Abstract
Three group treatments for heterosocial problems (systematic desensitization, social skills training, structured homework with cognitive restructuring) were compared to an assessment-control condition. Extensive self-recording of naturally-occurring social interactions and roleplayed interactions in the laboratory provided data for the evaluation of treatment impact. Roleplay assessment of social behavior produced effects for repeated measurement but did not discriminate between treatment conditions. Analyses of covariance of daily self-monitoring data revealed treatment differences, but the covariate (baseline level of performance) was the largest source of variation. The importance of person variables or person-by-situation interactions is highlighted; suggestions for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
