Some adjudicated adolescents receive treatment for their offenses in residential facilities. Detained adolescents’ engagement in either low levels of compliant behavior or excess behavior (e.g., swearing, gestures) while following commands from residential personnel may result in decreased opportunities for those youth to access preferred activities. The current study employed nonconcurrent multiple baseline across participants designs to evaluate the effects of a procedure to increase seven detained adolescents’ quiet compliance with academic and vocational demands. Results show that problem behavior decreased to zero or near-zero levels for each participant during simulated conditions and suggest that self-control, alone or in combination with a differential reinforcement of low rate behavior for omitting problem behavior, may have been responsible for the behavior changes. We discuss some clinical implications of the findings.
BoschS.FuquaR. W. (2001). Behavioral cusps: A model for selecting targeting behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 123-125.
2.
BroganK. M.FalligantJ. M.RappJ. T. (2017). Interdependent group contingencies decrease adolescents’ disruptive behaviors during group therapy: A practitioner’s demonstration. Behavior Modification, 41, 405-421.
3.
ChampagneJ. M.IkeE. C.McLaughlinT. F.WilliamsR. L. (1990). Use of differential reinforcement of lower rates of behavior and self-monitoring with a delinquent adolescent in a residential setting. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 17, 123-132.
4.
ConyersC.MiltenbergerR. G.PetersonB.GubinA.JurgensM.SeldersA.. . . BarenzR. (2004). An evaluation of in vivo desensitization and video modeling to increase compliance with dental procedures in persons with mental retardation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 233-238.
5.
CookJ. L.RappJ. T.MannK. R.McHughC.BurjiC.NutaR. (2017). A practitioner model for increasing eye contact in children with autism. Behavior Modification, 41, 382-404.
6.
CookJ. L.RappJ. T.SchulzeK. A. (2015). Differential negative reinforcement of other behavior to increase wearing of a medical bracelet. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 901-906.
7.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
DeLeonI. G.IwataB. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533.
9.
FrenchS. A.GendreauP. (2006). Reducing prison misconducts: What works!Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 185-21
10.
FixsenD. L.BlaséK. A.TimbersG. D.WolfM. M. (2007). In search of program implementation: 792 replications of the teaching-family model. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8, 96-110.
11.
FordJ. D.BlausteinM. E. (2013). Systematic self-regulation: A framework for trauma-informed services in residential juvenile justice program. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 665-677.
12.
HarropC.McBeeM.BoydB. A. (2016). How are child restricted and repetitive behaviors associated with caregiver stress over time? A parallel process multilevel growth model. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5, 1773-1783.
13.
HayesS. C. (1981). Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 193-211.
14.
KelleyD. P.IIIWilderD. A.CarrJ. E.ReyC.GreenN.LipschultzJ. (2015). Research productivity among practitioners in behavior analysis: Recommendations from the prolific. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 201-206.
15.
KissiA.HughesS.MertensG.Barnes-HolmesD.De HouwerJ.CrombezG. (2017). A systematic review of pliance, tracking, and augmenting. Behavior Modification. 41, 683-707.
16.
KodakT.GrowL. L. (2011). Behavioral treatment of autism. In FisherW. W.PiazzaC. C.RoaneH. S. (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 402-416). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
LanovazM. J.RappJ. T. (2016). Using single-case experiments to support evidence-based decisions: How much is enough?Behavior Modification, 40, 377-395.
18.
MorrisseyC. (1997). A multimodal approach to controlling inpatient assaultiveness among incarcerated juveniles. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 25, 31-42.
19.
MudfordO. C.MartinN. T.HuiJ. K.TaylorS. A. (2009). Assessing observer accuracy in continuous recording of rate and duration: Three algorithms compared. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 527-539.
20.
NovotnyM. A.SharpK. J.RappJ. T.JelinskiJ. D.LoodE. A.SteffesA. K.MaM. (2014). False positives with visual analysis for nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs and ABAB designs: Preliminary findings. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 933-943.
21.
RachlinH. (2016). Self-control based on soft commitment. The Behavior Analyst, 39, 259-268.
22.
Rosales-RuizJ.BaerD. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 533-544.
WilderD. A.MajdalanyL.SturkieL.SmeltzL. (2015). Further evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence with and without programmed reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 511-522.
