A number of descriptive and inferential statistical procedures have been presented previously for examining data from a single-subject design. The statistical analysis of data from a single-subject design, however, remains somewhat controversial. As a complement to the visual inspection of the observed data, the nonparametric smoother is presented as a possibly appropriate and useful technique for the examination of data from a single-subject research paradigm. T'wo working examples are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blumberg, C. J. (1984). Comments on "A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions."Journal ofApplied BehaviorAnalysis, 17, 539-542.
2.
Bock, R. D. (1975). Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Borg, W. R. , & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research:An introduction. New York: Longman.
4.
Campbell, P. H. (1988). Using a single-subject research design to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 732-738.
5.
Campbell, S. K. (1974). Flaws and fallacies in statistical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
Chatfield, C. (1982). The analysis of time series:An introduction. New York: Chapman & Hall.
7.
Connell, P. J. , & Thompson, C. K. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs: Part III. Using flexibility to design or modify experiments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 194-203.
8.
Conover, W. J. (1971). Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: Wiley.
9.
Cook, T. D. , & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
Dattilo, J. , & Nelson, G. D. (1986). Single-subject evaluation in health education. Health Education Quarterly, 13, 249-259.
11.
Edgington, E. S. (1980). Validity of randomization tests for one-subject experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5, 235-251.
12.
Gay, L. R. (1987). Educational research: Competencies foranalysisand application. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
13.
Glass, G. , Willson, V., & Gottman, J. (1975). Designs and analysis of time-series experiments. Boulder, CO: Associated University Press.
14.
Gottman, J. M. , McFall, R. M., & Barnett, J. T. (1969). Design and analysis of research using time series. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 299-306.
15.
Hartmann, D. P. , Gottman, J. M., Jones, R. R., Gardner, W., Kazdin, A. E., & Vaught, R. (1980). Interrupted time-series analysis and its application to behavioral data. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 13, 543-559.
16.
Hersen, M. , & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavioral change. New York: Pergamon.
17.
Holtzman, W. H. (1967). Statistical models for the study of change in the single case. In C. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
18.
Jones, R. R. , Vaught, R. S., & Weinrott, M. (1977). Time-series analysis in operant research. Journal ofApplied BehaviorAnalysis, 10, 151-166.
19.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford.
20.
Kazdin, A. E. (1984). Statistical analyses for single-case experimental designs. In D. H. Barlow & M. Hersen (Eds.), Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed., pp. 285-324). New York: Pergamon.
21.
Kearns, K. P. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs: Part II. Design selection and arrangement of experimental phases. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 204-214.
22.
Kratochwill, T. , Alden, K., Demuth, D., Dawson, D., Panicucci, C., Amston, P., McMurry, N., Hempstead, J., & Levin, J. (1974). A further consideration in the application of an analysis-of-variance model for the intrasubject design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 629-634.
23.
McLaughlin, T. F. (1983). An examination and evaluation of single subject designs used in behavior analysis research in school settings. Educational Research Quarterly, 7, 35-42.
24.
McReynolds, L. V. , & Thompson, C. K. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs: Part 1. Review of the basics of single-subject designs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 194-203.
25.
Mood, A. F. (1950). Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Moore-Ede, M. C. , Sulzman, F. M., & Fuller, C. A. (1982). The clocks that time us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Parsonson, B. S. , & Baer, D. M. (1978). The analysis and presentation of graphic data. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press.
28.
Ryan, B. F. , Joiner, B. L., & Ryan, T. A., Jr. (1985). Minitab. Boston: PWS-KENT.
29.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.
30.
Statistical packages for the social sciences. (1990). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
31.
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
32.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33.
Tryon, W. W. (1982). A simplified time-series for evaluating treatment interventions. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 15,423-429.
34.
Tryon, W. W. (1983). Digital filters in behavioral research. Journal of theExperimentalAnalysis of Behavior, 39, 185-190.
35.
Tryon, W. W. (1984). A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions: A rejoinder to Blumberg. Journal ofApplied BehaviorAnalysis, 17, 543-544.
36.
Velleman, R. F. (1980). Definition and comparison of robust nonlinear data smoothing algorithms. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 609-615.
37.
Velleman, R. F. , & Hoaglin, D. C. (1981). Applications, basics, and computing of exploratory data analysis. Boston: Duxbury Press.
38.
Weiner, I. S. , & Eisen, R. G. (1985, May). Clinical research: The case study and single-subject designs. Journal of Allied Health, pp. 191-201.
39.
White, O. R. (1971). Aglossary of behavioral terminology. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
40.
White, O. R. (1972). A manual for the calculation and use of the median slope: A technique of progress estimation and prediction in the single case. Eugene: University of Oregon, Regional Resource Center for Handicapped Children.
41.
White, O. R. (1974). The "split-middle": A "quickie" method of trend estimation. Seattle: University of Washington, Experimental Education Unit, Child Development and Mental Retardation Center.
