This article reviews Lipsky's Street-level Bureaucracy, a classic work of central importance to the discipline and teaching of public administration. The paper argues that Lipsky's portrayal of the dilemmas faced by front line workers challenges us to focus on the ethical, professional and personal development of student-practitioners.
BehnR (1978) Closing a government facility. Public Administration ReviewJuly/August: 332–8.
2.
BrandonT (2005) Classic review: Street-level bureaucracy. Disability and Society20(7): 779–83.
3.
Cabinet Office (2011) Open Public Services White Paper. London: Stationery Office.
4.
DuboisV (2010) The Bureaucrat and the Poor: Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
5.
ElliottD (2009) The failure of organizational learning from crisis: A matter of life and death. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management17(3): 158–68.
6.
EvansT (2010) Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-level Bureaucracy. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
7.
FlyvbjergB (2001) Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and how It Can Succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
HallidaySBurnsNHuttonNMcNeillFTataC (2009) Street-level bureaucracy, interprofessional relations, and coping mechanisms: A study of criminal justice social workers in the sentencing process. Law and Policy31(4): 405–28.
9.
HarveyJ (1988) The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement. Organisational Dynamics17(1): 17–43.
10.
HogwoodBGunnL (1984) Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
KeiserL (2010) Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ decision making: Determining eligibility in the social security disability program. Public Administration ReviewMarch/April: 247–57.
12.
KosarK (2011) Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas endure. Public Administration ReviewMarch/April: 299–302.
13.
LandsbergenD (2004) Screen level bureaucracy: Databases as public records. Government Information Quarterly21: 25–50.
14.
LeaT (2008) Bureaucrats and Bleeding Hearts: Indigenous Health in Northern Australia. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales Press.
15.
LevineCRubinIWolohojianG (1982) Managing organizational retrenchment: Preconditions, deficiencies and adaptations in the public sector. Administration and Society14: 101–36.
16.
LipskyM (1980) Street-level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
ManningPvan MaanenJ (eds) (1978) Policing: A View from the Street. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
18.
MarstonG (2006) Employment services in an age of e-government. Information, Communication and Society9(1): 83–103.
19.
MarrisPReinM (1972) Dilemmas of Social Reform (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
20.
MayPWinterS (2007) Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19: 453–76.
21.
Maynard-MoodySMushenoM (2000) State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(2): 329–58.
22.
Maynard-MoodySMushenoM (2003) Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23.
MillerDMcFarlandC (1987) Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Psychology53(2): 298–305.
24.
MishraR (1984) Welfare State in Crisis: Social Thought and Social Change. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
25.
NielsenV (2006) Are street-level bureaucrats compelled or enticed to cope?Public Administration84(4): 861–89.
26.
OffeC (1982) Some contradictions of the modern welfare state. Critical Social Policy2(5): 7–16.
27.
PetcheyRWilliamsJCarterY (2008) From street-level bureaucrats to street-level policy entrepreneurs? Central policy and local action in lottery-funded community cancer care. Social Policy and Administration42(1): 59–76.
28.
PressmanJWildavskyA (1973) Implementation. How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland; or why it’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at all, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
ProudfootJMcCannE (2008) At street level: Bureaucratic practice in the management of urban neighbourhood change. Urban Geography29(4): 348–70.
30.
RosenhanD (1973) On being sane in insane places. Science179: 250–8.
31.
RoweM (2002) Discretion and inconsistency: Implementing the social fund. Public Money and Management22(4): 19–24.
32.
SchonD (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
33.
TaylorIKellyJ (2006) Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: Re-visiting Lipsky. International Journal of Public Sector Management19(7): 629–42.
34.
TownsendP (1962) The meaning of poverty. British Journal of Sociology13(3): 210–27.
35.
Watkins-HayesC (2009) The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
