An urgent demand from Connecticut parents for behavioral intervention resulted in the development of the River Street Autism Program (RSAP). This research-to-practice program implements intervention service based on empirical research findings conducted with children diagnosed with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. RSAP is provided through a regional service center and provides services for children entering the program at 2 to 5 years old. Because of the diverse nature of the districts served by RSAP, the delivered services varied according to the needs of the districts, available funding, and family preferences. Program evaluation data were therefore examined with regard to outcomes for children who received programs with differing numbers of treatment components. Treatment components that varied across children were treatment intensity, duration, extent of family participation, staff training, and supervision. Outcome data revealed that families reported greater gains in child functioning and quality of life when children received programs with more treatment components.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Baily, D. B., McWilliam, R. A., Darkes, L. A., Hebbeler, K., Simeonsson, R. J., Spiker, D., et al. (1998). Family outcomes in early intervention: A framework for program evaluation and efficacy research. Exceptional Children, 64, 313-328.
3.
Charlop, M. H., Schreibman, L., & Thibodeau, M. G. (1985). Increasing spontaneous verbal responding in autistic children using a time delay procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 155-166.
4.
Connecticut State Department of Education. (1998). Report of the Connecticut task force on issues for the education of children with autism. Middletown, CT: Special Education Research Center. Hartford: Author.
5.
Connecticut State Department of Education. (2002). Classic special education tables, 2001- 2002. Middletown, CT: Special Education Research Center.
6.
Croen, L. A., Grether, J. K., Hoogstrate, J., & Selvin, S. (2002). The changing prevalence of autism in California. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 207-215.
7.
Dyer, K. (1987). The competition of autistic stereotyped behavior with usual and specially assessed reinforcers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 606-626.
8.
Dyer, K. (1989). The effects of preference on spontaneous verbal requests in individuals with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 184-189.
9.
Dyer, K., Dunlap, G., & Winterling, V. (1990). The effects of choice making on the problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 515-524.
10.
Dyer, K., & Luce, S. C. (1996). Teaching practical communication skills. In D. Browder (Ed.), Innovations (pp. 345-358). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
11.
Dyer, K., Santarcangelo, S., & Luce, S. C. (1987). Developmental influences in teaching language forms to students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 335-347.
12.
Egel, A. L., Shafer, M. S., & Neef, N. A. (1984). Receptive acquisition and generalization of prepositional responding in autistic children: A comparison of two procedures. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 4, 285-298.
13.
Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). The picture exchange communication system training manual. Newark, NJ: Pyramid Educational Products.
14.
Green, G. (1996). Early behavioral intervention for autism: What does research tell us? In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism (pp. 29-44). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
15.
Harris, T., Dyer, K., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1992, May). Training teachers in a preschool classroom to promote reciprocal interactions between typical children and children with autism. Paper presented at the Annual Convention for the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.
16.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411-420.
17.
Johnson, S. C., Meyer, L., & Taylor, B. A. (1996). Supported inclusion. In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism (pp. 331-342). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
18.
Koegel, R. L., Dunlap, G., & Dyer, K. (1980). Intertrial interval duration and learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 91-99.
19.
Koegel, R. L., Dyer, K., & Bell, L. K. (1987). The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children’s social behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243-252.
20.
Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language paradigm for non-verbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187-200.
21.
Koegel, R. L., Rincover, A., & Egel, A. L. (1982). Educating and understanding autistic children. San Diego, CA: College Hill.
22.
Krug, D. A., Arick, J. R., & Almond, P. J. (1993). Autism screening instrument for educational planning (2nd ed.) Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
23.
Luce, S. C., & Dyer, K. (1995). Providing effective transitional programming to individuals with autism. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 36-52.
24.
Maurice, C., Green, G., & Luce, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Behavioral intervention for young children with autism. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
25.
O’Neill, E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., & Sprague, J. R. (1990). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A practical assessment guide. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.
26.
Rogers-Warren, A., & Warren, S. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly trained language in children. Behavior Modification, 4, 361-382.
27.
Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1990). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
28.
Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Interview edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
29.
Voeltz, L. M., & Evans, I. M. (1983). Educational validity: Procedures to evaluate outcomes in programs for severely handicapped learners. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8(1), 3-15.
30.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
