Investigating the Similarities and Differences Between Practitioners of Second- and Third-Wave Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies

Abstract

There has been much discussion in the literature recently regarding the conceptual and technical differences between so-called second- (e.g., Beckian cognitive therapy) and third-wave (e.g., acceptance and commitment therapy) behavioral therapies. Previous research has not addressed the potential similarities and differences among the practitioners of these types of approaches. The current study examined possible differences in the characteristics of second-wave (n = 55) and third-wave cognitive-behavioral therapists (n = 33) using an Internet-based survey. There were differences found at the technical level between the two groups. As expected, third-wave therapists reported greater use of mindfulness/acceptance techniques. Also, third-wave therapists reported greater use of exposure techniques and second-wave therapists reported greater use of cognitive restructuring and relaxation techniques. In general, third-wave clinicians were more eclectic at the technical level and demonstrated significantly greater use of family systems techniques, existential/humanistic techniques, and the total number of techniques. No significant differences were found on the attitudinal measures administered, including reliance on an intuitive thinking style, acceptance of complementary and alternative therapies and related health beliefs, or most attitudes toward evidence-based practices. The authors did not identify many differences between second-wave and third-wave therapists other than in terms of the techniques they employ. The clinical and research implications for these findings are discussed.

Keywords

cognitive-behavioral therapy mindfulness and acceptance therapies therapist characteristics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarons, G.A. ( 2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6, 61-74.

Arch, J.J. , & Craske, M.G. ( 2008). Acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: Different treatments, similar mechanisms? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 263-279.

Beck, A.T. ( 1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

Browne, K. ( 2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 47-60.

Butler, A.C. , Chapman, J.E. , Forman, E.M. , & Beck, A.T. ( 2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17-31.

Corrigan, P.W. ( 2001). Getting ahead of the data: A threat to some behavior therapies. Behavior Therapist, 24, 189-193.

Ellis, A. ( 1957). Outcome of employing three techniques of psychotherapy . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 13, 344-350.

Forman, E.M. , & Herbert, J.D. ( 2009). New directions in cognitive behavior therapy: Acceptance-based therapies. In W. O’Donohue & J. E. Fisher (Eds.), General principles and empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy (pp. 77-101). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Gaudiano, B.A. ( 2009). Öst’s (2008) methodological comparison of clinical trials of acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavior therapy: Matching Apples with Oranges? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 1066-1070.

10.

Gaudiano, B.A. ( 2010). Evaluating acceptance and commitment therapy: An analysis of a recent critique. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 5, 311-329.

11.

Hayes, S.C. ( 2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639-665.

12.

Hayes, S.C. , Strosahl, K.D. , & Wilson, K.G. ( 1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford.

13.

Herbert, J.D. , & Forman, E.M. (in press). Caution: The differences between CT and ACT may be larger (and smaller) than they appear. Behavior Therapy.

14.

Herbert, J.D. , Forman, E.M. , & England, E.L. ( 2009). Psychological acceptance. In W. O’Donohue & J. E. Fisher (Eds.), General principles and empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy (pp. 102-114). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

15.

Hoffman, S.G. , & Asmundson, G.J.G. (2008). Acceptance and mindfulness-based therapy: New wave or old hat? Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1-16.

16.

Illardi, S.S. , & Craighead, W.E. (1994). The role of nonspecific factors in cognitive-behavior therapy for depression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 138-156.

17.

Lie, D.A. , & Boker, J. ( 2004). Development and validation of the CAM Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ) and CAM use and attitudes amongst medical students. BMC Medical Education, 4, 1-9.

18.

Lindeman, M. , Keskivaara, P. , & Roschier, M. ( 2000). Assessment of magical beliefs about food and health. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 195-209.

19.

Linehan, M.M. ( 1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford .

20.

Longmore, R.J. , & Worrell, M. ( 2007). Do we need to challenge thoughts in cognitive behavior therapy? Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 173-187.

21.

Öst, L.-G. ( 2008). Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 296-321.

22.

Pacini, R. , & Epstein, S. ( 1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.

23.

Segal, Z.V. , Williams, J.M.G. , & Teasdale, J.D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York, NY: Guilford.

24.

Sharp, I.R. , Herbert, J.D. , & Redding, R. ( 2008). The role of critical thinking in practicing psychologists’ theoretical orientation and choice of intervention techniques. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 6, 21-30.

25.

Sharp, W. , Schulenberg, S.E. , Wilson, K.G. , & Murrell, A.R. ( 2004). Logotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT): An initial comparison of values-centered approaches. International Forum for Logotherapy, 27, 98-105.

26.

Skinner, B.F. ( 1953). Some contributions of an experimental analysis of behavior to psychology as a whole. American Psychologist, 8, 69-78.

27.

Watson, J.B. ( 1925). Behaviorism. New York, NY: Nortan.