The majority of students receiving special education services for emotional disturbance (ED) receive a significant amount of instruction in general education classrooms, which emphasizes curriculums based on college and career readiness standards. In turn, those teachers who provide instruction to students with ED in inclusive settings are responsible for using evidence-based practices (EBPs) for those teaching situations in which they exist to meet free appropriate public education (FAPE) mandates. However, the identification of EBPs is a necessary pre-condition to eventual school adoption and teacher use of such practices. In this investigation, we completed a synthesis of syntheses to (a) determine the degree to which academic intervention research has focused on students with ED in general education classrooms and (b) identify practices that are effective at improving the academic performance of students with ED in these settings. Overall, few studies were identified. Of those studies identified, half did not disaggregate outcomes for students with ED. A quality indicator coding based on the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) design standards revealed that no studies with disaggregated outcomes permitted causal inferences. Implications for school practice and areas for future research are discussed.
**BellK.YoungK.BlairM.NelsonR. (1990). Facilitating mainstreaming of students with behavioral disorders using classwide peer tutoring. School Psychology Review, 19, 564-573.
2.
*BennerG.NelsonJ.RalstonN.MooneyP. (2010). A meta-analysis of reading instruction on the reading skills of students with or at risk of behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 86-102.
3.
BlankenshipT.BoonT.ForeC. (2007). Inclusion and placement decisions for students with special needs: A historical analysis of relevant statutory and case law. Electronic Journal of Inclusive Education, 2, 1-11.
4.
BrighamF.AhnS.StrideA.McKennaJ. (2016). FAPE-Accompli: Misapplication of the principles of inclusion and students with EBD. In BakkenJ.ObiakorF. (Eds.), Advances in Special Education—General and special education inclusion in an age of change: Roles of professionals involved (Vol. 31, pp. 31-47). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
5.
BristolL. (2015). Leading-for-inclusion: Transforming action through teacher talk. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19, 802-820.
6.
*BurkeM.BoonR.HattonH.Bowman-PerrottL. (2015). Reading interventions for middle and secondary students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A quantitative review of single-case studies. Behavior Modification, 39, 43-68.
7.
BurnsM.YsseldykeJ. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 43, 3-11.
8.
CiulloS.OrtizM.Al OtaibaS.LaneK. (2016). Advanced reading comprehension expectations in secondary school: Considerations for students with emotional or behavior disorders. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27, 54-64.
9.
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. ______. (2017).
10.
*EnnisR.JolivetteK. (2014). Existing research and future directions for self-regulated strategy development with students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 32-45.
11.
ESSA (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015-2016).
12.
FallonL.Collier-MeekM.MagginD.SanettiL.JohnsonA. (2015). Is performance feedback for educators an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation based on single-case research. Exceptional Children, 81, 227-246.
13.
FarmerT. (2013). When universal approaches and prevention services are not enough: The importance of understanding the stigmatization of special education for students with EBD—A response to Kauffman and Bader. Behavioral Disorders, 39, 32-42.
14.
FixsenD.NaoomS.BlaséK.FriedmanR.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication No. 231). Tampa: The National Implementation Research Network, Mental Health Institute, Louis de la Parte Florida, University of South Florida.
15.
FlowerA.McKennaJ.HaringC. (2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs really preparing our teachers?Preventing School Failure, 61, 163-169.
16.
ForesmanS. (2000). Scott Foresman reading. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
17.
FuchsD.FuchsL.VaughnS. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important?Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 13-18.
18.
GageN.LewisT.AdamsonR. (2010). An examination of 35 years of “Behavioral Disorders”: What, how, and how has been published. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 280-293.
19.
*GarwoodJ. (2017). Literacy interventions for secondary students formally identified with emotional and behavioral disorders: Trends and gaps in the research. Journal of Behavioral Education. Advance online publication.
20.
GarwoodJ.BrunstingN.FoxL. (2014). Improving reading comprehension and fluency outcomes for adolescents with emotional-behavioral disorders: Recent research synthesized. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 181-194.
21.
*GriffithA.TroutA.HagamanJ.HarperJ. (2008). Interventions to improve the literacy functioning of adolescents with emotional and/or behavior disorders: A review of the literature between 1965 and 2005. Behavioral Disorders, 33, 124-140.
22.
GroscheM.VolpeR. (2013). Response-to-intervention (RTI) as a model to facilitate inclusion for students with learning and behaviour problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28, 254-269.
23.
GuckertM.MastropieriM.ScruggsT. (2016). Personalizing research: Special educators’ awareness of evidence-based practice. Exceptionality, 24, 63-78.
24.
GunterP.Kenton-DennyR.VennM. (2000). Modification of instructional materials and procedures for curricular success of students with emotional and behavioural disorders. Preventing School Failure, 44, 116-121.
25.
HissR. (2004). Translational research—Two phases of a continuum. In From clinical trials to community: The science of translating diabetes and obesity research (pp. 11-14). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
26.
*HodgeJ.RiccominiP.BufordR.HerbstM. (2006). A review of instructional interventions in mathematics for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 297-311.
27.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act. 20 U.S.C. §1400. (2004).
28.
KauffmanJ. (2010). Commentary: Current status of the field and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 180-184.
29.
KauffmanJ. (2015). Opinion on recent developments and the future of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 9-13.
30.
KauffmanJ.BaderJ. (2017). It’s instruction over place—Not the other way around. Phi Delta Kappan, 98, 55-59.
31.
KauffmanJ.BantzJ.McCulloughJ. (2002). Separate and better: A special public school class for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 10, 149-170.
32.
KliewerC.BiklenD. (2001). “School’s not really a place for reading”: A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 26, 1-12.
33.
KozikP.CooneyB.VinciguerraS.GradelK.BlackJ. (2009). Promoting inclusion in secondary schools through appreciative inquiry. American Secondary Education, 38, 77-91.
34.
LevyS.ChardD. (2001). Research on reading instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 48, 429-445.
35.
LloydJ.FornessS.KavaleK. (1998). Some methods are more effective than others. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 195-200.
36.
*LosinskiM.Cuenca-CarlinoY.ZablockiM.TeagardenJ. (2014). Examining the efficacy of self-regulated strategy development for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 40, 52-67.
37.
MacMillanD.GreshamF.FornessS. (1996). Full inclusion: An empirical perspective. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 145-159.
38.
MagginD.ChafouleasS.GoddardK.JohnsonA. (2011). A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 529-554.
39.
MagginD.WehbyJ.FarmerT.BrooksD. (2016). Intensive interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Issues, theory, and future directions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24, 127-137.
40.
**MaheadyL.SaccaM.HarperG. (1987). Classwide peer tutoring teams: The effects of peer-mediated instruction on the academic performance of secondary mainstreamed students. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 107-121.
41.
**MaheadyL.SaccaM.HarperG. (1988). Classwide peer tutoring with mildly handicapped high school students. Exceptional Children, 55, 52-59.
MastropieriM.ScruggsT. (2007). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
44.
**MastropieriM.ScruggsT.MantizicopoulosP.SturgeonA.GoodwinL.ChungS. (1998). “A place where living things affect and depend on each other”: Qualitative and quantitative outcomes associated with inclusive science education. Science Education, 82, 163-179.
45.
**MastropieriM.ScruggsT.NorlandJ.BerkeleyS.McDuffieK.TornquistE.ConnorsN. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40, 130-137.
46.
*McKennaJ.KimM.ShinM.PfannensteilK. (2017). An evaluation of single-case reading intervention study quality for students with and at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavior Modification, 41, 868-906.
47.
MitchellB.AdamsonR.McKennaJ. (2017). Curbing our enthusiasm: An analysis of the Check-in/Check-out literature using the Council for Exceptional Children’s Evidence-Based Practice Standards. Behavior Modification, 41, 343-367.
48.
*MulcahyC.KrezmienM.TraversJ. (2016). Improving mathematics performance among secondary students with EBD: A methodological review. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 113-128.
49.
*MulcahyC.MacciniP.WrightK.MillerJ. (2014). An examination of intervention research with secondary students with EBD in light of Common Cores State Standards for Mathematics. Behavioral Disorders, 39, 146-164.
50.
NiesynM. (2009). Strategies for success: Evidence-based instructional practices for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 53, 227-233.
51.
*PierceC.ReidR.EpsteinM. (2004). Teacher-mediated interventions for children with EBD and their academic outcomes: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 175-188.
52.
**PraterM.HoganS.MillerS. (1992). Using self-monitoring to improve on-task behavior and academic skills of an adolescent with mild handicaps across special and regular education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 43-55.
53.
**RaffertyL. (2012). Self-monitoring during whole group reading instruction: Effects among students with emotional and behavioral disabilities during summer school intervention sessions. Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 17, 157-173.
54.
*RalstonN.BennerG.TsaiS.RiccominiP.NelsonJ. (2014). Mathematics instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A best-evidence synthesis. Preventing School Failure, 58, 1-16.
55.
ReedL.GableR. A.YanekK. (2014). Hard times … uncertain future: Examining issues facing those working in the field of EBD. In GarnerP.KauffmanJ.ElliottJ. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
56.
*RiveraM.Al-OtaibaS.KoorlandM. (2006). Reading instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders and at risk of antisocial behaviors in primary grades: Review of literature. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 323-337.
57.
RobertsG. J.SolisM.CiulloS.McKennaJ. W.VaughnS. (2015). Reading interventions with behavioral and social skill outcomes: A synthesis of findings. Behavior Modification, 39, 8-42. doi:10.1177/0145445514561318
58.
*RyanJ.ReidR.EpsteinM. (2004). Peer-mediated intervention studies on academic achievement for students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 330-341.
59.
SalendS.DuhaneyG. (1999). The impact of inclusion on students with and without disabilities and their educators. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 114-126.
60.
SimpsonR. (2004). Inclusion of students with behavior disorders in general education settings: Research and measurement issues. Behavior Disorders, 30, 19-31.
61.
SkerbetzM.KostewiczD. (2013). Academic choice for included students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 57, 212-222.
62.
SolisM.VaughnS.SwansonE.McCulleyL. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 498-510.
63.
*SpencerV. (2006). Peer tutoring and students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of the literature. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 204-222.
64.
*SreckovicM.CommonE.KnowlesM.LaneK. (2014). A review of self-regulated strategy development for writing for students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 39, 56-77.
65.
StoutjesdijkR.ScholteE.SwaabH. (2012). Special needs characteristics of children with emotional and behavioral disorders that affect inclusion in regular education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 92-104.
66.
SullivanA. L.SadehS. (2016) Does the Empirical Literature Inform Prevention of Dropout among Students with Emotional Disturbance?A Systematic Review and Call to Action, Exceptionality, 24(4), 251-262, DOI: 10.1080/09362835.2016.1196440
67.
*TempletonT.NeelR.BloodE. (2008). Meta-analysis of math interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(4), 226-239.
68.
*TherrienW.TaylorJ.WattS.KaldenbergE. (2014). Science instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 15-27.
69.
Time Warp Plus. (2006). Dallas, TX: Cambium Learning Group.
70.
TorgesenJ.BryantB. (1994). Phonological awareness training for reading. Austin, TX: ProEd.
71.
TurriM.MercerS.McIntoshK.NeseR.Strickland-CohenM.HoseltonR. (2016). Examining barriers to sustained implementation of school-wide prevention practices. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42, 6-17.
U.S. Department of Education. (2015). EDFacts Data Warehouse (EDW): IDEA Part B Child Count and Educational Environments Collection, 2014-2015.Washington, DC: Author.
74.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2016). What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Retrieved from http://whatworks.ed.gov
75.
VaughnS.GerstenR.ChardD. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.
76.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006). The academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings: A two year study Indiana inclusion study. Bloomington: Indiana Institute on Disability & Community.
77.
WehbyJ.LaneK.FalkK. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 194-197.
78.
**WehbyJ.LaneK.FalkK. (2005). An inclusive approach to improving early literacy skills of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 155-169.
79.
YellM. L. (2016). The law and special education (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
80.
YellM.BatemanD. (2017). Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017): FAPE and the U.S. Supreme Court. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50, 7-15.
