This study aims to explore whether an introductory undergraduate course in Public Administration might be an appropriate educational tool for enhancing public service motivation (PSM) among undergraduate students. A quasi-experimental design involves surveying participants both before and after the intervention (taking an Introduction to Public Administration course) to examine whether their levels of PSM increase as a result of the intervention. The hypotheses were tested by comparing 96 students exposed to an intervention (experimental group) with 166 students who were not exposed (control group). There was no significant change in the total score of PSM and its individual dimensions before and after the intervention in both groups, and so the Introduction to Public Administration course was not effective in enhancing the level of PSM. The implications and limitations of this quasi-experiment are also discussed.
BabbieE (2013) The Practice of Social Research. 13th ed.Belmont: Wadsworth.
2.
Blom-HansenJMortonRSerritzlewS (2015) Experiments in public management research. International Public Management Journal18(2): 151–170.
3.
BozemanBSuX (2015) Public service motivation concepts and theory: a critique. Public Administration Review75(5): 700–710.
4.
BrightL (2016) Public service motivation and socialization in graduate education. Teaching Public Administration34(3): 284–306.
5.
CamilleriE (2007) Antecedents affecting public service motivation. Personnel Review36(3): 356–377.
6.
CampbellDTStanleyJC (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
7.
CarrizalesTBennettLV (2013) A public service education: A review of undergraduate programs with a community and service focus. Journal of Public Affairs Education19(2): 309–323.
8.
CelioCIDurlakJDymnickiA (2011) A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education34(2): 164–181.
9.
ChenCAChenDYLiaoZP, et al. (2020) Winnowing put high-PSM candidates: The adverse selection effect of competitive public service exams. International Public Management Journal23(4): 443–464.
10.
ChenCAHsiehCWChenDY (2021) Can training enhance public employees’ public service motivation? A pretest–posttest design. Review of Public Personnel Administration41(1): 194–215.
11.
ChetkovichC (2003) What’s in a sector? The shifting career plans of public policy students. Public Administration Review63(6): 660–674.
12.
ChoiS (2020) Korean civil service systems from recruitment to retirement. In: MoonCMoonMJ (eds) Routledge Handbook of Korean Politics and Public Administration. London: Routledge, 259–274.
13.
ChristensenRKPaarlbergLPerryJL (2017) Public service motivation research: lessons for practice. Public Administration Review77(4): 529–542.
14.
CookTDCampbellDT (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
15.
DickeLDowdenSTorresJ (2004) Successful service learning: a matter of ideology. Journal of Public Affairs Education10(3): 199–208.
16.
DinourLMKuscinJ (2021) Charity-and project-based service learning models increase public service motivation outcomes among dietetic students in a community nutrition course. Public Health Nutrition24(13): 4268–4276.
17.
EsteveMUrbigDVan WitteloostuijnA, et al. (2016) Prosocial behavior and public service motivation. Public Administration Review76(1): 177–187.
18.
FuertesV (2021) The rationale for embedding ethics and public value in public administration programmes. Teaching Public Administration. DOI: 10.1177/01447394211028275
19.
GoldeCM (1998) Beginning graduate school: explaining first-year doctoral attrition. In: AndersonMS (ed) New Directions for Higher Education, No. 101. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 55–64.
20.
Gould-WilliamsJS (2016) Managers’ motives for investing in HR practices and their implications for public service motivation: a theoretical perspective. International Journal of Manpower37(5): 764–776.
21.
GurinPDeyEHurtadoS, et al. (2002) Diversity and higher education: theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review72(3): 330–366.
22.
HansenJATummersL (2020) A systematic review of field experiments in public administration. Public Administration Review80(6): 921–931.
23.
HardinG (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science162(3859): 1243–1248.
24.
ImperialMTPerryJLKatulaMC (2007) Incorporating service learning into public affairs programs: lessons from the literature. Journal of Public Affairs Education13(2): 243–264.
25.
JamesOJilkeSVan RyzinGG (eds) (2017) Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
JilkeSVan de WalleSKimS (2016) Generating usable knowledge through an experimental approach to public administration. Public Administration Review76(1): 69–72.
27.
KimS (2010) Position islands on the career sea: an evaluation of the open competitive position system in Korea. Public Personnel Management39(3): 243–258.
28.
KimS (2017) Developing an item pool and testing measurement invariance for measuring public service motivation in Korea. International Review of Public Administration22(3): 231–244.
29.
KimSVandenabeeleW (2010) A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review70(5): 701–709.
30.
KimSVandenabeeleWWrightBE, et al. (2013) Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory23(1): 79–102.
31.
KjeldsenAM (2012) Vocational study and public service motivation: disentangling the socializing effects of higher education. International Public Management Journal15(4): 500–524.
32.
LeeGChoiDL (2016) Does public service motivation influence the college students’ intention to work in the public sector? Evidence from Korea. Review of Public Personnel Administration36(2): 145–163.
33.
LeeHJKimMYParkSM, et al. (2020) Public service motivation and innovation in the Korean and Chinese public sectors: exploring the role of confucian values and social capital. International Public Management Journal23(4): 496–534.
34.
MoynihanDPPandeySK (2007) The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review67(1): 40–53.
35.
Myers-LiptonSJ (1998) Effect of a comprehensive service-learning program on college students’ civic responsibility. Teaching Sociology26(4): 243–258.
36.
NeumannOSchottC (2021) Behavioral effects of public service motivation among citizens: testing the case of digital co-production. International Public Management Journal. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2021.1937413
37.
O’RiordanJ (2013) Public Service Motivation. [State of the Public Service Research Series]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
38.
PerryJL (1996) Measuring public service motivation: an assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6(1): 5–22.
39.
PerryJL (1997) Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory7(2): 181–197.
40.
PerryJL (2000) Bringing society in: toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(2): 471–488.
41.
PerryJLBrudneyJLCourseyD, et al. (2008) What drives morally committed citizens? A study of the antecedents of public service motivation. Public Administration Review68(3): 445–458.
42.
PerryJLHondghemA (eds) (2008) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
PerryJLVandenabeeleW (2008) Behavioral dynamics: institutions, identities, and self-regulation. In: PerryJLHondeghemA (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56–79.
44.
PerryJLVandenabeeleW (2015) Public service motivation research: Achievements, challenges, and future directions. Public Administration Review75(5): 692–699.
45.
PerryJLWiseLR (1990) The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review50(3): 367–373.
46.
PonomariovBMcCabeB (2017) Professionalism vs. public service motivation: can public administration education alleviate the tension?Administrative Theory and Praxis39(2): 80–99.
47.
RiceKLBrownJR (1998) Transforming educational curriculum and service learning. Journal of Experiential Education21(3): 140–146.
48.
RitzABrewerGANeumannO (2016) Public service motivation: a systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review76(3): 414–426.
49.
RitzAWaldnerC (2011) Competing for future leaders: a study of attractiveness of public sector organizations to potential job applicants. Review of Public Personnel Administration31(3): 291–316.
50.
SeiderSCRabinowiczSAGillmorSC (2011) The impact of philosophy and theology service-learning experiences upon the public service motivation of participating college students. The Journal of Higher Education82(5): 597–628.
51.
SundellA (2014) Are formal civil service examinations the most meritocratic way to recruit civil servants? Not in all countries. Public Administration92(2): 440–457.
52.
UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence (2014) Motivation of Public Service Officials: Insights for Practitioners. Singapore: UNDP GCPSE.
53.
VandenabeeleW (2011) Who wants to deliver public service? Do institutional antecedents of public service motivation provide an answer?Review of Public Personnel Administration31(1): 87–107.
54.
VogelDKrollA (2016) The stability and change of PSM-related values across time: testing theoretical expectations against panel data. International Public Management Journal19(1): 53–77.
55.
WaldsteinFAReiherTC (2001) Service-learning and students’ personal and civic development. Journal of Experiential Education24(1): 7–13.
56.
WrightBEGrantAM (2010) Unanswered questions about public service motivation: designing research to address key issues of emergence and effects. Public Administration Review70(5): 691–700.
