Four students with severe, multiple disabilities learned to use four to five new skills at critical moments within age-appropriate activities. Instruction was provided only at moments critical to the continuation of the activities when natural cues and consequences delineated the need for the target behaviors. This method of intervention was combined with a more traditional package of antecedent prompt-fade procedures and, in a few instances, time delay. The purpose of the study was to analyze the effects of instruction given only at natunal critical moments on the acquisition of basic sensory, motor, social, and communication behaviors. A multiple baseline design across skills within separate activities for four participants was employed. Fifteen of 17 skills were acquired to criterion. In addition, "learning to learn" effects occurred within each activity as instruction of new target behaviors was introduced. The outcomes are important for the participant population because they document the effect of integrated educational models for teaching the most basic skills. Discussion of the motivation provided by activity routines in general education and community settings, as well as interpretation of data when participants have the most severe disabilities, is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumgart, D. , Brown, L., Pumpian, I., Nisbet, J., Ford, A., Sweet, M., Messina, R., & Schroeder, J. (1982). Principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(2), 17-27.
2.
Brown, F., Helmstetter, E., & Guess, D. (1986). Current best practices with students with profound disabilities: Are there any? Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.
3.
Brown, L. , Nisbet, J., Ford, A., Sweet, M., Shiraga, B., York, R., & Loomis, R. (1983). The critical need for nonschool instruction in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 8, 71-77.
4.
Correa, V. , Poulson, C., & Salzberg, C. (1984). Training and generalization of reach-group behavior in blind retarded young children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 56-69.
5.
Falvey, M. (1989). Community-based curriculum: Instructional strategies for students with severe handicaps. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
Forest & Lufthaus . *** AUTHOR: INITIALS?? *** (1989). Promoting educational equality for all students: Circles & maps. In S. Stainback, W. Stainback, & M. Forest (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
7.
Gee, K., Graham, N., Lee, M., & Goetz, L. (1990). Acquisition of basic sensory and motor skills within natural, integrated contexts with students experiencing the most severe challenges. Unpublished manuscript, San Francisco State University.
8.
Gee, K., Graham, N., Lee, M., & Goetz, L. (1991). Inclusive program design: Options for all students in the mainstream of school and community. San Francisco: San Francisco State University, IES Project manual (OSERS/SEP Model Demonstration Grant G008730421).
9.
Gee, K. , Graham, N., Oshima, G., Yoshioka, K., & Goetz, L. (in press). Using time delay within interrupted chain contexts to establish requesting skills with students who have severe and profound multiple disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps.
10.
Gee, K. , Harrell, R., & Rosenberg, R. (1987). Teaching orientation and mobility skills within and across natural opportunities for travel: A model designed for learners with multiple severe disabilities. In L. Goetz, D. Guess, & K. Stremel-Campbell (Eds.), Innovative program design for individuals with sensory impairments (pp. 127-157). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
11.
Goetz, L. , Gee, K., Baldwin, M., & Sailor, W. (1982). Classroom-based sensory assessment procedures for severely handicapped students: Case studies of a stimulus transfer paradigm. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2171-185.
12.
Goetz, L. , & Gee, K. (1987a). Teaching visual attention in functional contexts: Acquisition and generalization of complex visual motor skills. Journal of Vision Impairment and Blindness, 81, 115-118.
13.
Goetz, L. , & Gee, K. (1987b). Functional vision programming: A model for teaching visual behaviors in natural contexts. In L. Goetz, D. Guess, & C. Stremel-Campbell (Eds.), Innovative program design for individuals with sensory impairments. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
14.
Goetz, L. , Gee, K., & Sailor, W. (1985). Using a behavior chain interruption strategy to teach communication skills to students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 10, 21-30.
15.
Gold, M. (1976). Task analysis of a complex assembly task by the retarded blind. Exceptional Children, 43, 78-85.
16.
Gold, M. , & Rittenhouse, R. (1978). Task analysis for teaching eight practical signs to deaf blind individuals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 10, 34-37.
17.
Halvorsen, A. , & Sailor, W. (1990). Integration of students with severe and profound disabilities. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (Vol. 1). New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
Hanson, M. , & Hanline, M. F. (1985). An analysis of response-contingent learning experiences for young children with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 10(1), 31-40.
19.
Holowach, L. (1985). Individualized critical skills model significant other interview (rev. ed.). Sacramento: Califormia State Depariennt of Education, Special Education Resource Network.
20.
Horner, R. , Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. (1988). Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
Koegel, R. , & Koegel, L. (1988). Generalized responsivity and pivotal behaviors. In R. Homer, G. Dunlap, and R. Koegel (Eds.), Generalization and Maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings (pp. 41-53). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
22.
Macht, J. (1970). Examination and re-evaluation of prosthetic lenses employing an operant procedure for measuring subjective visual activity in a retarded child. Journal of Child Psychology, 10, 139-145.
23.
Sailor, W. , Anderson, J., Halvorsen, A., Doering, K., Filler, J., & Goetz, L. (1989). The comprehensive local school: Regular education for all students with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
Sailor, W. , & Goetz, L. (1988). New directions: Communication developnent in persons with severe disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 8, 41-54.
25.
Sailor, W. , Gee, K., Goetz, L., & Graham, N. (1988). Progress in educating students with the most severe disabilities: Is there any?Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 13, 87-99.
26.
Sailor, W. , Goetz, L., Anderson, J., Hunt, P., & Gee, K. (1988). Research on community intensive instruction as a model for building functional generalized skills. In R. Homer, G. Dunlap, & R. Koegel (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance in applied settings (pp. 67-98). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
27.
Snell, M. (1987). Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicaps. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
28.
Snell, M. , & Browder, D. (1986). Community referenced instruction: Research and issues. Joumal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 11, 1-11.
29.
Snell, M. , & Gast, D. (1981). Applying time delay procedures to the instruction of the severely handicapped. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 6, 3-14.
30.
Stainback, S. , Stainback, W., & Forest, M. (Eds.) (1989). Educating all students in the main stream of regular education. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
31.
Stainback, W. , & Stainback, S. (1987, March). Facilitating friendships. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded (EMTR), pp. 18-25.
32.
Strully, J. , & Strully, C. (1989). Friendships as an educational goal. In W. Stainback, S. Stainback, & M. Forest (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
33.
Tawney, J. & Gast, D. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
34.
Touchette, P. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347-354.
35.
Utley, B. , Duncan, D., Strain, P., & Scanlon, K. (1983). Effects of contingent and noncontingent vision stimulation on visual fixation in multiply handicapped children. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8(3), 29-42.
36.
White, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-323.
37.
Wilcox, B. (1986). Review of integration of students with severe handicaps into regular schools. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 11, 74-76.
38.
York, J. , & Vandercook, T. (1989). Designing an integrated education for learners with severe disabilities through the IEP process. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
