Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), a 25-item rating scale, was developed to identify the function(s) of maladaptive behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities. The authors adapted it for use with individuals with serious mental illness who engage in maladaptive behavior and assessed the psychometric characteristics of the new scale (Questions About Behavioral Function in Mental Illness; QABF-MI) in a sample of 135 adults with serious mental illness from three inpatient psychiatric hospitals. Staff most familiar with each person rated each item on a 5-point Likert-type rating scale, and the ratings were subjected to a number of psychometric analyses. The results of factor analyses provided a conceptually meaningful five-factor solution: physical discomfort, social attention, tangible reinforcement, escape, and nonsocial reinforcement. Congruence between the five factors derived with the QABF-MI and the corresponding factors in the original QABF was perfect. The results indicated that the QABF-MI has robust psychometric properties and may be useful as a screening tool for determining the nature of the variables that maintain maladaptive behavior exhibited by individuals with serious mental illness.

Keywords

Questions About Behavioral Function in Mental Illness QABF-MI screening tool for maladaptive behavior rating scale

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arrindell, W. , & van der Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to-variables ratio in factor and component analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 165-178.

Carr, E. G. (1994). Emerging themes in the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 393-399.

Carr, E. G. , Dunlap, G. , Horner, R. H. , Koegel, R. L. , Turnbull, A. P. , Sailor, W. , et al. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 4-16.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Curtis, W. J. , & Singh, N. N. (1997). The psychometric characteristics of the Henderson Environmental Learning Process Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 280-291.

Davidson, L. , O’Connell, M. J. , Tondora, J. , Lawless, M. , & Evans, A. C. (2005). Recovery in serious mental illness: A new wine or just a new bottle? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 480-487.

DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Iwata, B. , Dorsey, M. , Slifer, K. , Bauman, K. , & Richman, G. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 1-20.

Kass, R. , & Tinsley, H. (1979). Factor analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 11, 120-138.

10.

Martin, N. T. , Gaffan, E. A. , & Williams, T. (1999). Experimental functional analyses for challenging behavior: A study of validity and reliability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 125-146.

11.

Matson, J. L. , Bamburg, J. W. , Cherry, K. E. , & Paclawskyj, T. R. (1999). A validity study on the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) scale: Predicting treatment success for self-injury, aggression, and stereotypes. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 163-176.

12.

Matson, J. L. , & Singh, A. N. (2005). User’s guide: Questions About Behavioral Function in Mental Illness (QABF-MI). Baton Rouge, LA: Disability Consultants, LLC.

13.

Matson, J. L. , & Vollmer, T. R. (1995). User’s guide: Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF). Baton Rouge, LA: Disability Consultants, LLC.

14.

Matson, J. L. , Vollmer, T. R. , Paclawskyj, T. R. , Smiroldo, B. B. , Applegate, H. R. , & Stallings, S. (1996, September). Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF): An instrument to assess functional properties of problem behaviors. Poster presented at the 22nd Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco.

15.

McGraw, K. O. , & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some interclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1, 30-46.

16.

Nicholson, J. , Konstantinidi, E. , & Furniss, F. (2006). On some psychometric properties of the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) scale. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 337-352.

17.

O’Neill, R. E. , Horner, R. H. , Albin, R. W. , Sprague, J. R. , Storey, K. , & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

18.

Oswald, D. P. , Ellis, C. R. , Singh, N. N. , & Singh, Y. N. (1994). Self-injury. In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Autism in children and adults: Etiology, assessment and intervention (pp. 147-160). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

19.

Paclawskyj, T. R. , Matson, J. L. , Rush, K. S. , Smalls, Y. , & Vollmer, T. R. (2000). Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF): A behavior checklist for functional assessment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 223-229.

20.

Paclawskyj, T. R. , Matson, J. L. , Rush, K. S. , Smalls, Y. , & Vollmer, T. R. (2001). Assessment of the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function scale with analogue functional analysis and the Motivation Assessment Scale. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 484-494.

21.

Shogren, K. A. , & Rojahn, J. (2003). Convergent reliability and validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function and the Motivation Assessment Scale: A replication study. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 15, 367-375.

22.

Singh, N. N. , & Van Tosh, L. (2005, December). Person/family-centered planning within mandated treatment settings. Paper presented at the National Consensus Meeting on Person/Family-Centered Planning, Washington, DC.

23.

Sturmey, P. (1995). Analog baselines: A critical review of methodology. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 269-284.

24.

Toogood, S. , & Timlin, K. (1996). The functional assessment of challenging behavior: A comparison of informant-based, experimental, and descriptive methods. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 206-222.