Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) causes restriction of the visual field, progressive vision loss, and night blindness. This article presents an overview of the current management options for O&M and describes the scientific and mobility research on RP that is relevant to the work of O&M instructors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderR. K., DerlackiD. J., & FishmanG. A. (1992). Contrast thresholds for letter identification in retinitis pigmentosa. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 33, 1846–1852.
2.
BaileyI. L. (1978). Prismatic treatment for field defects. Optometric Monthly, 38, 99–107.
3.
BarragaN. C. (1970). Teachers’ guide for the development of visual learning abilities and utilization of low vision.Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
4.
BarragaN. C., & MorrisJ. E. (1980). Program to develop efficiency in visual functioning.Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
5.
BersonE. L., MehaffeyL., & RabinA. R. (1974). A night vision pocketscope for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Archives of Ophthalmology, 91, 495–500.
6.
BrilliantR. L., AppelS. D., & RuggieroR. J. (1987). The amorphic Fresnel prism trioptical system. In Low Vision Principles and Applications: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Low Vision, University of Waterloo (pp. 208–215). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
CohenJ. M. (1992). An overview of enhancement techniques for peripheral field loss. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 63, 60–70.
8.
CrattyB. J., & SamsT. A. (1968). The body-image of blind children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
9.
DavidsonB., EcholsC., & JoseR. (1976). The development of the generation II as an aid for patients with retinitis pigmentosa and night blindness. Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 53, 88–94.
10.
DrasdoN. (1976). Visual field expanders. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 53, 464–467.
11.
DrasdoN., & MurrayI. J. (1978). A pilot study of the use of visual field expanders. British Journal of Physiological Optometry, 32, 22–29.
12.
EdwardsA. S. (1946). Body sway and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 526–535.
FerraroJ., & JoseR. T. (1983). Training programs for individuals with restricted fields. In JoseR. (Ed.), Understanding low vision (pp. 363–376). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
15.
FirthM. J. (1979). The use of field expanders for patients with pigmentary degeneration of the retina. Australian Journal of Optometry, 62, 441–443.
16.
FrostigM., & HorneD. (1964). The Frostig program for the development of visual perception: Teacher's guide.Chicago: Follett.
17.
GadbawP. D., FinnW. A., DolanM. T., & De l'AuneW. R. (1976). Parameters of success in the use of Fresnel prisms. Review of Optometry, 113(12), 41–43.
18.
GeruschatD. R., & De l'AuneW. (1989). Reliability and validity of orientation and mobility instructor observations. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 457–460.
19.
GeruschatD. R., DeremeikJ., & WhitedS. (1999). Head-mounted displays: Are they practical for school-aged children?Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 93, 485–497.
20.
GeruschatD. R., & SmithA. J. (1997). Low vision and mobility. In BlaschB. B., WeinerW. R., & WelshR. L. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (2nd ed., pp. 60–103). New York: AFB Press.
21.
GeruschatD. R., TuranoK. A., & StahlJ. W. (1998). Traditional measures of mobility performance and retinitis pigmentosa. Optometry and Vision Science, 75, 525–537.
22.
GottliebD. D., FreemanP., & WilliamsM. (1992). Clinical research and statistical analysis of a visual field awareness system. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 63, 581–588.
23.
HaymesS., GuestD., HeyesA., & JohnstonA. (1994). Comparison of functional mobility performance with clinical vision measures in simulated retinitis pigmentosa. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 442–453.
24.
HaymesS., GuestD., HeyesA., & JohnstonA. (1996). Mobility of people with retinitis pigmentosa as a function of vision and psychological variables. Optometry and Vision Science, 73, 621–637.
25.
HillE. W. (1981). The Hill performance test of selected positional concepts.Chicago: Stoelting.
26.
HoeftW. W. (1980). The management of visual field defects through low vision aids. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 51, 863–864.
27.
HoeftW. W., FeinbloomW., BrilliantR., GordonR., HollanderC., NewmanJ., NovakE., RosenthalB., & VossE. (1985). Amorphic lenses: A mobility aid for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 62, 142–148.
28.
HolmO. C. (1970). A simple method for widening restricted visual fields. Archives of Ophthalmology, 84, 611–612.
29.
HooverK. L. (1983). Visual acuity with the ITT night vision aid for patients with night blindness. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 60, 762–768.
30.
JoseR. J., & SmithA. J. (1976). Increasing peripheral field awareness with Fresnel prisms. Review of Optometry, 113, 33–37.
31.
JoseR. J., SpitzbergL. A., & KuetherC. L. (1989). A behind the lens reversed (BTLR) telescope. Journal of Vision Rehabilitation, 3(2), 37–46.
32.
KennedyW. L., RostenJ. G., YoungL. M., CiuffredaK. J., & LevinM. I. (1977). A field expander for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: A clinical study. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 54, 744–755.
33.
KozlowskiJ. M., MainsterM. A., & AvilaM. P. (1985). Negative lens field expander for patients with concentric field constriction. Archives of Ophthalmology, 102, 1182–1184.
34.
KrefmanR. A. (1981). Reversed telescopes on visual efficiency scores in field restricted patients. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 58, 159–162.
35.
LongR. G., RieserJ., & HillE. (1990). Mobility in individuals with moderate visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 111–118.
36.
MakiB. E., HollidayP. J., & TopperA. K. (1994). A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. Journal of Gerontology, 49, M72–M84.
37.
MancilR., & GeruschatD. R. (1994). Final report: Evaluating the efficacy of a peripheral vision expander system (Project C92-466AP). Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs.
38.
MarmorM. F., AultC., & ShamlianR. B. (1980). Wide-field high-intensity lantern, an affordable night mobility aid. Ophthalmology, 87, 216–217.
39.
MatronJ., & BaileyI. (1982). Visual factors and orientation—Mobility performance. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 59, 413–426.
40.
MassofR. W., & FinkelsteinD. (1987). A two-stage hypothesis for the natural course of retinitis pigmentosa. Advances in the Biosciences, 62, 29–58.
41.
MehrE. B., & QuillmanR. D. (1979). Field “expansion” by use of binocular full-field reversed 1.3x telescopic spectacles: A case report. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 56, 446–450.
42.
MorrisetteD. L., GoodrichG. L., & MarmorM. F. (1985). A study of the effectiveness of the wide-angle mobility light. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 79, 109–111.
43.
PaulusW. M., StraubeA., & BrandtT. (1984). Visual stabilization of posture: Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. Brain, 107, 1143–1163.
44.
RossD. A., & MancilG. L. (1997). Design and evaluation of liquid crystal dark-adapting eyeglasses for persons with low vision. Optometry and Vision Science, 74, 128.
45.
ShullL. E., & KuykT. (1990). Wide-angle mobility light (WAML) follow-up. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 78–79.
46.
SmithA. J., & GeruschatD. R. (1983). Functional evaluation and training techniques in the use of Fresnel prisms for individuals with restricted visual fields. In Low Vision Research and Training Center final report (NIHR Grant G008200040, pp. C61–C615.) Philadelphia: Pennsylvania College of Optometry.
47.
SmithA. J., & O'DonnellL. (1991). Beyond arm's reach: Enhancing distance vision.Philadelphia: Pennsylvania College of Optometry.
48.
SwannP. G. (1974). Extending the restricted visual field. Australian Journal of Optometry, 57, 299–305.
49.
SzlykJ. P., FishmanG. A., AlexanderK. R., RevelinsB. I., DerlackD. J., & AndersonR. J. (1997). Relationship between difficulty in performing daily activities and clinical measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Archives of Ophthalmology, 115, 53–59.
50.
SzlykJ. P., SeipleW., & XieW. (1995). Symmetry discrimination in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Vision Research, 35, 1633–1640.
51.
TemmeL. A., MainoJ. H., & NoellW. K. (1985). Eccentricity perception in the periphery of normal observers and those with retinitis pigmentosa. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 62, 736–743.
52.
TuranoK. A., DagnelieG., & HerdmanS. J. (1996). Visual stabilization of posture in persons with central field loss. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 37, 1483–1491.
53.
TuranoK. A., GeruschatD. R., & StahlJ. W. (1998). Mental effort required for walking: Effects of retinitis pigmentosa. Optometry and Vision Science, 75, 879–886.
54.
TuranoK. A., GeruschatD. R., StahlJ. W., & MassofR. W. (1999). Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visiual Science, 40, 865–877.
55.
TuranoK. A., HerdmanS. J., & DagnelieG. (1993). Visual stabilization of posture in retinitis pigmentosa and in artificially restricted visual fields. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 34, 3004–3010.
56.
TuranoK. A., RubinG. S., HerdmanS. J., CheeE., & FriedL. P. (1994). Visual stabilization of posture in the elderly: Fallers vs. nonfallers. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 761–769.
