Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The statistical analysis of data from a single-subject design remains somewhat an issue of debate. The frequently employed procedure for examining data from a single-subject design involves visually inspecting the graphed outcome variable over the observation time. Potential difficulties of this procedure have been shown. The application of traditional statistical tests has also been questioned. The nonparametric smoother has been presented as a possibly appropriate and useful technique for the examination of data from a single-subject research paradigm. This article attempts to validate the use of a nonparametric smoother for the examination of data from a single-subject design. A recommendation is given regarding the use of this technique.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borg, W. R. , & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman.

Campbell, S. K. (1974). Flaws and fallacies in statistical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

DeProspero, A. , & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 12, 573-579.

Gay, L. R. (1987). Educational research: Competenciesfor analysis and application. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill.

Huitema, B. E. (1985). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 107-118.

Janosky, J. E. (1991, April). An overview of the analysis of a single-subject design with recommendatons. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Chicago.

Janosky, J. E. (1992). Use of the nonparametric smoother for examination of data from a single-subject design. Behavior Modification, 16, 387-399.

Matyas, T. A. , & Greenwood, K. M. (1980). Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 21, 341-351.

Ottenbacher, K. J. (1986). Reliability and accuracy of visually analyzing graphed data from single-subject designs. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 464-469.

10.

Ottenbacher, K. J. (1990a). Visual analysis of single-subject data: An empirical analysis. Mental Retardation, 28, 285-290.

11.

Ottenbacher, K. J. (1990b). When is apicture worth a thousandp values? Acomparison of visual and quantitative methods to analyze single subject data. Journal of Special Education, 23, 436-449.

12.

Park, H. , Marascuilo, L. , & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1990). Visual inspection and statistical analysis in single-case designs. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 311-320.

13.

Rashotte, M. , & Henderson, D. (1988). Copingwithrisingfoodcostsinclosedeconomy: Feeding behavior and nocturnal hypothermia in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50,441-456.

14.

Ryan, B. F. , Joiner, B. L. , & Ryan, T. A., Jr. (1985). Minitab. Boston: PWS-Kent.

15.

Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

16.

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

17.

Velleman, P. F. (1980). Definition and comparison of robust nonlinear data smoothing algorithms. Journal of the American Staistiscal Association, 75, 609-615.

18.

Velleman, P. F. , & Hoaglin, D. C. (1981). Applications, basics, and computing of exploratory data analysis. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.

19.

Weiner, I. S. , & Eisen, R. G. (1985, May). Clinical research: The case study and single-subject designs. Journal of Allied Health, pp. 191-201.

20.

Wong, S. , & Woolsey, J. (1989). Reestablishing conversational skills in overdy psychotic, chronic schizophrenic patients. Behavior Modification, 13, 415-430.

Validation of the Use of a Nonparametric Smoother for the Examination of Data from a Single-Subject Design

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References