Studies of behavior modification interventions for disruptive behavior in schools have generally focused on classroom behavior with less research directed toward child behavior in other school settings (e.g., cafeterias). The present report documents the effect of a group contingency intervention with a random reward component, targeting disruptive cafeteria behavior. An uncontrolled study of the effect of the group contingency program across the school year suggested substantial behavior improvement after the program started. Two natural treatment discontinuations during the same school year provide further support for the intervention. Both sources of information suggest behavioral improvement in rule-following behavior when the program was actively implemented.
Abramowitz, A.J., & O'Leary, S.G. (1992). Behavioral interventions for the classroom: Implications for students with ADHD. School Psychology Review, 20, 220-234.
2.
Atkins, M.S., Graczyk, P.A., Frazier, S.L., & Abdul-Alil, J. (2003). Toward a new model for promoting urban children's mental health: Accessible, effective, and sustainable school-based mental health services. School Psychology Review , 12, 503-514.
3.
Busk, P.L., & Serlin, R.C. (2005). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Craig, W.M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21, 22-36.
5.
Cunningham, C.E., Cunningham, L., Martorelli, V., Tran, A., Young, J., & Zacharias, R. (1998). The effects of primary division, student-mediated conflict resolution programs on playground aggression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39, 653-662.
6.
Dishion, T.J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755-764.
7.
Fabiano, G.A., & Pelham, W.E. (2003). Improving the effectiveness of classroom intervention for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 122-128.
8.
Holland, E.L., & McLaughlin, T.F. (1982). Using public posting and group consequences to manage student behavior during supervision. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 29-34.
9.
LaRowe, L.N., Tucker, R.D., & McGuire, J. M. (1980). Lunchroom noise control using feedback and group contingent reinforcement. Journal of School Psychology , 18, 51-57.
10.
Leff, S.S., Power, T.J., Costigan, T.E., & Manz, P.H. (2003). Assessing the climate of the playground and lunchroom: Implications for bullying prevention programming. School Psychology Review, 32, 418-430.
11.
Lewis, T.J., Powers, L.J., Kelk, M.J., & Newcomer, L.L. (2002). Reducing problem behaviors on the playground: An investigation of the application of school-wide positive behavior supports. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 181-190.
12.
Lewis, T.J., Sugai, G., & Colvin, G. (1998). Reducing problem behavior through a school-wide system of effective behavioral support: Investigation of a school-wide social skills training program and contextual interventions. School Psychology Review, 27, 446-459.
13.
Litow, L., & Pumroy, D.K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341-347.
14.
MacPherson, E.M., Candee, B.L., & Hohman, R.J. (1974). A comparison of three methods for eliminating disruptive lunchroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 287-297.
Pelham, W.E., & Fabiano, G.A. (in press). Evidence-based psychosocial treatment for ADHD: An update . Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.
17.
Pepler, D.J., & Craig, W.M. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31, 548-553.
18.
Popkin, J., & Skinner, C.H. (2003). Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components. School Psychology Review, 32, 282-295.
19.
Roderick, C., Pitchford, M., & Miller, A. (1997). Reducing aggressive playground behaviour by means of a school-wide “raffle.” Educational Psychology in Practice, 13, 57-63.
20.
Salzberg, B.H., Hopkins, B.L., Wheeler, A.J., & Taylor, L. (1974). Reduction of kindergarten children's disruptive behaviors with delayed feedback and delayed contingent access to play. Journal of School Psychology, 12, 24-30.
21.
Samuels, D.D., Swerdlik, M., & Margolis, H. (1980). The development and analysis of an elementary comprehensive lunchroom management program. Education, 101, 123-126.
22.
Schmidt, G.W., & Ulrich, R.E. (1969). Effects of group events upon classroom noise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 171-179.
23.
Sherman, A.R. (1973). Behavior modification: Theory and practice. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
24.
Skinner, C.H., Cashwell, C.S., & Dunn, M.S. (1996). Independent and interdependent group contingencies: Smoothing the rough waters. Special Services in the Schools , 12, 61-78.
25.
Skinner, C.H., Williams, R.L., & Neddenriep, C.E. (2004). Using interdependent group-oriented reinforcement to enhance academic performance in general education classrooms . School Psychology Review, 33, 384-397.
26.
Stage, S.A., & Quiroz, D.R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333-368.
27.
Walker, H.M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices. New York: Brooks/Cole .
28.
Walker, H.M., & Hops, H. (1976). Use of normative peer data as a standard for evaluating classroom treatment effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 9, 159-168.
29.
White, D.M., Rusch, F.R., Kazdin, A.E., & Hartmann, D.P. (1989). Applications of meta analysis in individual-subject research. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 281-296.
