of low vision. In CornA. L., & KoenigA. J. (Eds.), Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives (pp. 26–42). New York: AFB.
29.
SimkissP., GarnerS., & DrydenG. (1998). What next? The experience of transition.London: Post 16 Policy Unit, Royal National Institute of the Blind.
30.
TamS. F., & WatkinsD. (1997). Development and validation of a self-concept questionnaire for Hong Kong Chinese adults who have physical disability. Social Behavior and Personality, 25, 1–12.
31.
TuttleD. W. (1984). Self-esteem and adjusting with blindness.Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
32.
WatkinsD., YauJ., DahlinB., & WondimuH. (1997). The Twenty Statements Test: Some measurement issues. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 626–633.
33.
ZurcherL. A. (1977). The mutable self: A self-concept for social change.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
