This article reports on a descriptive study of standards and criteria for competence in braille literacy within teacher preparation programs and the specific role played in the achievement of proficiency in braille literacy by university teacher preparation programs in blindness and visual impairment. It contains a summary of the need for such research, historical background, research methods, and a discussion of standards and implications for personnel preparation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllmanC. B., & LewisS. (1996). Content validity of the National Literary Braille Competency Test. RE:view, 28, 103–112.
2.
AshcroftS. C., HendersonF., SanfordL., & KoenigA. (1994). New programmed instruction in braille (2nd ed.). Nashville, TN: SCALARS.
3.
BloomK., & ShuellT. J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 245–248.
4.
Council of Executives of American Residential Schools for the Visually Handicapped. (1990). Literacy for blind and visually impaired school-age students. RE:view, 22, 159–163.
5.
CraigR. (1987). Learning the Nemeth braille code.Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
6.
DorfM. (1984). Instruction manual for braille transcribing (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Library of Congress
7.
FishmanE. J. (1968). Massed versus distributed practice in computerized spelling drills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 290–296.
8.
JohnsonL. (1989). The importance of braille for adults. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 285–286.
9.
MullenE. A. (1990). Decreased braille literacy: A symptom of a system in need of reassessment. RE:iview, 22, 164–169.
10.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (1997). Training educators to work with students who are blind or visually impaired.Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
11.
National Federation of the Blind. (1995, August–September). Braille literacy, braille texts, and braille bills. Braille Monitor, pp. 481–489.
12.
National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped Braille Development Section. (1996, February). Status of the National Literary Braille Competency Test. Braille Monitor, pp. 87–88.
13.
RappD. W., & RappA. J. (1992). A survey of the current status of visually impaired students in secondary mathematics. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 115–117.
14.
RexE. J. (1989). Issues related to literacy of legally blind learners. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 306–313.
15.
SilbermanR. K., CornA.L., & SowellV. M. (1989). A profile of teacher educators and the future of their personnel preparation programs for serving visually handicapped children and youth. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 150–155.
16.
SpunginS. J. (1989). Braille literacy: Issues for blind persons, families, professionals and producers of braille. Paper presented at the National Convention of the National Federation of the Blind, Denver.
17.
StephensO. (1989). Braille—Implications for living. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 288–289.
18.
WittensteinS. H. (1993). Braille training and teacher attitudes: Implications for personnel preparation. RE:view, 25, 103–111.
19.
WittensteinS. H. (1994). Braille literacy: Preservice training and teachers’ attitudes. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 88, 516–524.
20.
WormsleyD. P., & D'AndreaF. M. (1997). Instructional strategies for braille literacy.New York: AFB Press.
21.
ZemkeR., & ZemkeS. (1981, June). 30 Things we know for sure about adult learning. Training, pp. 45–46, 48, 52.
