Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Higher education accrediting bodies are increasing the emphasis on assessing student learning outcomes as opposed to teaching methodology. The purpose of this article is to describe the process used by Troy University’s Master of Public Administration program to change their assessment approach from a course learning objective perspective to a student learning outcome perspective as they prepare for specialized reaccreditation through the Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs and Administration. The article illustrates how the program moved from measuring individual course learning objectives to a more holistic approach that focuses on a set of universal required competencies that relate to the program’s mission and public service values. Also described are the challenges in making this paradigm shift.

Keywords

accreditation assessment competencies course learning objectives student learning outcomes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2006) Assessing General Education Programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Anderson

Krathwohl

(2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman Publishers.

CHEA (Council for Higher Education Accreditation) Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance (2003) Statement of mutual responsibilities for student learning outcomes: Accreditation, institutions, and programs. Retrieved 14 October 2013 from http://www.chea.org/pdf/StmntStudentLearningOutcomes9-03.pdf.

Jennings

Jr (1989) Accountability, program quality, outcome assessment, and graduate education for public affairs and public administration. Public Administration Review 42(5): 438–446.

Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs and Administration (2012) COPRA policy statement. Retrieved 17 July 2013from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/NS/guidance.asp.

Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs and Administration (2013a) About NASPAA. Retrieved 17 July 2013 from http://www.naspaa.org/about_naspaa/naspaa.asp.

Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs and Administration (2013b) NASPAA accreditation standards. Retrieved 23 January 2014 from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/NS/naspaastandards.asp.

Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs and Administration (2013c) Old NASPAA standards & old self study instructions (pre-2009). Retrieved 23 January 2014 from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/NS/pre2009standards.asp.

Newcomer

Allen

(2008) Adding value in the public interest. Available at http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/NS/doc/AddingValueinthePublicInterest.pdf.

10.

Powell

Piskulich

Saint-Germain

(2011) Expectations for student learning outcomes assessment for NASPAA-COPRA accreditation. Retrieved 8 August 2013 from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/NS/24%20COPRA%20Appendix%204%20White%20Paper%20Competencies.pdf.

11.

Soundarajan

(2004) Program assessment and program improvement: Closing the loop. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29(5): 597–610.

12.

Troy University (2013) MPA program mission statement. Available at http://trojan.troy.edu/artsandsciences/politicalscience/mpa/index.html.

13.

Voorhees

(2001) Competency-based learning models: A necessary future. New Directions For Institutional Research 110: 5–13.

Developing a competency-based assessment approach for student learning

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References