Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Renewable energy systems have emerged as a viable option to mitigate the environmental impacts of traditional fossil fuels. However, the intermittent nature of these renewables, such as solar and wind, makes it challenging to ensure a stable energy supply using only one type. Therefore, combining more than a single technology offers significant advantages in addressing the limitations associated with each individual system. Nevertheless, developing these systems requires substantial financial investments, making it crucial to identify the most suitable locations prior to installing them. In this article, the prime objective was to propose a preliminary evaluation of land suitability for constructing solar and wind hybrid facilities (PV–wind, PV–CSP, and CS–wind) in Tataouine, southern Tunisia. To this end, a GIS-based MCDA methodology was developed based on an extensive literature review and experts’ feedback while considering climate, topography, accessibility, and environmental factors. The results obtained revealed that the optimal area for a CSP–PV hybrid system is about 793 km², indicating that this combination has the highest potential in terms of available resources and compatibility. On the other hand, well-suited locations for hosting CSP–wind and PV–wind systems covered areas of 412 and 333 km², respectively. Such specific locations are capable of generating an annual technical potential of 316.169, 91.252, and 62.970 TWh for CSP–PV, CSP–wind, and PV–wind, respectively. Interestingly, comprising almost all of the most appropriate sites, Remada and Dhiba stand as the ideal locations for accommodating such hybrid systems. Considering this outcome, Tataouine can position itself as a model for renewable energy adoption in Tunisia. Therefore, it is imperative for policymakers, investors, and local communities to collaborate and embrace these hybrid systems to capitalize on this immense potential and pave the way for a greener and more prosperous future.

Keywords

GIS MCDA PV WIND CSP

Introduction

In recent years, significant changes in the energy sector have resulted in a reevaluation of our energy needs and production and consumption methods. This has led to the establishment of a new energy system. The dominance of fossil fuels such as natural gas is gradually being questioned due to issues like pollution, dependence on producer states and cartels, rising prices, resource depletion, and reserve exhaustion (Capellán-Pérez et al., 2014; Day and Day, 2017; Höök and Tang, 2013). As a result, it has become essential to control consumption while promoting new alternatives like renewable energy sources (RESs), which are free from carbon emissions (Esposito and Romagnoli, 2023; Kung et al., 2019). This transition toward cleaner sources of energy is shaping a new energy landscape characterized by the relocation of energy systems and the emergence of new players and sources of energy. Driven by the need to promote accessible and cost-effective energy while also prioritizing environmental conservation, RESs have been gaining momentum over the years (Gudlaugsson et al., 2023; Güney, 2021; Kuleli Pak et al., 2017; Majeed et al., 2023). With a focus on regional development strategies, efficient consumption practices, and ensuring a reliable supply, many countries are currently undergoing an energy transition process. However, one prominent drawback of these RESs is their reliance on variable weather and climatic conditions. The intermittent nature of renewable power from sources such as wind and solar makes it challenging to ensure a stable energy supply using only one type of RES (Sovacool, 2009; Zhou et al., 2018). In this context, the combination of solar and wind technologies within hybrid systems offers significant advantages in addressing the limitations associated with each individual system (Liu et al., 2022; Muchiri et al., 2023; Spiru, 2023). By integrating these complementary sources, hybrid systems have the potential to provide a more consistent and stable power supply, taking advantage of varying climatic conditions throughout different times of the day or year (Monforti et al., 2014; Slusarewicz and Cohan, 2018). This leads to enhanced overall system efficiency through optimized resource utilization. For example, during periods when there is high sunlight but low winds (or vice versa), surplus electricity from one source can compensate for deficits from another through intelligent grid management or energy storage solutions such as batteries (Ju et al., 2017). Additionally, the implementation of hybrid renewable energy systems contributes to grid stability and resilience, providing added reliability in power supply (Mishra et al., 2023; Saidi, 2020).

Tunisia, as a net importer of energy, is grappling with a multitude of challenges in its energy system. The country faces a persistent deficit due to high demand and limited local reserves. Currently, the energy mix heavily relies on natural gas (97%), while renewable sources contribute less than 3%, which includes solar, wind, and hydropower (STEG, 2022). In terms of installed capacity, Tunisia currently has 5944 MW, predominantly operated by the national state company known as STEG, with a smaller portion managed by the private Carthage Power Company. STEG's monopoly, dependence on imported energy, particularly natural gas, and heavy subsidies have all contributed to the deterioration of the power sector in Tunisia (Döring et al., 2018; Sghari and Hammami, 2016).

Despite these challenges, Tunisia enjoys significant solar potential, especially in southern regions where direct normal irradiance (DNI) and global horizontal irradiance (GHI) could reach as high as 2800 and 2600 kWh/m²/yr, respectively (Abdelrazik et al., 2022; Attig-Bahar et al., 2021). In addition, many regions in Tunisia experience consistent wind speeds ranging from 6 to 8 m/s at an altitude of 50 m. According to several reports, it has been estimated that CSP, PV, onshore, and offshore winds have a technical potential of 400, 65, 10, and 250 GWs, respectively (Ersoy and Terrapon-Pfaf, 2021; IRENA, 2021). In an attempt to capitalize on these enormous resources, enhance energy security, diversify the mix, reduce imports, and rationalize energy subsidies, the Tunisian government has committed to installing 4.7 GW (15% wind, 15% solar PV, and 5% solar CSP) of renewable energy by 2030 (Gardumi et al., 2021).

Nonetheless, the effective implementation of such a strategy requires a careful assessment for selecting well-suited sites beforehand (Elkadeem et al., 2021; Idris et al., 2022). Merely considering the availability of solar and wind potential is insufficient due to various conflicting factors that directly influence output power and costs (Badi et al., 2021; Sward et al., 2021). For example, despite excellent solar irradiation in arid desert regions, ambient temperature can be a major limiting factor because it can degrade the efficiency of PV panels (Suuronen et al., 2017). Furthermore, locating a PV or wind facility far from grid networks or transportation links would significantly increase costs. Consequently, identifying potential sites depends heavily on understanding their geographical and topographic characteristics. Therefore, detailed knowledge regarding these factors becomes crucial when evaluating the suitability of a given location (Badi et al., 2021).

The present study examines the feasibility of deploying solar and wind hybrid facilities (PV–wind, PV–CSP, and CS–wind) in the Tataouine region, southernmost Tunisia. Through a GIS-based Analytic Hierarchy Process integrated approach, this research aims to identify the most feasible locations for these renewable energy installations. It is anticipated that the outcomes of this work will provide valuable insights and aid decision-making processes regarding site selection, ultimately contributing to unlocking the region's renewable energy potential.

Literature review

Allocating an optimal site plays a pivotal role in ensuring the viability of renewable energy projects such as solar and wind facilities. However, this process presents numerous challenges that must be carefully addressed. To fully harness the potential of renewable energy within a specific region, it is essential to consider various factors beyond the availability of solar and wind resources alone (Ali et al., 2019; Asadi et al., 2023; Elkadeem et al., 2022). Elements such as topography, infrastructure capabilities, and costs significantly affect the generated power (Al Garni and Awasthi, 2017). Furthermore, regional variations in weather patterns and seasonal fluctuations introduce additional complexities when assessing solar and wind potential. Therefore, comprehensive data collection followed by rigorous analysis becomes imperative for accurately determining the energy generation capacity at a given site (Asadi et al., 2023; Al Garni and Awasthi, 2017). Nevertheless, conducting these assessments can prove challenging due to the diverse criteria that often overlap with each other during decision-making processes as outlined in Table 1. In order to navigate these complexities and make informed decisions, researchers have increasingly turned to geographic information systems integrated with multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches. These techniques have proven to be effective in identifying practical geographic locations for installing renewable energy facilities. Some of the most commonly used MCDM methods include analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy AHP (FAHP), COPRAS, DEMATEL, ELECTRE, SWARA, TOPSIS, fuzzy TOPSIS, VIKOR, WASPAS, and many other techniques.

Table 1.

Most frequently applied criteria in deploying renewable energy systems in the literature.

Criteria	Reference
Global horizontal irradiance (GHI)	Ali et al. 2019; Asadi et al. 2023; Harrucksteiner et al. 2023; Waewsak et al. 2020; Zambrano-Asanza et al. 2021
Direct normal irradiance (DNI)	Aly et al. 2017; Haddad et al., 2021; Gouareh et al., 2021; Mutume, 2023; Yushchenko et al. 2018
Wind speed	Asadi et al. 2023; Harrucksteiner et al. 2023;Waewsak et al. 2020
Ambient temperature	Elboshy et al. 2022; Günen, 2021; Ouchani et al. 2020; Zambrano-Asanza et al. 2021
Slope	Asadi et al. 2023; Effat and El-Zeiny, 2022; Elboshy et al. 2022; Elkadeem et al. 2021; Albraheem and AlAwlaqi, 2023; Zambrano-Asanza et al. 2021
Aspect orientation	Ali et al. 2019; Koc et al. 2019; Günen, 2021
Distance to grid lines	Al Garni and Awasthi 2017, Asadi et al. 2023; Badi et al. 2021; Elkadeem et al. 2021; Albraheem and AlAwlaqi, 2023; Zambrano-Asanza et al. 2021
Distance to major roads	Al Garni and Awasthi 2017, Asadi et al. 2023; Badi et al. 2021; Elkadeem et al. 2021; Albraheem and AlAwlaqi, 2023; Zambrano-Asanza et al. 2021
Distance to residential areas	Al Garni and Awasthi 2017, Asadi et al. 2023; Badi et al. 2021; Albraheem and AlAwlaqi, 2023; Zambrano-Asanza et al. 2021
Elevation	Ali et al. 2019; Badi et al. 2021; Harrucksteiner et al. 2023; Albraheem and AlAwlaqi, 2023
Land use	Ali et al. 2019; Badi et al. 2021; Harrucksteiner et al. 2023; Waewsak et al. 2020; Zambrano-Asanza et al. 2021
Population density	Majumdar and Pasqualetti, 2019; Sabo et al. 2016
protected bird areas	Ali et al. 2019; Baseer et al. 2017; Albraheem and AlAwlaqi, 2023
Distance to airports	Ali et al. 2019; Baseer et al. 2017; Harrucksteiner et al. 2023; Albraheem and AlAwlaqi, 2023
Dust storm	Alami Merrouni et al. 2018, Xiao et al. 2013
Distance to water resources	Aly et al. 2017; Mutume, 2023; Yushchenko et al., 2018

In recent years, there has been a surge in the development of comprehensive decision-making models in this field. For instance, Rezaei-Shouroki et al. (2017) proposed a comprehensive multicriteria model incorporating DEA, AHP, and FTOPSIS techniques to assess 13 different cities’ suitability as host locations for wind farms. Xu et al. (2020) employed FAHP combined with the VIKOR technique using GIS data analysis, resulting in optimized site selection for wind farms. Similarly, in another study conducted in Vietnam, Wang et al. (2021) utilized DEA, FAHP, and FWASPAS (fuzzy-weighted aggregated sum-product assessment) to identify the areas with the highest potential for wind farms. In another work, Solangi et al. (2019) successfully determined the ideal location for a solar PV power plant in Pakistan by employing F-VIKOR and AHP techniques. In Taiwan, Wang and Dang (2021) developed a two-stage approach using DEA-AHP to facilitate the construction of solar PV farms across 20 cities. Badi et al. (2021) explored the potential for solar parks in western Libya using GIS, Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, and SWARA techniques. In a very recent work, Wang et al. (2022) proposed an advanced hybrid model that combines DEA, Grey-AHP, and Grey-TOPSIS to effectively determine the optimal locations for solar power plants, specifically in Vietnam. Studies by Mutume (2023) and Haddad et al. (2021) applied AHP along with GIS to delineate the most promising sites for CSP power plants in Zimbabwe and Algeria, respectively. For a more reliable and continuous energy supply, numerous researchers have paid attention to hybrid systems owing to the intermittency and variability of single technologies. In this regard, Diemuodeke et al. (2019) developed the GIS-TOPSIS approach to determine the optimal location for wind–PV hybrid systems in southern Nigeria. Khanjarpanah et al. (2018) explored the feasibility of implementing hybrid wind and solar PV power plants by employing NDEA (network data envelopment analysis) within Iran's context. From a managerial standpoint, Yunna and Geng (2014) used a GIS-AHP-based model to allocate a well-suited location for installing solar-wind facilities in China. The same technique was utilized by Aly et al. (2017) and Yushchenko et al. (2018) to investigate the feasibility of developing solar PV–CSP systems in Tanzania and the ECOWAS region, western Africa. Table 2 depicts a variety of recently published studies addressing the application of GIS-MCDM in solar and wind site selection. Table 2 presents a number of recently published studies focusing on the application of GIS-MCDM in site selection.

Table 2.

Saaty's nine-point weighting scale.

Description	Scale of importance
Description	X _ij	X _ij
Equally important	1	1
Intermediate	2	0.500
Moderately important	3	0.333
Intermediate	4	0.250
Strongly important	5	0.200
Intermediate	6	0.167
Very strongly important	7	0.143
Intermediate	8	0.125
Extremely important	9	0.111

Unlike fuzzy models such as FAHP, FTOPSIS, and FDEMATEL, which are better suited to handle uncertainties associated with decision-making problems (Khashei-Siuki and Sharifan, 2020; Shojaeimehr and Rahmani, 2022), we opted for the AHP approach for several reasons. The AHP remains a widely used method, either on its own or in combination with other MCDM models (Ilbahar et al., 2019; Manirambona et al., 2022). The popularity of AHP can be attributed to several factors: it is a simple and easily implementable approach that can be integrated with other techniques such as TOPSIS, EDAS, and fuzzy sets. Furthermore, it has the capability to handle both quantitative and qualitative data (Shao et al., 2020). Moreover, AHP allows for various sensitivity analyses regarding criteria, taking into account the consistency or inconsistency of alternatives, which is the key advantage offered by this methodology (Moradi et al., 2020; Shaaban et al., 2018). In addition, when it comes to determining optimal locations for project allocation, AHP has been deemed sufficient as the results obtained do not significantly differ from those generated by more complex techniques such as FAHP, as stated by Mosadeghi et al. (2015).

There is a significant body of literature devoted to exploring opportunities for utilizing RESs in Tunisia, as evidenced by previous studies (Attig-Bahar et al., 2021; Balghouthi et al., 2016; Harrabi et al., 2023; Rekik and El Alimi, 2023; Trabelsi et al., 2016). However, there is currently a gap in research investigating the implementation of hybrid CSP–PV–wind turbine-based power generation systems, specifically in the Tataouine region, southernmost Tunisia. To address this gap, our study employs a GIS-based AHP integrated model. By systematically evaluating land suitability and providing clear findings on optimal locations for installing these systems, this article contributes to sustainable energy planning in southern Tunisia. It highlights the significance of hybrid renewable energy projects as a viable solution for meeting increasing electricity demand driven by population growth, urbanization, and industrial development. Such a comprehensive approach allows policymakers to consider multiple criteria when assessing the promising locations, ensuring that the identified sites are appropriate for hybrid energy production and adhere to principles of sustainability and social acceptance. Consequently, this study is distinctive as it provides an inclusive assessment encompassing both resources within the designated region's potential deployment analysis.

Methodology and data

The main objective of employing a MCDM analysis is to explore and evaluate various alternative options, leading to the identification of optimal solutions (Ilbahar et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2020). This approach aids in determining the best alternative that satisfies multiple conflicting criteria to the highest degree possible, while effectively managing large volumes of data and information based on expert insights (Al Garni et al., 2016; Elkadeem et al., 2021). In recent years, the application of MCDM has become increasingly prevalent in assessing the potential for resource exploitation and selecting suitable sites for renewable energy systems (Effat and El-Zeiny, 2022; Elboshy et al., 2022; Elkadeem et al., 2022). Considering the intricate nature of mapping multifaceted energy infrastructures, the integration of GIS with MCDM techniques has proven a very useful tool in facilitating informed judgments regarding the identification of potential sites for renewable energy projects (Al Garni and Awasthi, 2017; Badi et al., 2021; Elkadeem et al., 2021). However, according to Malczewski (2006), relying solely on geo-information systems may lead to imprecise results. To overcome this limitation and ensure comprehensive assessment, MCDM models have been utilized to prioritize alternative decisions while considering all the involved factors (Badi et al., 2021). As such, integrating GIS with MCDM tools has emerged as a valuable technique for enhancing the decision-making processes associated with the selection of sites for renewable energy solutions such as solar and wind power installations (Al Garni and Awasthi, 2017; Elkadeem et al., 2021 , 2022). The objective of this study is to conduct an initial evaluation in order to identify suitable locations in the Tataouine region that possess the potential for accommodating large-scale solar and wind installations as well as CSP–PV–wind hybrid systems.

To accomplish this objective, a GIS-based analytical hierarchy process approach was applied. In addition, advanced satellite imagery, in conjunction with additional geospatial data, was employed to evaluate the geographical attributes and ground conditions of prospective areas in Tataouine. The utilization of satellite data greatly enhanced the precision of environmental mapping and enabled a thorough assessment of diverse factors including land feasibility, climatic patterns, and ease of access. Moreover, through an extensive examination of relevant scholarly literature and consultation with a panel of well-informed experts, an inclusive set of eleven decision criteria has been identified. These criteria have been further grouped into four categories: climatology, topography, environmental, and accessibility. The considered factors encompass global solar irradiance (GHI), DNI, average temperatures; wind speeds; slope; land aspect, land use; water resources, proximity to residential areas as well as grid and transport infrastructure accessibility. Figure 1 illustrates the methodology employed in determining optimal locations for solar and wind power plants as well as hybrid systems.

Figure 1.

Key steps in determining optimal locations for PV–wind, PV–CSP, and CSP–wind systems.

Study area

Tataouine is the largest governorate of Tunisia, covering an area of 38,889 km² making 24% of the country (Figure 2) and it is home to approximately 152,000 residents. This region is situated between 31.98˚ North latitude and 9.96˚ East longitude in southernmost Tunisia. Tataouine is a landlocked region bordered by Algeria to the west, Libya to the east, and Kebili and Mednine to the north (Figure 2). The region is characterized by arid climatic conditions featuring long hot summers and short mild winters. Traditionally reliant on agriculture for economic sustenance, Tataouine has recently witnessed significant growth in Saharan tourism as well. However, longstanding challenges persist within the region including high unemployment rates, marginalization issues, and disparities in development initiatives compared to the more privileged coastal and northern regions.

Figure 2.

Study area.

Analytic Hierarchy Process

As deduced from the literature, AHP has been by far the most widely utilized MCDM approach in numerous applications, including renewable energy applications. First introduced by Saaty, this technique serves as a mathematical approach that can be employed as a decision analysis tool (Saaty and Vargas, 2012). It facilitates the ranking of various alternatives based on multiple factors while considering conflicting objectives, which provides an optimal compromise (Sindhu et al., 2017). A key benefit of employing the AHP is its adaptability in managing complex issues by breaking them down into more manageable components. Additionally, it accommodates both quantitative and qualitative data while ensuring consistency through validation procedures (Al Garni et al., 2016; Ouchani et al., 2020). Therefore, considering these advantages, the AHP approach has been selected for this article. The AHP's key steps are summarized as follows (Al Garni et al., 2016; Sindhu et al., 2017):

1. Construct the initial pairwise comparison matrices. The element x_ij of matrix K_n × n, denotes the importance of the ith criterion over the jth one, based on Saaty's scale (Saaty and Vargas, 2012), as shown in Table 2.

K = [\begin{matrix} x_{11} & x_{12} & \dots & x_{1 n} \\ x_{21} & x_{22} & \dots & x_{2 n} \\ ⋮ & ⋮ & ⋱ & ⋮ \\ x_{n 1} & x_{m 2} & \dots & x_{n n} \end{matrix}]

(1)

Where

i = 1, 2, \dots n a n d j = 1, 2, \dots n

2. Normalize the initial matrix K

3. Calculate the Eigenvector, maximum Eigen value, and consistency index (CI)

C I = \frac{λ_{max - n}}{n - 1}

(2)

where

λ_{m a x}

is the maximum eigenvalue for each matrix and n the number of criteria.

4. Compute the consistency ratio (CR) to check the consistency of judgements provided by experts

C R = \frac{C I}{R I}

(3)

where RI is the random index (Table 3).

Table 3.

Random index for different values of number of elements.

n	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
RI	0	0.58	0.90	1.12	1.24	1.32	1.41	1.45	1.49	1.51	1.48

If $C R \leq 0.10$ , the degree of consistency is acceptable; otherwise, serious inconsistencies exist in the pairwise comparison and therefore, the procedure has to be repeated.

Decision criteria and constraints and decision criteria

Allocating optimal sites for renewable energy projects is always associated with various overlapping factors as well as constraints. Thus, the assessment of such factors should go beyond economic and technological standpoint, yet, socio-political and environmental aspects have to be incorporated as well. To ensure the accuracy of this evaluation, it is crucial to involve knowledgeable experts in employing MCDM approaches. Assigning relative scores to the considered factors plays a vital role in determining their significance compared to each other. As part of this article, five experts with over 15 years of experience in the renewable energy sector in Tunisia, were requested to conduct the pairwise comparisons and suggest the most influential factors considering the Tunisian energy context. For more details regarding these experts’ backgrounds please refer to Table A.1.

Constraints

The selection of suitable locations for deploying renewable energy technologies requires careful consideration of various limitations of economic, technical, and environmental types. In this study, restrictive factors were identified based on an extensive literature review, as outlined in Table. These restrictive limitations were aggregated into a single layer using Boolean algebra (1 and 0) within ArcGIS 10.8 (Figure 3). A value of “1” indicates that there are no restrictions present in those areas, making them suited for the development of solar and wind farms; while a value of “0” signifies the presence of limitations that render such developments unfeasible.

Figure 3.

Constraints map.

Decision criteria

Climate

The selection of an appropriate location for solar PV–CSP or wind power plants depends heavily on climate factors such as solar irradiance, wind speeds, and temperatures. These parameters are crucial in determining the estimated power production capacity (Baseer et al., 2017; Effat and El-Zeiny, 2022; Ghasemi et al., 2019; Mutume, 2023). Therefore, it is essential to ensure that the selected location receives sufficient sunlight throughout the year. Previous research has shown that minimum annual GHI and DNI thresholds of 1477 kWh/m² for and 1800kWh/m² are necessary for achieving economic viability in typical PV and CSP systems (Aly et al., 2017; Spyridonidou and Vagiona, 2023). Likewise, when evaluating potential sites for constructing wind farms, average wind speeds play a pivotal role in the selection process. It is worth noting that PV modules’ efficiency relies on both isolation intensity and ambient temperature; higher temperatures have an adverse impact on system performance by causing energy losses of approximately 0.4%–0.5% per degree Celsius increase above 25°C (Günen, 2021). These criteria (Figure 4(a)–(d)) representing solar radiation, ambient temperatures, and wind speeds were derived from the SOLARGIS portal (www.solargis.com), the Global Wind Atlas (www.globalwindatlas.info/area/Tunisia), and the national institute of meteorology (www.meteo.tn/fr/donnees-climatiques).

Topography

Figure 4.

Decision criteria thematic maps: (a) DNI. (b) GHI. (c) Wind speed. (d) Ambient temperature. (e) Slope. (f) Aspect. (g) Accessibility criteria. (h) Land use. (i) Water Resources.

To ensure the economic viability of solar and wind facilities, careful consideration must be given to the topographic features of their location. It is imperative to establish these facilities on flat terrain or in areas with gentle slopes, as steeper inclinations can lead to increased construction and maintenance costs. Moreover, steep slopes may create shadows that adversely affect the performance of photovoltaic systems. Therefore, areas with lower slopes are highly favorable (Ali et al., 2019; Ghasemi et al., 2019; Günen, 2021). Typically, acceptable slope thresholds range between 3% and 5% for solar systems, whereas wind facilities may tolerate 10%–30% ranges (Effat and El-Zeiny, 2022). Moreover southeast to southwest-facing slopes are widely regarded as ideal within the Northern Hemisphere due to maximum sunlight exposure (Al Garni and Awasthi, 2017; Effat and El-Zeiny, 2022; Koc et al., 2019). A 30 m Digital Elevation Model (https://blog.arabnubia.com/2020/05/tunisia-nasadem-digital-elevation-model-1-arc-second) was used to process these criteria, as depicted in Figure 4(e)–(f).

Accessibility

Placing solar and wind systems near the grid network is crucial for ensuring their long-term viability. Power losses and distribution costs are closely tied to the distance from end-users, making it essential to minimize line spacing between the grid and these systems. Additionally, transportation infrastructure also plays a crucial role in the site selection process, as it significantly affects the overall project costs (Albraheem and AlAwlaqi, 2023; Elkadeem et al., 2021). Easy access at a potential site not only reduces construction-related costs during the building and operational phases but also contributes to enhanced efficiency (Günen, 2021; Tercan et al., 2020). Therefore, selecting sites with favorable accessibility becomes imperative. These accessibility criteria (Figure 4(i)) were obtained from the open street map project 2022 (http://download.geofabrik.de/africa/tunisia.html).

Environment

From an environmental perspective, renewable energy facilities have to be placed within areas that are free from limitations associated with land use, which significantly hinders the deployment of such facilities like sand dunes, forests, mountains, water bodies, archeological sites, military zones, etc. In the literature, typical types of land use that are considered best suited for installing renewable energy projects include bare grounds and rangelands with sparse vegetation (Al Garni and Awasthi, 2017). Moreover, the construction and operation of certain renewable technologies, such as CSP plants, require substantial amounts of water (Aly et al., 2017; Mutume, 2023; Yushchenko et al., 2018). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate water resources in CSP plants to ensure efficient operation since cooling systems and steam generation rely heavily on water. The criterion of land use (Figure 4(h)) was derived from a high-resolution map provided by ESA (https://esa-worldcover.org/en), while the water resources (Figure 4(i)) were obtained from OSM project 2022.

Results and discussion

After eliminating these constraints, a spatial suitability analysis was conducted to identify optimal locations for deploying PV–wind, PV–CSP, and CSP–wind hybrid systems in the Tataouine region. To conduct this analysis, the study utilized Spatial Analyst tools within the ArcGis 10.8., which are widely recognized as effective solutions for addressing complex site selection challenges. Data from various layers were standardized onto a common scale and then reclassified accordingly (see Table A.2 in Appendix A). Each reclassified input layer was weighted based on its relative importance derived from the AHP technique. Ultimately, the raster calculator tool was used to extract final maps displaying suitability levels for each system. The integration of satellite data enabled a thorough evaluation of the climatic and topographical factors in the potential areas studied. This combined approach significantly enhanced the precision of the MCDM method, providing a more accurate representation of ground conditions. Additionally, remote sensing data revealed that our chosen sites exhibited high levels of solar irradiance and consistent wind speeds, indicating their substantial potential for solar and wind energy generation.

Pairwise comparisons

The AHP model developed in this study highlighted the influential role of resource and topography criteria, specifically wind speed, GHI, DNI, and slope, as outlined in Table 4. Climate criteria emerged as major determining factors for wind, solar CSP, and solar PV, with scores of 43.2%, 34.4%, and 34.26%, respectively. As expected, a higher availability of resources directly contributes to increased electricity generation potential. Slope ranked next in terms of influencing site selection decisions for the three technologies, securing second position on the importance scale. Therefore, it is crucial to locate these facilities on flat or gently sloping terrain while minimizing proximity to transport links or power grids in order to prevent additional expenses. Which is why the grid and transport infrastructure were assigned higher weights for all the technologies. Nevertheless, it has been deduced from the extensive literature that solar PV systems are highly sensitive to temperature and aspect factors due to their direct impact on power output while the availability of water resources assures the CSP systems’ maximum performance. As for PV technology, these factors had similar weights of nearly 8.5%, while the criterion of water resources obtained a respective score of 16.7%. Lastly, based on the experts’ feedback, land use and proximity to residential areas were perceived as the least influential factors.

Table 4.

AHP weights assigned to decision criteria for evaluation of CSP–PV–wind installation.

Factor	criteria	Relative weight
Factor	criteria	Onshore wind	Solar CSP	Solar PV
climate	GHI	-	-	34.26%
	DNI	-	34.4%	-
	Wind speed	43.2%	-	-
	Temperature	-	-	8.49%
Topography	Slope	22.3%	18.4%	14.45%
Topography	Aspect	-	-	8.29%
Accessibility	Distance to transport links	9.9%	7.4%	11.69%
	Distance to grid network	13.9%	11.9%	13.39%
	Distance to urban areas	4.6%	4.8%	3.07%
Environment	Land use	6.1%	6.4%	6.37%
Environment	Water resources	-	16.7%	-
	RI	1.24	1.32	1.41
	λ_max	6.449	7.582	8.733
	CI	0.089	0.097	0.105
	CR	7.24%	7.35%	7.42%

Spatial distribution

Single technologies

The perusal of the wind suitability map (Figure 5(a)) indicates that 3.44% of the total surface area, approximately 1129 km², is highly suitable for wind energy generation. Areas falling under the “suitable,” “moderately suitable,” “least suitable,” and “least suitable” classes represented 25.65%, 34.11%, 20.91%, and 15.89%, respectively (Figure 6). Furthermore, the spatial analysis revealed that the most favorable locations for wind were densely scattered, mainly in the northernmost to the northeast and central to the southern east parts of the region. It was observed that Remada and Dhiba were by far the most promising locations for hosting wind facilities, accounting for nearly 83% of those sites.

Figure 5.

Final suitability maps. (a) Wind suitability map. (b) Solar PV suitability map. (c) Solar CSP suitability map.

Figure 6.

Land distribution for single technologies.

As for CSP technology (Figure 5(b)), the land suitability analysis revealed that nearly 1740 km², representing 4.48% of the total available area, were most suitable for installing CSP power plants in Tataouine. In addition, it was observed that the geographical distribution of the highly desirable sites followed the same pattern as that of wind, where Remada and Dhiba comprised more than 95% of optimal locations.

In contrast, the spatial analysis showed that the well-suited locations for solar PV technology were almost threefold and twofold those of wind and CSP, respectively. They represented 8.5% of the total surface area and covered an area of 3435 km². Such locations were concentrated from the southern east to the southernmost parts of Tataouine (Figure 5(c)).

Hybrid systems

The integrated approach facilitated the identification of potential locations that have the capacity to support different hybrid combinations of PV–wind (Figure 7), CSP–PV (Figure 8), and CSP–wind (Figure 9). By evaluating the geographical alignment of suitable sites, it was possible to determine 792.698 km² of land that is highly favorable for PV–CSP hybrid systems. Conversely, potential sites for installing CSP–wind and PV–wind systems were way less than those of the first combination, covering areas of 411 km² and 333 km², respectively. Among such locations, Remada and Dhiba appeared to be exceptionally well-suited for such hybrid energy systems. This outcome signifies the importance of utilizing these hybrid systems in this region. Owing to their complementary nature, it is possible to ensure a balanced power generation profile and maximize resource utilization. In addition, the shared infrastructure and innovative storage solutions would further improve the reliability and grid integration of these hybrid facilities.

Figure 7.

Potential PV–wind hybrid sites.

Figure 8.

Potential CSP–PV hybrid sites.

Figure 9.

Potential CSP–wind hybrid sites.

Estimated energy

Theoretically, wind and solar power generation can be characterized as the assessment of wind and solar resources within an optimal and well-suited area for implementing wind, solar PV, or CSP power plants based on the technical specifications of commercially available technologies. It is to be noted that only highly suitable sites were considered in this analysis.

To compute the technical solar annual power (AEP), several characteristics of the PV and CSP systems have to be considered, such as the solar radiation potential, efficiency, system performance, and capacity factor (Anwarzai and Nagasaka, 2017; Ghasemi et al., 2019; Mutume, 2023), as outlined in Table 5. Hence, the annual output power (AEP) could be calculated as follows:

Table 5.

Technologies used to compute the solar technical potential.

Technology	Technology type	Efficiency (%)	Performance ratio (%)
PV	Mono crystalline silicon	15–22	70–85
CSP	Parabolic trough steam cycle	15–21	NA

AEP = GHI or DNI * Efficiency * Available Area * Area Factor

(4)

Where area factor (%) denotes the fraction of the total available area that can be covered by solar panels.

Wind farms at a utilityscale benefit from the use of large turbines, which are capable of generating more energy even at lower wind speeds. The output power, operation, and installation costs are directly related to the appropriate placement of these turbines (Hartman, 2023). In most wind facilities, the spacing between turbines is approximately three to fifteen times the diameter of the turbine's rotor (Meyers and Meneveau, 2011; Stevens et al., 2016). Due to the lack of wind direction data, a 10D spacing factor was used as an equal spacing factor. In order to assess the installed capacity potential, our analysis assumed 4 MW/km², considering a sample of commercial wind turbines (3.518–4.8 MW) currently available on the market, as shown in Table 6. Then, the annual wind energy yield (AEP) was computed as follows:

A E P (G W h) = \sum (ICP * 8760 * Capacity Factor)

(5)

Table 6.

Sample of the large wind turbines available in the market (Anwarzai and Nagasaka, 2017).

Turbine		Hub height (m)	Rotor diameter (m)	Name plate capacity (MW)	Area per turbine (Km²)	installed capacity (MW/km²)
Vestas	III	84–119	112	3.8	0.794	4.157
Vestas	III	80–105	90	1.8	0.405	4.444
Eno	III	92–142	126	3.5	0.794	4.409
Siemens	IIB	80	108	2.3	0.583	3.944
Gamesa	III	109	97	2.0	0.470	4.251
Mitsubishi	II	80	100	2.4	0.500	4.800
Nordex	III	164	116.8	2.4	0.682	3.518

From the existing literature, it has been widely accepted that wind capacity factors range from 20% to 30%. In a study by Maatallah et al. (2012), which explored wind energy at various heights in Tunisia, it was found that the capacity factor of eight different turbines ranged from 24% to 45%. As such, a capacity of 35% was applied for this study.

When estimating the energy yield from a hybrid energy system, a power distribution ratio is often considered (Desai et al., 2019). This ratio depends on various factors such as the project's objectives, available resources, and system design considerations. In this study, an equal power distribution (50%–50%) was used, with each technology accounting for 50% of the total installed capacity.

The technical potential of hybrid systems energy generation greatly depends on factors such as selected wind turbine or solar technology type and system efficiency which have a significant impact on actual potential when compared to theoretical values. In this case study, according to numerical computations, the annual energy production was estimated at 316.169, 91.252, and 62.970 TWh for CSP–PV, CSP–wind, and PV–wind, respectively (Figure 10). These figures are equivalent to 14-fold, fourfold, and threefold the entire energy demand as of 2022 (STEG, 2022). This indicates that the Tataouine region enjoys significant renewable potential. Interestingly, CSP–PV hybrid systems exhibited higher levels compared to other combinations. Comprising nearly 100% of the well-suited areas considered, Remada and Dhiba stood out as particularly favorable locations for installing these hybrid systems. This is mainly due to the exceptional climatic conditions, gentle slope, and proper type of land use dominant in those regions.

Figure 10.

Estimated energy yield of different technologies at potential hybrid sites.

Discussion

The study's outcome offers significant potential for the adaptation of hybrid renewable energy facilities within the Tataouine region. The installation of CSP–PV, PV–wind, and CSP–wind hybrid systems proves to operate at optimum performance within the geographical and climate conditions observed.

The use of the AHP as an MCDM tool has significantly shaped the results of our current research. This methodology has allowed us to handle both quantitative and qualitative data effectively, confirming its versatility and broad applicability (Kumar et al., 2017; Messaoudi et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2020). Nonetheless, the efficacy of this method has been questioned as inconsistencies appeared in the experts’ judgments on the importance of criteria (Díaz-Cuevas et al., 2021; Mosase et al., 2017). This led to results that were not as solid or accurate as those from other methods like FAHP, FTOPSIS, and DEMATEL (Khashei-Siuki and Sharifan, 2020; Shojaeimehr and Rahmani, 2022).

In addition, the results obtained also correspond to similar research conducted in countries with comparable geographic and climate characteristics. For instance, Díaz-Cuevas et al. (2021) and Gouareh et al. (2021), using the same approach, found similar key criteria for the successful adaptation of PV–wind hybrid and CSP technologies in Algeria. Furthermore, in comparison with similar works conducted in Egypt, Morocco, and Kenya (Effat and El-Zeiny, 2022; Elkadeem et al., 2021; Jbaihi et al., 2022), our outcome was found to be significant and provide very competitive opportunities for Tataouine and the entire country as a whole. This validates our findings and emphasizes that hybrid power systems, including CSP–PV, PV–wind, and CSP–wind, could be a solution for regions sharing similar attributes. The potential contribution of hybrid renewable energy systems is enormous. However, this study did not consider several critical constraints related to political, socio-cultural, and comprehensive environmental impact assessment. Despite setting an ambitious goal to generate 30% of electricity from renewables by 2030 to achieve energy independence, diversify the energy mix, and reduce energy imports and emissions intensity, hardly any progress has been made thus far. Challenges including social and political obstacles, a lack of funding resources, and an unfavorable investment climate have all impeded the implementation of this plan. Considering the multitude of socio-economic challenges faced by Tataouine, it is crucial to implement tangible measures that foster investment in these hybrid systems (Khammassi et al., 2021; Rouine and Roche, 2022). To identify optimal locations for such projects, not only must suitable areas be identified but also improvements need to be made to grid infrastructure, transportation systems, manufacturing facilities, as well as educational and training centers (Saraswat et al., 2021). Therefore, developing such hybrid systems can spur economic growth. Moreover, these systems provide a more reliable power supply while mitigating reliance on conventional fuels and carbon footprint (Abbasi et al., 2020; Bashir et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022).

Conclusion

In light of the growing importance placed on environmentally sustainable and economically feasible electricity generation, hybrid renewable energy systems, such as solar PV–wind, PV–CSP, and CSP–wind, have emerged as viable alternatives. With this sector experiencing rapid expansion, it is crucial to identify optimal energy production locations. Thus, this study focused on determining the appropriate locations for PV–CSP, PV–wind, and CSP–wind hybrid systems in Tataouine, southern Tunisia. For this reason, an integrated GIS-based AHP model was developed. This model considered several key criteria, such as GHI, DNI, wind speed, water resources, land use, proximity to grid and transport infrastructure, as well as residential areas. The results showed that the Tataouine region is an ideal location for deploying these hybrid technologies due to its exceptional climate and geographical conditions. The region exhibited high levels of solar irradiation along with consistent wind patterns, favorable topography, and adequate infrastructure. It has been demonstrated that Tataouine showcases significant potential for accommodating PV–CSP, CSP–wind, and PV–wind configurations, with extensive well-suited areas of approximately 793 km², 413 km², and 333 km², respectively. In terms of projected electricity generation, it was anticipated that these integrated systems would yield an annual output power of 316.169 TWh for PV-CSP, 91.252 TWh for CSP-wind, and 62.970 TWh for PV–wind. By embracing such sustainable and innovative solutions, it would be possible to maximize energy production, enhance reliability, and provide a more balanced and consistent power supply. This work serves as a significant example for other regions and countries seeking to capitalize on their renewable energy potential through evidence-based site selection methodologies. However, to enhance the precision of the decision-making process, future research should entail the architecture and modeling of the CSP–PV–wind hybrid systems so that they satisfy maximum output power while minimizing costs.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Souheil El Alimi

Appendix A

Table A.2.

Solar PV, Solar CSP, and onshore wind site selection decision criteria.

Main factor	Decision criteria	Attribute values	Suitability rate
Climate	GHI (kWh/m²/year)	< 1477	1
		1478–1799	2
		1800–1899	3
		1900–1999	4
		> 2000	5
	DNI (kWh/m²/year)	< 1799	1
		1800–1899	2
		1900–1999	3
		2000–2099	4
		> 2100	5
	Wind speed (m/s)	< 4.99	1
		5–5.99	2
		6–6.99	3
		7–7.99	4
		> 8	5
	Temperature (C˚)	> 23	1
		22–22.99	2
		21–21.99	3
		20–20.99	4
		< 19.99	5
Topography	Slope (degree)	> 10	1
		8–10	2
		5–8	3
		2–5	4
		< 2	5
	Aspect	Flat	1
		N, NE, NW	2
		E, W	3
		SE, SW	4
		S	5
Accessibility	proximity to major Roads (km)	> 15	1
		10–15	2
		5–10	3
		1–5	4
		0.5–1	5
	Proximity to power lines (km)	> 15	1
		10–15	2
		5–10	3
		1–5	4
		0.3–1	5
	Proximity to residential areas (km)	20–25	1
		15–20	2
		10–15	3
		5–10	4
		2- 5	5
Environment	Land use	Built-up, water bodies, forests, etc.	1
		Cropland	2
		Shrubland	3
		Sparse vegetation	4
		Bare lands	5
	Proximity to water resources (km)	> 15	1
		10–15	2
		5–10	3
		1–5	4
		0.5–1	5

References

Abbasi

Jiao

Shahbaz

, et al. (2020) Asymmetric impact of renewable and non-renewable energy on economic growth in Pakistan: New evidence from a nonlinear analysis. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 38(5): 1946–1967.

Abdelrazik

Abdelaziz

Hassan

, et al. (2022) Climate action: Prospects of solar energy in Africa. Energy Reports 8: 11363–11377.

Alami Merrouni

Elwali Elalaoui

Mezrhab

, et al. (2018) Large scale PV sites selection by combining GIS and Analytical Hierarchy Process. Case study: Eastern Morocco. Renewable Energy 119: 863–873.

Albraheem

AlAwlaqi

(2023) Geospatial analysis of wind energy plant in Saudi Arabia using a GIS-AHP technique. Energy Reports 9: 5878–5898.

Al Garni

Kassem

Awasthi

, et al. (2016) A multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 16: 137–150.

Al Garni

Awasthi

(2017) Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy 206: 1225–1240.

Ali

Taweekun

Techato

, et al. (2019) GIS Based site suitability assessment for wind and solar farms in Songkhla, Thailand. Renewable Energy 132: 1360–1372.

Aly

Jensen

Pedersen

(2017) Solar power potential of Tanzania: Identifying CSP and PV hot spots through a GIS multicriteria decision making analysis. Renewable Energy 113: 159–175.

Anwarzai

Nagasaka

(2017) Utility-scale implementable potential of wind and solar energies for Afghanistan using GIS multi-criteria decision analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 71: 150–160.

10.

Asadi

Pourhossein

Noorollahi

, et al. (2023) A new decision framework for hybrid solar and wind power plant site selection using linear regression modeling based on GIS-AHP. Sustainability 15(10): 8359.

11.

Attig-Bahar

Ritschel

Akari

, et al. (2021) Wind energy deployment in Tunisia: Status, drivers, barriers and research gaps—A comprehensive review. Energy Reports 7: 7374–7389.

12.

Badi

Pamucar

Gigović

, et al. (2021) Optimal site selection for sitting a solar park using a novel GIS- SWA’TEL model: A case study in Libya. International Journal of Green Energy 18(4): 336–350.

13.

Balghouthi

Trabelsi

Amara

, et al. (2016) Potential of concentrating solar power (CSP) technology in Tunisia and the possibility of interconnection with Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56: 1227–1248.

14.

Baseer

Rehman

Meyer

, et al. (2017) GIS-based site suitability analysis for wind farm development in Saudi Arabia. Energy 141: 1166–1176.

15.

Bashir

Kanwal

Zeb

, et al. (2022) Integrated energy planning and modeling (IEPM) for sustainable electricity generation in Pakistan: Challenges and limitations. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 40(6): 1806–1836.

16.

Capellán-Pérez

Mediavilla

de Castro

, et al. (2014) Fossil fuel depletion and socio-economic scenarios: An integrated approach. Energy 77: 641–666.

17.

Day

(2017) Climate change, fossil fuel prices and depletion: The rationale for a falling export tax. Economic Modelling 63: 153–160.

18.

Desai

Ray

Mukhopadhyay

(2019) Theoretical analysis of a solar PV-wind hybrid power system for energy generation in Kutch region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 322: 012006.

19.

Díaz-Cuevas

Haddad

Fernandez-Nunez

(2021) Energy for the future: Planning and mapping renewable energy. The case of Algeria. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 47: 101445.

20.

Diemuodeke

Addo

Oko

COC

, et al. (2019) Optimal mapping of hybrid renewable energy systems for locations using multi-criteria decision-making algorithm. Renewable Energy 134: 461–477.

21.

Döring

Far

Marrouki

, et al. (2018) Energy for the future—evaluating different electricity-generation technologies against selected performance characteristics and stakeholder preferences: Insights from the case study Tunisia. Policy Paper. bicc\Internationales Konverszentrium Bonn, Bonn.

22.

Effat

El-Zeiny

(2022) Geospatial modeling for selection of optimum sites for hybrid solar-wind energy in Assiut Governorate, Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 25(2): 627–637.

23.

Elboshy

Alwetaishi

Aly

, et al. (2022) A suitability mapping for the PV solar farms in Egypt based on GIS-AHP to optimize multi-criteria feasibility. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 13(3): 101618.

24.

Elkadeem

Younes

Mazzeo

, et al. (2022) Geospatial-assisted multi-criterion analysis of solar and wind power geographical-technical-economic potential assessment. Applied Energy 322: 119532.

25.

Elkadeem

Younes

Sharshir

, et al. (2021) Sustainable siting and design optimization of hybrid renewable energy system: A geospatial multi-criteria analysis. Applied Energy 295: 117071.

26.

Ersoy

Terrapon-Pfaf

(2021) Sustainable transformation of Tunisia's energy system. Climate change, energy and environment. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

27.

Esposito

Romagnoli

(2023) Overview of policy and market dynamics for the deployment of renewable energy sources in Italy: Current status and future prospects. Heliyon 9: e17406.

28.

Gardumi

Mhiri

Howells

, et al. (2021) A scenario analysis of potential long-term impacts of COVID-19 on the Tunisian electricity sector. Energy Strategy Reviews 38: 100759.

29.

Ghasemi

Noorollahi

Alavi

, et al. (2019) Theoretical and technical potential evaluation of solar power generation in Iran. Renewable Energy 138: 1250–1261.

30.

Gouareh

Settou

(2021) A new geographical information system approach based on best worst method and analytic hierarchy process for site suitability and technical potential evaluation for large-scale CSP on-grid plant: An application for Algeria territory. Energy Conversion and Management 235: 113963.

31.

Gudlaugsson

Ahmed

Dawood

, et al. (2023) Cost and environmental benefit analysis: An assessment of renewable energy integration and smart solution technologies in the InteGRIDy project. Cleaner Energy Systems 5: 100071.

32.

Günen

(2021) A comprehensive framework based on GIS-AHP for the installation of solar PV farms in Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. Renewable Energy 178: 212–225.

33.

Güney

(2021) Renewable energy and sustainable development: Evidence from OECD countries. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 40(4): e13609.

34.

Haddad

Díaz-Cuevas

Ferreira

, et al. (2021) Mapping concentrated solar power site suitability in Algeria. Renewable Energy 168: 838–853.

35.

Harrabi

Hamdi

Hazami

(2023) Potential of simple and hybrid nanofluid enhancement in performances of a flat plate solar water heater under a typical north-African climate (Tunisia). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(12): 35366–35383.

36.

Harrucksteiner

Thakur

Franke

, et al. (2023) A geospatial assessment of the techno-economic wind and solar potential of Mongolia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 55: 102889.

37.

Hartman

(2023) Wind Turbines: the Bigger, the Better. Energy.Gov. https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/wind-turbines-bigger-better#:∼:text=Larger%20rotor%20diameters%20allow%20wind,areas%20with%20relatively%20less%20wind.

38.

Höök

Tang

(2013) Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change—A review. Energy Policy 52: 797–809.

39.

Idris

AMS

Dhewanto

Anggoro

(2022) State-of-the-art: Multi criteria decision making variables on solar PV business potential. Energy Reports 8: 613–624.

40.

Ilbahar

Cebi

Kahraman

(2019) A state-of-the-art review on multi-attribute renewable energy decision making. Energy Strategy Reviews 25: 18–33.

41.

International Renewable Energy Agency – IRENA (2021) Renewable Readiness Assessment: The Republic of Tunisia. Available at: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2021/Jun/IRENA_RRA_Tunisia-2021.pdf.

42.

Jbaihi

Ouchani

Alami Merrouni

, et al. (2022) An AHP-GIS based site suitability analysis for integrating large-scale hybrid CSP + PV plants in Morocco: An approach to address the intermittency of solar energy. Journal of Cleaner Production 369: 133250.

43.

, et al. (2017) A review on the development of photovoltaic/concentrated solar power (PV-CSP) hybrid systems. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 161: 305–327.

44.

Khammassi

Rehimi

Kalboussi

(2021) Development of an Energy Sustainability Index of Mobility for Tunisian Cities. In 2021 9th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC) (pp.1–5). IEEE.

45.

Khanjarpanah

Jabbarzadeh

Seyedhosseini

(2018) A novel multi-period double frontier network DEA to sustainable location optimization of hybrid wind-photovoltaic power plant with real application. Energy Conversion and Management 159: 175–188.

46.

Khashei-Siuki

Sharifan

(2020) Comparison of AHP and FAHP methods in determining suitable areas for drinking water harvesting in Birjand aquifer. Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 10: 100328.

47.

Koc

Turk

Şahin

(2019) Multi-criteria of wind-solar site selection problem using a GIS-AHP-based approach with an application in Igdir province/Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(31): 32298–32310.

48.

Kuleli Pak

Albayrak

Erensal

(2017) Evaluation of sources for the sustainability of energy supply in Turkey. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 36(2): 627–637.

49.

Kumar

Sah

Singh

, et al. (2017) A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 69: 596–609.

50.

Kung

Zhang

Gong

, et al. (2019) A sector-wide economic and environmental analysis on bioenergy production and emission consequences. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 37(4): 1408–1425.

51.

Liu

Ding

, et al. (2022) Research on optimization of energy storage regulation model considering wind–solar and multi-energy complementary intermittent energy interconnection. Energy Reports 8: 490–501.

52.

Maatallah

El Ouderni

El Alimi

, et al. (2012) Experimental study of solar flux energy basing on measured sun covering-rate in the gulf of Tunis, Tunisia. Sustainable Cities and Society 5: 63–69.

53.

Majeed

Khan

Waseem

, et al. (2023) Renewable energy as an alternative source for energy management in agriculture. Energy Reports 10: 344–359.

54.

Majumdar

Pasqualetti

(2019) Analysis of land availability for utility-scale power plants and assessment of solar photovoltaic development in the state of Arizona, USA. Renewable Energy 134: 1213–1231.

55.

Malczewski

(2006) GIS-Based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(7): 703–726.

56.

Manirambona

Talai

Kimutai

(2022) A review of sustainable planning of Burundian energy sector in east Africa. Energy Strategy Reviews 43: 100927.

57.

Messaoudi

Settou

Negrou

, et al. (2019) GIS Based multi-criteria decision making for solar hydrogen production sites selection in Algeria. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44(60): 31808–31831.

58.

Meyers

Meneveau

(2011) Optimal turbine spacing in fully developed wind farm boundary layers. Wind Energy 15(2): 305–317.

59.

Mishra

Saini

Chauhan

, et al. (2023) Optimal sizing and assessment of grid-tied hybrid renewable energy system for electrification of rural site. Renewable Energy Focus 44: 259–276.

60.

Monforti

Huld

Bódis

, et al. (2014) Assessing complementarity of wind and solar resources for energy production in Italy. A Monte Carlo approach. Renewable Energy 63: 576–586.

61.

Moradi

Yousefi

Noorollahi

, et al. (2020) Multi-criteria decision support system for wind farm site selection and sensitivity analysis: Case study of Alborz province, Iran. Energy Strategy Reviews 29: 100478.

62.

Mosadeghi

Warnken

Tomlinson

, et al. (2015) Comparison of fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 49: 54–65.

63.

Mosase

Kayombo

Tsheko

, et al. (2017) Assessment of the suitability of rain water harvesting areas using multi-criteria analysis and fuzzy logic. Advances in Research 10(4): 1–22.

64.

Muchiri

Kamau

Wekesa

, et al. (2023) Wind and solar resource complementarity and its viability in wind/PV hybrid energy systems in Machakos, Kenya. Scientific African 20: e01599.

65.

Mutume

(2023) A feasibility assessment of utilizing concentrated solar power (CSP) in the Zimbabwean regions of Hwange and Lupane. Heliyon 9: e18210.

66.

Ouchani

Jbaihi

Maaroufi

, et al. (2020) Identification of suitable sites for large-scale photovoltaic installations through a geographic information system and analytical hierarchy process combination: A case study in Marrakesh-Safi region, Morocco. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 29(7): 714–724.

67.

Rekik

El Alimi

(2023) Optimal wind-solar site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach: A case of Tunisia. Energy Conversion and Management: X 18: 100355.

68.

Rezaei-Shouroki

Mostafaeipour

Qolipour

(2017) Prioritizing of wind farm locations for hydrogen production: A case study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42(15): 9500–9510.

69.

Rouine

Roche

(2022) Renewable energy in Tunisia: An unjust transition. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES).

70.

Saaty

Vargas

(2012) The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process. In: Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2nd Edition New York: Springer, 23–40.

71.

Sabo

Mariun

Hizam

, et al. (2016) Spatial energy predictions from large-scale photovoltaic power plants located in optimal sites and connected to a smart grid in Peninsular Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 66: 79–94.

72.

Saidi

(2020) Impact of large photovoltaic power penetration on the voltage regulation and dynamic performance of the Tunisian power system. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 38(5): 1774–1809.

73.

Saraswat

Digalwar

Yadav

, et al. (2021) MCDM And GIS based modelling technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India. Renewable Energy 169: 865–884.

74.

Sghari

MBA

Hammami

(2016) Energy, pollution, and economic development in Tunisia. Energy Reports 2: 35–39.

75.

Shaaban

Scheffran

Böhner

, et al. (2018) Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies in Egypt using multi-criteria decision analysis. Energies 11(5): 1117.

76.

Shao

Han

Sun

, et al. (2020) A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection. Renewable Energy 157: 377–403.

77.

Shojaeimehr

Rahmani

(2022) Risk management of photovoltaic power plants using a novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on prospect theory: A sustainable development approach. Energy Conversion and Management: X 16: 100293.

78.

Sindhu

Nehra

Luthra

(2017) Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: Case study of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73: 496–511.

79.

Slusarewicz

Cohan

(2018) Assessing solar and wind complementarity in Texas. Renewables: Wind, Water, and Solar 5(1): 1–13.

80.

Solangi

Shah

SAA

Zameer

, et al. (2019) Assessing the solar PV power project site selection in Pakistan: Based on AHP-fuzzy VIKOR approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(29): 30286–30302.

81.

Sovacool

(2009) The intermittency of wind, solar, and renewable electricity generators: Technical barrier or rhetorical excuse? Utilities Policy 17(3–4): 288–296.

82.

Spiru

(2023) Assessment of renewable energy generated by a hybrid system based on wind, hydro, solar, and biomass sources for decarbonizing the energy sector and achieving a sustainable energy transition. Energy Reports 9: 167–174.

83.

Spyridonidou

Vagiona

(2023) A systematic review of site-selection procedures of PV and CSP technologies. Energy Reports 9: 2947–2979.

84.

STEG. Rapport annuel (2022) Available at: https://www.steg.com.tn/fr/institutionnel/publications.html.

85.

Stevens

Hobbs

Ramos

, et al. (2016) Combining economic and fluid dynamic models to determine the optimal spacing in very large wind farms. Wind Energy 20(3): 465–477.

86.

Suuronen

Lensu

Kuitunen

, et al. (2017) Optimization of photovoltaic solar power plant locations in northern Chile. Environmental Earth Sciences 76: 1–14.

87.

Sward

Nilson

Katkar

, et al. (2021) Integrating social considerations in multicriteria decision analysis for utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting. Applied Energy 288: 116543.

88.

Tercan

Saracoglu

Bilgilioğlu

, et al. (2020) Geographic information system-based investment system for photovoltaic power plants location analysis in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 192: 1–26.

89.

Trabelsi

Chargui

Qoaider

, et al. (2016) Techno-economic performance of concentrating solar power plants under the climatic conditions of the southern region of Tunisia. Energy Conversion and Management 119: 203–214.

90.

Waewsak

Ali

Natee

, et al. (2020) Assessment of hybrid, firm renewable energy-based power plants: Application in the southernmost region of Thailand. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 130: 109953.

91.

Wang

Dang

(2021) Location optimization of wind plants using DEA and fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: A case study in Vietnam. IEEE Access 9: 116265–116285.

92.

Wang

Dang

Bayer

(2021) A two-stage multiple criteria decision making for site selection of solar photovoltaic (PV) power plant: A case study in Taiwan. IEEE Access 9: 75509–75525.

93.

Wang

Dang

Nguyen

NAT

, et al. (2022) A combined data envelopment analysis (DEA) and grey based multiple criteria decision making (G-MCDM) for solar PV power plants site selection: A case study in Vietnam. Energy Reports 8: 1124–1142.

94.

Xiao

Yao

, et al. (2013) Research on an optimal site selection model for desert photovoltaic power plants based on analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 5(2): 023132.

95.

Zheng

, et al. (2020) Site selection of wind farms using GIS and multi-criteria decision making method in wafangdian, China. Energy 207: 118222.

96.

Yunna

Geng

(2014) Multi-criteria decision making on selection of solar–wind hybrid power station location: A case of China. Energy Conversion and Management 81: 527–533.

97.

Yushchenko

de Bono

Chatenoux

, et al. (2018) GIS-based assessment of photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP) generation potential in West Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81: 2088–2103.

98.

Zambrano-Asanza

Quiros-Tortos

Franco

(2021) Optimal site selection for photovoltaic power plants using a GIS-based multi-criteria decision making and spatial overlay with electric load. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 143: 110853.

99.

Zhou

Wang

Zhou

, et al. (2018) Roles of wind and solar energy in China’s power sector: Implications of intermittency constraints. Applied Energy 213: 22–30.

A spatial perspective on renewable energy optimization: Case study of southern Tunisia Using GIS and multicriteria decision making

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Literature review

Methodology and data

Study area

Analytic Hierarchy Process

Decision criteria and constraints and decision criteria

Constraints

Decision criteria

Results and discussion

Pairwise comparisons

Spatial distribution

Estimated energy

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Appendix A

References