In this study, a system was designed for monitoring learning progression and observing how an instructor directs a student's attention toward goals, such as landmarks and shorelines, on mobility routes. The aim was to determine the activities, or skills, that correspond to major steps in mobility route learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DreyfusH. L., & DreyfusS. E. (1986). Why skills cannot be represented by rules. In SharkeyN. E. (Ed.), Advances in cognitive science J (pp. 315–335). Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.
2.
HatanoG., & InagakiK. (1992). Desituated cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In LightP. & ButterworthG. (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 115–133). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
3.
JacobsonW. H. & BradleyR. H. (1997). Learning theory and teaching methodologies. In BlaschB. B., WienerW. R., & WelshR. L. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (pp. 359–382). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
4.
LongR. G., & HillE. W. (1997). Establishing and maintaining orientation in mobility. In BlaschB. B., WienerW. R., & WelshR. L. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (pp. 39–59). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
WelshR. L. (1997). The psychosocial dimensions of orientation and mobility. In BlaschB. B., WienerW. R., & WelshR. L. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (pp. 200–227). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
