This comparison of the behavioral and emotional adaptation of elderly visually impaired and sighted people found that age-related visual impairment was associated with other forms of substantial loss that increased over a six-year period. The results underscore the need for the earliest possible intervention and rehabilitation to prevent psychosocial harm to elderly people who experience severe vision loss after a lifetime of seeing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonB., & PalmoreE. (1974). Longitudinal evaluation of ocular function. In PalmoreE. (Ed.), Normal aging II (pp. 24–32). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
BranchL. G., HorowitzA., & CarrC. (1989). The implications for everyday life of incident self-reported visual decline among people over age 65 living in the community. The Gerontologist, 29, 359–365.
3.
CarpF. M. (1987). Environment and aging. In StokolsD. & AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 330–360). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
HeckhausenJ., & SchulzR. (1995). A lifespan theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284–304.
5.
HeinemannA. W., ColorezA., FrankS., & TaylorD. (1988). Leisure activity participation of elderly individuals with low vision. The Gerontologist, 28, 181–184.
6.
HiattL. G. (1987). Designing for the vision and hearing impairments of the elderly. In RegnierV. & PynoosJ. (Eds.), Housing the aged (pp. 341–371). New York: Elsevier.
7.
HorowitzA. (1995). Aging, vision loss, and depression: A review of the research. Aging & Vision News, 7, 1,6,7.
8.
HorowitzA., TeresiJ. A., & CasselsL. A. (1991). Development of a vision screening questionnaire for older people. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 12, 37–56.
9.
LaforgeR. G., SpectorW. D., & SternbergJ. (1992). The relationship of vision and hearing impairment to one-year mortality and functional decline. Journal of Aging and Health, 4, 126–148.
10.
LawtonM. P. (1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89.
11.
LawtonM. P. (1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaption of older people. In LawtonM. P., WindleyP. G., & ByertsT. O. (Eds.), Aging and the environment (pp. 33–59). New York: Springer.
12.
LawtonM. P. (1985). The elderly in context: Perspectives from environmental psychology and gerontology. Environment and Behavior, 77, 501–519.
13.
LongR. G. (1995). Housing design and persons with visual impairment: Report of focus-group discussions. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 59–69.
14.
PfeifferE. (1978). The OARS methodology— A manual (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development.
15.
ResnickH. E., FriesJ. F., & VerbruggeL. M. (1997). Windows to their world: The effect of sensory impairments on social engagement and activity time in nursing home residents. Journal of Gerontology, Social Sciences, 52B, S135–S144.
16.
RudbergM. A., FurnerS. E., DunnJ. E., & CasselC. K. (1993). The relationship of visual and hearing impairments to disability: An analysis using the Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 48, M261–265.
17.
SchneeklothU., & PotthoffP. (1993). Hilfe und Pflegebedürftige in privaten Haushalten [Care needs in private households]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
18.
SchulzR. & HeckhausenJ. (1999). Aging, culture, and control: Setting a new research agenda. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, P139–P145.
19.
SmithJ., FleesonW., GeiselmannB., SettersenR., & KunzmannU. (1999). Sources of well-being in very old age. In BatesP. B. & MayerK. U. (Eds.), The Berlin Aging Study (pp. 450–471). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20.
StaudingerU. M., FreundA. M., LindenM., & MaasI. (1999). Self, personality, and life regulations: Facets of psychological resilience in old age. In BaltesP. B. & MayerK. U. (Eds.) The Berlin Aging Study (pp. 302–328). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21.
StaudingerU. M., MarsiskeM., & BaltesP. B. (1995). Resilience and reserve capacity in later adulthood: Potentials and limits of development across the life span. In CicchettiD. & CohenD. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (Vol. 2, pp. 801–847). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22.
WahlH.-W, HeylV., OswaldF., & WinklerU. (1998). Sehbeeinträchtigung im Alter: eine doppelte Belastung? [Visual impairment in old age: A double burden?]. Der Ophthalmologe, 95, 389–399.
23.
WahlH.-W., & OswaldF. (2000). The person-environment perspective of visual impairment. In SilverstoneB., LangM. A., RosenthalB., & FayeE. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision and rehabilitation (Vol. 2, pp. 1069–1087). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
WahlH.-W., OswaldF., & ZimprichD. (1999). Everyday competence in visually impaired older adults: A case for person-environment perspectives. The Gerontologist, 39, 140–149.
25.
WahlH.-W., SchillingO., OswaldF., & HeylV. (1999). Psychosocial consequences of age-related visual impairment: Comparison with mobility-impaired older adults and long-term outcome. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, P304–P316.
26.
WestS. K., MunozB., RubinG. S., ScheinO., Bandeen-RocheK., TegerS., GermanP. S., FriedL. P., & the SEE Project Team. (1997). Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, 72–82.
