A treatment package, consisting of multiple exemplar training and community-based instruction, was evaluated for its effectiveness in teaching four students with profound mental retardation and multiple disabilities to participate in two sets of community-living tasks. All training took place in community settings, and each student demonstrated improved performance on at least one task set. In addition, all students demonstrated improved performance on a series of tasks selected to assess generalization of performance across settings, materials, and/or motoric responses required to complete the target task. Maintenance of performance over a 4-to 5-month period was assessed and achieved for two of the students. The results of this investigation are discussed in terms of the implications for programming for students with profound mental retardation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumgart, D. , Brown, L., Pumpian, I., Nisbet, J., Ford, A., Sweet, M., Messina, R., & Schroeder, J. (1982). Principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 7(2), 17-27.
2.
Berg, W. , & Wacker, D. (1989). Evaluation of tactile prompts with a student who is deaf, blind, and mentally retarded. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 22(1), 93-99.
3.
Brown, L. , Nisbet, J., Ford, A., Sweet, M., Shiraga, B., York, J., & Loomis, R. (1983). The critical need for nonschool instruction in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 8(3), 71-77.
4.
Green, C. , Reid, D., White, L., Halford, R., Brittain, D., & Gardner, S. (1988). Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: Staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 21, 31-43.
5.
Homer, R. , Bellamy, G. T., & Colvin, G. T. (1984). Responding in the presence of nontrained stimuli: Implications of generalization error patterns. Journal of the Associationfor Persons With Severe Handicaps, 9, 287-296.
6.
Homer, R. , & McDonald, R. S. (1982). A comparison of single instance and general case instruction in teaching a generalized vocational skill. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 7, 7-20.
7.
Kazdin, A. (1980). Behavior modification in applied settings. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
8.
Liberty, K. , Haring, N., & Martin, M. (1981). Teaching new skills to the severely handicapped. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 6(1), 5-13.
9.
Mager, R. , & Pipe, P. (1970). Analyzing performance problems or "you really oughta wanna."Belmont, CA: Fearon Pittman.
10.
Parsons, M. , & Reid, D. (1990). Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: Providing opportunities to make choices. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23(2), 183-195.
11.
Repp, A. , Barton, L., & Brulle, A. (1983). Acomparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16(4), 435-445.
12.
Rincover, A. , & Koegel, R. (1975). Setting generality and stimulus control in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(3), 235-246.
13.
Rusch, F. , Rose, T., & Greenwood, C. (1988). Introduction to applied behavioranalysis in special education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Sailor, W. , Goetz, L., Anderson, J., Hunt, P., & Gee, K. (1988). Research on community intensive instruction as a model for building functional, generalized skills. In R. Homer, G. Dunlap, & R. Koegel (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings (pp. 67-98). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
15.
Snell, M. , Lewis, A. P., & Houghton, A. (1989). Acquisition and maintenance of toothbrushing skills by students with cerebral palsy and mental retardation. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14(3), 216-226.
16.
Snell, M. , & Zirpoli, T. (1987). Intervention strategies. In M. Snell (Ed.), Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicaps (pp. 110-149). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
17.
Steege, M. , Wacker, D., Berg, W., Cigrand, K., & Cooper, L. (1989). The use of behavioral assessment to prescribe and evaluate treatments for severely handicapped children. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 22(1), 23-33.
18.
Stokes, T. , & Baer, D. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(2), 349-367.
19.
Thompson, B. , & Guess, D. (1989). Students who experience the most profound disabilities: Teacher perspectives. In F. Brown & D. Lehr (Eds.), Persons with profound disabilities: Issues and practices (pp. 3-41). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
20.
Wacker, D. , Berg, W., Berrie, P., & Swatta, P. (1985). Generalization and maintenance of complex skills by severely handicapped adolescents following picture prompt training. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 18, 329-336.
21.
Wacker, D. , Wiggins, B., Fowler, M., & Berg, W. (1988). Training students with profound or multiple handicaps to make requests via microswitches. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 331-343.
22.
Watson, P. J. , & Workman, E. A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal ofBehavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 12, 257-259.
23.
Wilson, P. , Reid, D., Phillips, J., & Burgio, L. (1984). Normalization of institutional mealtimes for profoundly retarded persons: Effects and noneffects of teaching family style dining. Journal ofApplied BehaviorAnalysis, 17(2), 189-201.
