Our main purpose in this review was to determine the extent to which ecological validity was demonstrated and assessed in single-case experimental design (SCED) studies examining the effectiveness of function-based interventions (FBIs) for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) within schools. We reviewed 55 SCED studies published between 1985 and 2019 to identify indicators of ecological validity and the instruments used to assess it. We also conducted an analysis to determine the extent to which implementation procedures were described. Results indicated that approximately half of the assessments and FBIs were conducted by teachers in classrooms. Approximately 50% of the assessments and FBIs were implemented within the context of isolated sessions and required multiple implementers. Ecological validity was assessed in seven of the studies reviewed. A complete description of implementation procedures was provided for approximately half of the assessments and FBIs. Limitations of the present review and future directions for research are discussed.
AldosariM. S. (2016). Efficacy of a systematic process for developing function-based treatment for young children with disabilities. Education & Training in Autism & Developmental Disabilities, 51, 391–403. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26173866
2.
BlairK. S. C.UmbreitJ.DunlapG.JungG. (2007). Promoting inclusion and peer participation through assessment-based intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214070270030401
3.
BowenD. J.KreuterM.SpringB.Cofta-WoerpelL.LinnanL.WeinerD.BakkenS.Patrick KaplanP.SquiersL.FabrizioC.FernandezM. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
4.
CampbellA.TincaniM. (2011). The Power Card strategy: Strength-based intervention to increase direction following of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711400608
5.
CarrE. G.BinkoffJ. A.KologinskyE.EddyM. (1978). Acquisition of sign language by autistic children. I: Expressive labeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-489
6.
CarrE. G.DurandV. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111
7.
CarrE. G.HornerR. H.TurnbullA. P.MarquisJ. G.McLaughlinD. M.McAteeM. L.SmithC. E.RyanK. A.RuefM. B.DoolabhA.Ed BraddockD. (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis. American Association on Mental Retardation.
8.
ChezanL. C.DrasgowE.MartinC. A. (2014). Discrete trial functional analysis and functional communication training with three adults with intellectual disabilities and problem behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9192-2
9.
ClarkS.DunlapG. (2008). A descriptive analysis of intervention research studies published in the journal of positive behavior interventions: 1999 through 2005. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300707311810
10.
ConroyM. A.DunlapG.ClarkeS.AlterP. J. (2005). A descriptive analysis of positive behavioral intervention research with young children with challenging behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25(3), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214050250030301
11.
CookB. G.CookL.LandrumT. J. (2013). Moving research into practice: Can we make dissemination stick?Exceptional Children, 79, 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900203
12.
CookC. R.MayerG. R.Browning WrightD.KraemerB.WallaceM. D.CollinsT.RestoriA. (2012). Exploring the link among behavior intervention plans, treatment integrity, and student outcomes under natural educational conditions. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910369941
13.
DunlapG.FoxL. (2011). Function-based interventions for children with challenging behavior. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111429971
14.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, P. L. 114-95. (December10, 2015). 20 U. S. C. ξ 6301 et seq.
15.
FoxL.VaughnB. J.WyatteM. L.DunlapG. (2002). “We can’t expect other people to understand”: Family perspectives on problem behavior. Exceptional Children, 68, 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290206800402
16.
FlynnS. D.LoY. (2016). Teacher implementation of trial-based functional analysis and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior for students with challenging behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9
17.
GastD. L. (2014). General factors in measurement and evaluation. In GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 85–104). Routledge.
18.
Gaylord-RossR. J. (1979). Mental retardation research, ecological validity, and the delivery of longitudinal educational programs. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246697901300112
19.
HanleyG. P.IwataB. A.McCordB. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(2), 147–186. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147
20.
HardingJ.WackerD. P.BergW. K.BarrettoA.RingdahlJ. (2005). Evaluation of relations between specific antecedent stimuli and self-injury during functional analysis conditions. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 110(3), 205–215.
21.
HessK. L.MorrierM. J.HefflinL. J.IveyM. L. (2008). Autism treatment survey: Services received by children with autism spectrum disorders in public school classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 38, 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0470-5
22.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
23.
HsiaoY.PetersonS. S. (2018). Evidence-based practices provided in teacher education and in-services training programs for special education teachers of students with autism spectrum disorders. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406418758464
24.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P. L. 108-446. (December3, 2004). 20 U. S. C. ξ1400 et seq.
25.
IwataB. A.DorserM. F.SliferK. J.BaumanK. E.RichmanG. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-4684(82)90003-9
26.
IwataB. A.PaceG. M.DorseyM. F.SliferK. J.BaumanK. E.RichmanG. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197
27.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
28.
LaneK. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. (2004). School-based interventions: The tools you need to succeed. Allyn and Bacon.
29.
LangR.SigafoosJ.LancioniG.DiddenR.RispoliM. (2010). Influence of assessment setting on the results of functional analyses of problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(3), 565–567. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-565
30.
LarkinW.HawkinsR. O.CollinsT. (2016). Using trial-based functional analysis to design effective interventions for students diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 31, 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000158
31.
LedfordJ. R.HallE.ConderE.LaneJ. D. (2016). Research for young children with autism spectrum disorders: Evidence of social and ecological validity. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415585956
32.
LekoM. M. (2014). The value of qualitative methods in social validity research. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514524002
33.
MachalicekW.O’ReillyM. F.BeretvasN.SigafoosJ.LancioniG. E. (2007). A review of interventions to reduce challenging behavior in school settings for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2006.10.005
34.
MartinezJ. R.WerchB. L.ConroyM. A. (2016). School-based interventions targeting challenging behaviors exhibited by young children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic literature review. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 265–280. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24827523
McKennaJ. W.FlowerA.CiulloS. (2014). Measuring fidelity to improve intervention effectiveness. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214532348
37.
OdomS. L.Collet-KlingenbergR.RogersS. J.HattonD. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure, 54(4), 275–282. https://doi.org.10.1080/10459881003785506
38.
PaynterJ. M.FergusonS.FordyceK.JoostenA.PakuS.StephensM.TrembathD.KeenD. (2017). Utilization of evidence-based practices by ASD early intervention providers. Autism, 21, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316633032
39.
PenningtonR.StrangeC.StenhoffD.DelanoM.FergusonL. (2012). Leave the running shoes at home: Addressing elopement in the classroom. Beyond Behavior, 21, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/107429561202100302
40.
ReevesL. M.UmbreitJ.FerroJ. B.LiaupsinC. J. (2013). Function-based intervention to support the inclusion of students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 379–391. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880994
41.
ReidD. H.ParsonsM. B. (2002). Working with staff to overcome challenging behavior among people who have severe disabilities: A guide for getting support plans carried out. Habilitative Management Consultants.
42.
ReimersT.WackerD. P.CooperL.DeRaadA. O. (1992). Clinical evaluation of the variables associated with treatment acceptability and their relation to compliance. Behavioral Disorders, 18(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299201800108
43.
RispoliM. J.DavisH. S.GoodwynF. D.CamargoS. (2013). The use of trial-based functional analysis in public school classrooms for two students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 15(3), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300712457420
44.
RojahnJ.SchroederS. R.HochT. A. (2007). Self-injurious behavior in intellectual disabilities. Elsevier.
45.
SassoG. M.ReimersT. M.CooperL. J.WackerD. P.BergW.SteegeM.KellyL.AllaireA. (1992). Use of descriptive and experimental analyses to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(4), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-809
46.
SchalockR. L.VerdugoM. A.GomezL. E. (2011). Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.004
47.
ScottT. M.KampsD. M. (2007). The future of functional behavioral assessment in school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 32(3), 146–157. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23890597
48.
SeveriniK. E.LedfordJ. R.RobertsonR. E. (2018). Systematic review of problem behavior interventions: Outcomes, demographics, and settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48, 3261–3272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3591-0
49.
SingerG. H. S. (2000). Ecological validity. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 2(2), 122–124.
50.
SnodgrassM. R.ChungM. Y.MeadanH.HalleJ. W. (2018). Social validity in single-case research: A systematic literature review of prevalence and application. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 74, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.01.007
51.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism. National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team. https://ncaep.fpg.unc.edu/research-resources
52.
StichterJ.ClarkeS.DunlapG. (2004). An analysis of trends regarding proactive and ecologically valid interventions in applied research. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 86–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899789
53.
Webster-StrattonC.HammondM. (1997). Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: A comparison of child and parent training interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(1), 93–109. https://doi.org.10.1037/0022-006X.65.1.93
54.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
55.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK. A.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.BrockM. E.PlavnickJ. B.FleuryV. P.SchultzT. R. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute. https://fpg.unc.edu/node/6614
56.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK. A.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.BrockM. E.PlavnickJ. B.FleuryV. P.SchultzT. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
