As the integration of academic teaching and research with communities of practice is considered a major concern of public administration since its founding as a field, professional programmes were established on the premise that there is a positive relationship between practice and scholarship. However, the balance between them is considered delicate as they differ in the context, processes and purposes of their practices. The respective members not only use different vocabularies but base their professional action and reasoning on different logics. This paper develops the idea that part-time professional programmes might be conceptualized as a separate (temporary) system with a distinct frame of reference and language that is governed by its own logic but linked to the two other systems of scholarship and practice. The practical consequences of this approach are explored with regard to the role and objectives of research in professional programmes and the difficulties to achieve them.
AstleyWGZammutoRF (1992) Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science3(4): 443–460.
2.
AugierMMarchJG (2007) The pursuit of relevance in management education. California Management Review49(3): 129–146.
3.
BartunekJMGordonJRWeathersbyRP (1983) Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. Academy of Management Review8(2): 273–284.
4.
BartunekJMRynesSL (2014) Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management40(5): 1181–1201.
5.
BeckerHS (1967) Whose side are we on?Social Problems14(3): 239–247.
6.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1967) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
7.
BettsJ (2004) Theology, therapy or picket line? What’s the ‘good’ of reflective practice in management education?Reflective Practice5(2): 239–251.
8.
BeyerJMTriceHM (1982) The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly27(4): 591–622.
9.
BrouckerB (2015) Defining the impact of public administration programmes for public sector organizations. Teaching Public Administration33(2): 193–207.
10.
BugosGE (1993) Manufacturing certainty: Testing and program* management for the F-4 Phantom II. Social Studies of Science23(2): 265–300.
11.
CairneyP (2015) How can policy theory have an impact on policymaking? The role of theory-led academic–practitioner discussions. Teaching Public Administration33(1): 22–39.
12.
ChristensenCMCarlilePR (2009) Course research: Using the case method to build and teach management theory. Academy of Management Learning & Education8(2): 240–251.
13.
CollinsHEvansR (2009) Rethinking expertise. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
14.
HitzlerR (1994) Wissen und Wesen des Experten: ein Annäherungsversuch - zur Einleitung. In: HitzlerRHonerAMaederC (eds) Expertenwissen: die institutionalisierte Kompetenz zur Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Opladen Westdeutscher Verlag, pp.13–30.
15.
JarzabkowskiPWilsonDC (2006) Actionable Strategy Knowledge: A practice Perspective. European Management Journal24(5): 348–367.
16.
KieserALeinerL (2009) Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies46(3): 516–533.
17.
KieserALeinerL (2012) Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research. Journal of Management Inquiry21(1): 14–28.
18.
KieserANicolaiASeidlD (2015) The practical relevance of management research: Turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. The Academy of Management Annals9(1): 143–233.
19.
KnassmüllerMMeyerRE (2013) What kind of reflection do we need in public management?Teaching Public Administration31(1): 81–95.
20.
Knorr-CetinaKD (1977) Policymakers’ use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? In: WeissCH (ed) Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington/Toronto: Lexington Books, pp.165–182.
21.
LazegaE (1992) Micropolitics of Knowledge: Communication and Indirect Control in Workgroups. New York: de Gruyter.
22.
LefsrudLMMeyerRE (2012) Science or science fiction? Professionals’ discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies33(11): 1477–1506.
23.
LuhmannN (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
24.
LuhmannN (2005/1989) Communication barriers in management consulting. In: SeidlDBeckerKH (eds) Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies. Copenhagen, Denmark: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press, pp.251–264.
25.
MeyerREEgger-PeitlerIHöllererMA. (2014) Of bureaucrats and passionate managers; Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration92(4): 861–885.
26.
MeyerREHammerschmidG (2006) Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A Managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. The American Behavioral Scientist49(7): 1000–1014.
NicolaiASeidlD (2010) That’s relevant! Different forms of practical relevance in management science. Organization Studies31(9-10): 1257–1285.
29.
PearceJLHuangL (2012) The decreasing value of our research to management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education11(2): 247–262.
30.
PelzDC (1978) Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy. In: YingerJMCutlerSJ (eds) Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View. New York: Free Press, pp.346–357.
31.
PerinC (2005) Shouldering Risk: The Culture of Control in the Nuclear Power Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
PetersonMJ (2009) An ecologist’s response to the SIU Campaign: The role of natural scientists in environmental movements. In: EndresDSprainLMPetersonTR (eds) Social Movements to Address Climate Change: Local Steps for Global Action. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, pp.361–387.
33.
PollettaF (1999) “Free spaces” in collective action. Theory and Society28(1): 1–38.
34.
PosnerPL (2009) The pracademic: An agenda for re-engaging practitioners and academics. Public Budgeting & Finance29(1): 12–26.
35.
PowellWWSandholtzKW (2012) Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal6(2): 94–115.
36.
QuinnB (2013) Reflexivity and education for public managers. Teaching Public Administration31(1): 6–17.
37.
QuinnBWennesG (2008) Mind-sets, mirrors and mid-career education. International Journal of Public Sector Management21(4): 353–367.
38.
RichRF (1977) Use of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action vs. knowledge for understanding. In: WeissCH (ed) Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp.199–233.
39.
RittelHWJWebberMM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences4(2): 155–169.
40.
SchönDA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
41.
SchröterERöberM (2015) Values, competencies and public sector training: The value base of administrative modernization. Journal of Public Affairs Education21(1): 25–40.
42.
SeidlD (2007) General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: A systemic-discursive perspective. Organization Studies28(2): 197–218.
43.
Serrano-VelardeKKrückenG (2012) Private sector consultants and public universities: The challenges of cross-sectoral knowledge transfers. European Journal of Education47(2): 277–289.
44.
TushmanMLFenollosaAMcGrathDN. (2007) Relevance and rigor: Executive education as a lever in shaping practice and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education6(3): 345–362.
45.
Van De VenAH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
Van De VenAHJohnsonPE (2006) Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review31(4): 802–821.
47.
van der MeerF-BMarksP (2013) Teaching and learning reflection in MPA programs: Towards a strategy. Teaching Public Administration31(1): 42–54.
48.
van der MeerF-BRingelingA (2010) An education strategy for practitioners in public administration master’s programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education16(1): 77–93.
49.
WillkeH (1998) Organisierte Wissensarbeit. Zeitschrift für Soziologie27(3): 161–177.
