The concept of using amplitude variations with offset (AVO) for the direct detection of hydrocarbons was introduced to the oil and gas industry in the early eighties. In the late eighties Rutherford and Williams proposed a model representing different classes in normally pressured gas sand formations. In this paper, a model for the AVO response for overpressured clastic formations is proposed based on the rationale that abnormally high pore fluid pressure leaves its own pronounced effects on clastic formations: such as abrupt increase in porosities, decrease in interval velocities, high fluid content, and lower bulk densities. The implication is that overpressured formations should show a different trend for AVO response compared to normally pressured formations. The AVO response in overpressured formation was modeled using both synthetic well data representing an overpressured sandstone and also typical values of seismic velocities reported from overpressured formations. The results suggest that a characteristic polarity reversal from negative to positive reflection coefficients can be observed as the offset increases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-ShaiebZ., PucketteJ. O., AbdallaA. A., and ElyP. B., 1994, Megacompartment Complex in the Anadarko Basin: A Completely Sealed Overpressured Phenomenon, in OrtolevaP. J., ed., Basin Compartments and Seals: AAPG Memoir 61, Tulsa, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 55–69.
2.
BarkerM. R., DoserD. I., and LuoM., 1991, Geologic and oil field controls on earthquakes in the War-Wink field, Delaware basin: West Texas Geological Society Bulletin, v. 31, p. 5–12.
3.
BatzleM., and WangZ., 1992, Seismic properties of pore fluids: Geophysics, v. 57, p. 1396–1408.
4.
BowersG. L., 1995, Pore Pressure Estimation from Velocity Data: Accounting for Overpressure Mechanisms Besides Undercompaction: SPE Drilling and Completion. v. 6, p. 89–95.
5.
CastagnaJ. P., BatzleM. L., and EastwoodR. L., 1985, Relationships between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks: Geophysics. v. 50. p. 571–581.
6.
DuttaN., 1987a, Editor's introduction to chapter 1 – Geopressure Environments and Basic Pressure Concepts, in DuttaN., ed., Geopressure, Tulsa, Soc. Expl. Geophys., p. 3–8.
7.
DuttaN., [Ed], 1987b, Geopressure, Tulsa, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, p. 365 PP
8.
EatonB. A., 1975, The equation for geopressured prediction from well logs: SPE-AIME 50'th Annual Meeting, p. 5.
9.
FertlW. H., 1976, Abnormal formation pressures, Implications to exploration, drilling, and production of oil and gas resources: Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Elsevier. p. 382
10.
FertlW. H., ChapmanR. E., and HotzR. F., 1994, Studies in Abnormal Pressures: Amsterdam, Elsevier, 454 p.
11.
FertlW. H., and ChilingarianG. V., 1977, Importance of Abnormal Formation Pressures:Journal of Petroleum Technology, 29, 4, p. 347–354.
12.
FosterJ. B., and WhalenH. E., 1966, Estimation of Formation Pressures From Electrical Surveys - Offshore Louisiana:Journal of Petroleum Technology, p. 165–171.
13.
HeW., and AndersonR. N., 1992, A seismic amplitude analysis approach for mapping the top-of-overpressure surface in the Pleistocene, Offshore Louisiana:EOS, Transactions. American Geophysical Union, v. 73, p. 304.
HiltermanF., 1990, Is AVO the seismic signature of lithology? A case history of Ship Shoal-South Addition:The Leading Edge, v. 9, p. 15–22.
16.
HottmannC. E., and JohnsonR. K., 1965, Estimation of Formation Pressures from Log-Derived Shale Properties:Journal of Petroleum Technology, p. 717–722.
17.
JordenJ. R., and ShirleyO. J., 1966, Application of Drilling Performance Data to Overpressure Detection:Journal of Petroleum Technology, p. 1387–1394.
18.
LercheI., 1990, Basin Analysis. Quantitative Methods. Vol. 1: Academic Press, San Diego, 562 p.
19.
LouieJ. N., and AsadA. M., 1994, Seismic Amplitude versus Offset (AVO) Character of the Overpressure System Transition Zones, in OrtolevaP. J., ed., Basin Compartments and Seals: AAPG Memoir 61, Tulsa, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 131–137.
20.
LuoM., BarkerM R., and LeMoneD. V., 1994, Distribution and Generation of the Overpressure System, Eastern Delaware Basin, Western Texas and Southern New Mexico:American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Bulletin, v. 78, p. 1386–1405.
21.
OrtolevaP. J., 1994, Basin Compartments and Seals, AAPG Memoir 61, Tulsa, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 477.
22.
OstranderW. J., 1984, Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at normal angle of incidence: Geophysics, v. 49, p. 1637–1648.
23.
RubeyW. W., and HubbertM. K., 1959, Role of Fluid Pressure in Mechanics of Overthrusts Faulting. II. Overthrust Belt in Geosynclinal Area of Western Wyoming in Light of Fluid-Pressure Hypothesis:Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v. 70, p. 167–206.
24.
RutherfordS. R., and WilliamsR. H., 1989, Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands:Geophysics, v. 54, p. 680–688.
25.
ShueyR., 1985, A simplification of Zoeppritz equations:Geophysics, v. 50, p. 609–614.
26.
SurdamR. C., 1997, Seals, traps, and the petroleum system, AAPG Memoir 67, Tulsa.American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 317.
27.
TathamR. H., 1982, Vp/Vs and lithology:Geophysics, v. 47, p. 336–344.
28.
TathamR. H., and StoffaP. L., 1976, Vp/Vs – A potential hydrocarbon indicator:Geophysics, v. 41, p. 837–849.
29.
TerzaghiK., and PeckR. B., 1948, Soil mechanics in engineering practice: New York, Elsevier, 566 p.
30.
VermR., LiangL., and HiltermanF., 1998, Significance of overpressure in predicting lithology:The Leading Edge, v. 17, 2, p. 227–234.
31.
WyllieM. R. J., GregoryA. R., and GardnerL. W., 1956, Elastic wave velocities in Heterogeneous and Porous Media:Geophysics, v. XXI, p. 41–70.
32.
YoshidaC., IkedaS., and EatonB., 1996, An Investigative Study of Recent Technologies Used for Prediction, Detection, and Evaluation of Abnormal formation Pressure and Fracture Pressure in North and South America: IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference.
