This study aimed to isolate the conditions under which aversive stimulation is experienced as more or less discomforting/unpleasant. Discomfort was induced by playing loud noises through headphones while participants performed computer tasks. We employed 4 main conditions. Condition 1: the acceptance-based protocol (ACT), intended to integrate discomfort in a valued direction, was implemented before the Inclusion Task (task performance could continue despite the presence of the noise). Subsequently, the experiential avoidance-based protocol (EA), intended to promote a relation of opposition between discomfort and valued actions, was implemented before the Opposition Task (task performance was suspended until the participants eliminated the sounds). Condition 2: this order was reversed. Conditions 3 and 4: the tasks were presented without any protocol. The ACT protocol produced the lowest level of discomfort, particularly when it was implemented before participants had experimental experience in trying to control discomfort. Two postcontrol conditions confirmed this result. Implications for prevention and treatment of psychological suffering are discussed.
Batten, S.V., Follette, V.M., & Aban, I.B. ( 2001). Experiential avoidance and high-risk sexual behavior in survivors of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 10, 101-120.
2.
Biglan, A., Hayes, S.C., & Pistorello, J. (2008). Acceptance and commitment: Implications for prevention science. Prevention science, 9, 139-152.
3.
Dalrymple, K.L., & Herbert, J.D. ( 2007). Acceptance and commitment therapy for generalized social anxiety disorder a pilot study. Behavior Modification, 31, 543-568.
4.
Gil-González, E. (September, 2008). Transformation of functions via hierarchical relational frames. Master project Functional Analysis of Clinical and Health Behavior. University of Almería, Spain.
5.
Griffee, K., & Dougher, M.J. ( 2002). Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 433-447.
6.
Gutiérrez, O., Luciano, C., Rodríguez, M., & Fink, B.C. ( 2004). Comparison between and acceptance-based and a cognitive-control-based protocols for coping with pain. Behavior Therapy, 35, 767-784.
7.
Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. ( 2001). Relational frame theory. A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic.
8.
Hayes, S.C., Bissett, R., Korn, Z., Zettle, R.D., Rosenfarb, I., Cooper, I., et al. (1999). The impact of acceptance versus control rationales on pain tolerance. Psychological Record, 49, 33-47.
9.
Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., & Wilson, K.G. ( 1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford .
10.
Hayes, S.C., Wilson, K.G., Gifford, E.V., Follette, V., & Strosahl, K. ( 1996). Experiential avoidance and behavior disorder: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152-1168.
11.
Healy, H.A., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Keogh, C., Luciano, C., & Wilson, K. ( 2008). An experimental test for a cognitive defusion exercise: Coping with negative and positive self-statements. Psychological Record, 58, 623-640.
12.
Karekla, M., Forsyth, J.P., & Kelly, M.M. ( 2004). Emotional avoidance and panicogenic responding to a biological challenge procedure. Behavior Therapy, 35, 725-746.
13.
Luciano, M.C., & Hayes, S.C. ( 2001). Trastorno de evitación experiencial [Experiential avoidance disorder]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 1, 109-157.
14.
Luciano, M.C., Rodríguez-Valverde, M., & Gutiérrez, O. (2004). A proposal for synthesizing verbal contexts in Experiential Avoidance Disorder and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 377-394.
15.
Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Cabello, F., & Hernández, M. (2009). Developing self-directed rules. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding. Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 335-352). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
16.
Masedo, A.I., & Esteve, R.M. ( 2007). Effects of suppression, acceptance and spontaneous coping on pain tolerance, pain intensity and distress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 199-209.
17.
Masuda, A., Hayes, S.C., Sackett, C.F., & Towhig, M.P. ( 2004). Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: Examining the impact of a ninety year old technique. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 477-485.
18.
Masuda, A., Hayes, S.C., Twohig, M.P., Drossel, C., Lillis, J., & Washio, Y. ( 2009). A parametric study of cognitive defusion and the believability and discomfort of negative self-relevant thoughts. Behavior Modification, 33, 250-262.
19.
McMullen, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., Luciano, C., & Cochrane, A. ( 2008). Acceptance versus distraction: Brief instructions, metaphors and exercises in increasing tolerance for self-delivered electric shocks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 122-129.
20.
Norberg, M.M., Wetterneck, C.T., Woods, D.W., & Conelea, C.A. ( 2007). Experiential avoidance as a mediator of relationships between cognitions and hair-pulling severity. Behavior Modification , 31, 367-381.
21.
Páez-Blarrina, M., Luciano, M.C., GutiérrezMartínez, O., Valdivia, S., Ortega, J., & Rodríguez Valverde, M. (2008a). The role of values with personal examples in altering the functions of pain: Comparisons between acceptance-based and cognitive-control-based protocols. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 84-97.
22.
Páez-Blarrina, M., Luciano, M.C., Gutiérrez Martínez, O., Valdivia, S., Rodríguez Valverde, M. & Ortega, J., (2008b). Coping with pain in the motivational context of values: A comparison between an acceptance-based and a cognitive-control-based protocol. Behavior Modification, 32, 403-422.
23.
Purdon, C. ( 1999). Thought suppression and psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 11, 1029-1054.
24.
Rehfeldt, R.A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities . Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
25.
Spira, A.P., Zvolensky, M.J., Eifert, G.H., & Feldner, M.T. ( 2004). Avoidance-oriented coping as a predictor of anxiety-based physical stress: A test using biological challenge. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 18, 309-323.
26.
Törneke, N., Luciano, M.C., & Valdivia-Salas, S. (2008). Rule-governed behavior and psychological problems. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8, 141-156.
27.
Wenzlaff, R.M., & Wegner, D.M. ( 2000). Thought suppression. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 59-91.
28.
Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior , 82, 177-195.
29.
Wilson, K.G., & Luciano, M.C. ( 2002). Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso: Un tratamiento conductual centrado en los valores [Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A behavioral treatment oriented to personal values]. Madrid: Pirámide.
