Current world events demand public affairs leadership training that generates among professionals a sense of capability, agency, and responsibility to engage in complex public problems. In this paper, we describe a unique course operated in the US focused on achieving these learning outcomes. It uses an unconventional schedule and course design that leverages information communication technologies to support learning. Its integrated model combines conventionally distinct courses with a pedagogical approach stressing experiential learning, personal reflection, and critical thinking. The paper describes the teaching practices used in the course, as well as offers three sources of evidence about what results from its implementation.
BabbSStewartCJohnsonR (2010) Constructing communication in blended learning environments: Students’ perceptions of good practice in hybrid courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching6(4): 735–53.
3.
BaldwinCLinneaA (2010) The Circle Way: A Leader in Every Chair. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
4.
BardachE (2012) A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
5.
BransfordJDBrownALCockingRR (eds) (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academies Press.
6.
BrownJIsaacsD (2005) The World Café: Shaping Our Futures through Conversations That Matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
7.
CaineRNCaineG (2011) Natural Learning for a Connected World: Education, Technology, and the Human Brain. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
8.
CrosbyBCBrysonJM (2010) Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. The Leadership Quarterly21(2): 211–30.
9.
DeweyJ (1938) Experience and Education. New York: MacMillan.
10.
DillonCL (1996) Distance education research and continuing professional education: Reframing questions for the emerging information infrastructure. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions16:5–13.
11.
GinnMHHammondA (2012) Online education in public affairs: Current state and emerging issues. Journal of Public Affairs Education18(2): 247–70.
12.
HoALuLThurmaierK (2006) Testing the reluctant professor’s hypothesis: Evaluating a blended learning approach to distance education. Journal of Public Affairs Education12(1): 81–102.
13.
HokansonBMillerC (2009) Role-based design: A contemporary framework for innovation and creativity in instructional design. Educational Technology49(2): 21–28.
14.
HowardGSRalphKGulanickN. (1979) Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Applied Psychological Measurement3: 1–23.
15.
KolbAYKolbDA (2013) Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education4(2): 193–212.
16.
KnowlesMS (1980) The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge Books.
17.
KrajcikJBlumenfeldP (2006) Project-Based Learning. In: SawyerRK (ed) Project-Based Learning: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Process, pp 267–283.
18.
MeansBToyanmaYMurphyR. (2009) Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
19.
MillerSMMillerKL (2000) Theoretical and practical considerations in the design of web-based instruction. In: AbbeyB (ed) Instructional and Cognitive Impacts of Web-Based Education. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp 156–77.
20.
OwenH (1997) Open Space Technology: A User’s Guide. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
21.
PalmerP (2009) A Hidden Wholeness: The Journey Toward an Undivided Life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
ParksSD (2005) Leadership Can be Taught: A Bold Approach for a Complex World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
23.
PrattDD (1988) Andragogy as a relational construct. Adult Education Quarterly38(3): 160–181.
24.
PrattDD (1993) Andragogy after twenty-five years. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (57): 15–23.
25.
RaelinJACoghlanD (2006) Developing managers as learners and researchers: Using action learning and action research. Journal of Management Education30(5): 670–689.
26.
RevanR (1980) The Origins and Grown of Action Learning. Bromley: Chartwell Bratt.
27.
SandfortJMoultonS (2015) Effective Implementation in Practice: Integrating Public Policy and Management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
SandfortJ (2013) Creating meaningful learning communities: Applying art of hosting in mid-career public affairs education. In: LundquistLSandfortJRLopezC. (eds) Cultivating Change in the Academy: Practicing the Art of Hosting conversations that matter within the University of Minnesota. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. Available at: http://purl.umn.edu/155523
29.
SchonDA (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
SegraveSHoltD (2003) Contemporary learning environments: Designing e-learning for education in the professions. Distance Education24(1): 7.
31.
SheaPSwanKLiCS. (2005) Developing learning community in online asynchronous college sources: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks9(4): 59–82.
32.
TamimRBernardEBrookhovskiP. (2011) What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research81(1): 4–28.
33.
WeinsteinK (1995). Action Learning: A Journey in discovery and Development. London: Harper Collins.
34.
WheatleyMFrezeD (2011) Walk Out Walk On: A Learning Journey into Communities Daring to Live the Future Now. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Keohler Publishers.
35.
WholeyJHatryHPNewcomerK (2010) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (3rd edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
