In this article, the authors investigate how employer power is enacted and exercised in everyday processes at a time of non-conflict from the perspective of migrant workers. Relying on qualitative analysis of more than 120 migrants and professionals from the Danish construction sector, the authors demonstrate the various ways in which employers disrupt and deactivate worker power resources through gradual and consistent efforts to isolate migrant workers, create dependencies and wedges between them and hinder migrants’ opportunities to use their voice and gain knowledge, to the detriment of collectivism and unionism.
AhonenEQBenavidesFGBenachJ (2007) Immigrant populations, work and health: A systematic literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health33(2): 96–104.
2.
AlbertiGHolgateJTapiaM (2013) Organising migrants as workers or as migrant workers? Intersectionality, trade unions and precarious work. The International Journal of Human Resource Management24(22): 4132–4148.
ArnholtzJRefslundB (2019) Active enactment and virtuous circles of employment relations: How Danish unions organised the transnationalised Copenhagen Metro construction project. Work, Employment and Society33(4): 682–699.
5.
ArnholtzJRefslundB (2024a) Power resource theory for contemporary society: A research framework. In: ArnholtzJRefslundB (eds) Workers, Power and Society: Power Resource Theory in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
6.
ArnholtzJRefslundB (2024b) Power resource theory: Where are we at, where should we go, and what challenges lay ahead? In: ArnholtzJRefslundB (eds) Workers, Power and Society: Power Resource Theory in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
7.
BagnardiFSacchettoDVianelloFA (2024) Constructing mobilities: The reproduction of posted workers’ disposability in the construction sector. Work, Employment and Society38(6): 1703–1724.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
12.
CaroEBerntsenLLillieN, et al. (2015) Posted migration and segregation in the European construction sector. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(10): 1600–1620.
13.
CarstensenMBIbsenCLSchmidtVA (2022) Ideas and power in employment relations studies. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society61(1): 3–21.
14.
CreswellJW (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DoellgastVLillieNPulignanoV, et al. (2018) From dualization to solidarity: Halting the cycle of precarity. In: DoellgastVLillieNPulignanoV (eds) Reconstructing Solidarity: Labour Unions, Precarious Work, and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Esping-AndersenG (1985) Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Felbo-KoldingJLeschkeJSpreckelsenTF (2019) A division of labour? Labour market segmentation by region of origin: the case of intra-EU migrants in the UK, Germany and Denmark. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(15): 2820–2843.
22.
FribergJHHaakestadH (2015) Arbeidsmigrasjon, makt og styringsideologier: Norsk byggenæring i en brytningstid. Søkelys på arbeidslivet32(3): 182–205.
23.
FribergJHArnholtzJEldringL, et al. (2014) Nordic labour market institutions and new migrant workers: Polish migrants in Oslo, Copenhagen and Reykjavik. European Journal of Industrial Relations20(1): 37–53.
24.
GreerI (2024) The structural power of workers under capitalism: A marketisation approach. In: ArnholtzJRefslundB (eds) Workers, Power and Society: Power Resource Theory in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
25.
GrimshawDJohnsonM (2024) Leveraging power resources for a decent minimum wage. In: ArnholtzJRefslundB (eds) Workers, Power and Society: Power Resource Theory in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
26.
GrimshawDRuberyJAnxoD, et al. (2015) Outsourcing of public services in Europe and segmentation effects: The influence of labour market factors. European Journal of Industrial Relations21(4): 295–313.
27.
HaakestadHFribergJH (2020) Deskilling revisited: Labour migration, neo-Taylorism and the degradation of craft work in the Norwegian construction industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy41(3): 630–651.
28.
HallPASoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
HauMFBorelloA (2024) Between coping and resistance: Migrant networks and alternative forms of collectivism. Economic and Industrial Democracy45(4): 1067–1089.
30.
HøgedahlL (2020) The Danish labour market model: Is the bumblebee still flying? In: ChristiansenPMElklitJNedergaardP (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 559–576.
31.
HøgedahlLJørgensenH (2017) Development in the regulation of wages and working conditions: The employee perspective. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies7(1).
32.
IbsenCL (2024) Associational power resources: How organisational properties matter for the power of workers. In: ArnholtzJRefslundB (eds) Workers, Power and Society: Power Resource Theory in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
KorpiW (1978) Social democracy in welfare capitalism: Structural erosion, welfare backlash and incorporation?Acta Sociologica21(1_suppl): 97–111.
35.
KorpiW (1980) Social policy and distributional conflict in the capitalist democracies: A preliminary comparative framework. West European Politics3(3): 296–316.
36.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2009) InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
LillieN (2012) Subcontracting, posted migrants and labour market segmentation in Finland. British Journal of Industrial Relations50(1): 148–167.
38.
LillieNGreerI (2007) Industrial relations, migration, and neoliberal politics: The case of the European construction sector. Politics & Society35(4): 551–581.
39.
LillieNWagnerI (2015) Subcontracting, insecurity and posted work: Evidence from construction, meat processing and ship building. In: DrahokoupilJ (ed.) The Outsourcing Challenge: Organizing Workers across Fragmented Production Networks. Brussels: ETUI (The European Trade Union Institute), pp. 157–174.
40.
LillieNWagnerIBerntsenL (2014) Posted migration, spaces of exception, and the politics of labour relations in the European construction industry. In: HauptmeierMVidalM (eds) Comparative Political Economy of Work. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 312–331.
41.
MacKenzieRFordeC (2009) The rhetoric of the ‘good worker’ versus the realities of employers’ use and the experiences of migrant workers. Work, Employment and Society23(1): 142–159.
42.
MarinoSMartínez LucioM (2024) Power resource theories and the case of trade unions and migrant labour in increasingly fragmented labour markets. In: ArnholtzJRefslundB (eds) Workers, Power and Society: Power Resource Theory in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
43.
MeardiGMartínARieraML (2012) Constructing uncertainty: Unions and migrant labour in construction in Spain and the UK. Journal of Industrial Relations54(1): 5–21.
44.
OvergaardCJespersenMHøgedahlL, et al. (2023) Migrants’ work environment in the Danish construction sector: A scoping study. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies13(3). https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.135435
OvergårdCHøgedahlLThomsenTL, et al. (2023b) Migrantarbejderes arbejdsmiljø og sikkerhed i bygge- og anlægsbranchen: Hovedresultater. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitet.
47.
PioreM (1979) Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
RaessDBurgoonB (2015) Flexible work and immigration in Europe. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(1): 94–111.
49.
RefslundB (2021) When strong unions meet precarious migrants: Building trustful relations to unionise labour migrants in a high union-density setting. Economic and Industrial Democracy42(2): 314–335.
50.
RefslundBArnholtzJ (2022) Power resource theory revisited: The perils and promises for understanding contemporary labour politics. Economic and Industrial Democracy43(4): 1958–1979.
51.
RefslundBSippolaM (2022) Migrant workers trapped between individualism and collectivism: The formation of union-based workplace collectivism. Economic and Industrial Democracy43(3): 1004–1027.
52.
RuberyJ (2007) Developing segmentation theory: A thirty year perspective. Économies et Sociétés28: 941–964.
53.
RuberyJPiasnaA (2017) Labour market segmentation and deregulation of employment protection in the EU. In: PiasnaAMyantM (eds) Myths of Employment Deregulation: How it Neither Creates Jobs nor Reduces Labour Market Segmentation. Brussels: ETUI (The European Trade Union Institute).
54.
SchmalzSLudwigCWebsterE (2018) The power resources approach: Developments and challenges. Global Labour Journal9.
SpangerMAndersenM (2023) Convoluted mobility: On the precarious movements of transnational migrant workers. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies49(13): 3473–3491.
TattersallA (2010) Power in Coalition: Strategies for Strong Unions and Social Change. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
59.
TuttDPinkSDaintyARJ, et al. (2013) ‘In the air’ and below the horizon: Migrant workers in UK construction and the practice-based nature of learning and communicating OHS. Construction Management and Economics31(6): 515–527.
60.
WagnerILillieNBernstenL (2014) Posted migration, spaces of exception, and the politics of labour relations in the European construction industry. In: HauptmeierMVidalM (eds) Comparative Political Economy of Work. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
61.
WillsJMayJDattaK, et al. (2009) London’s migrant division of labour. European Urban and Regional Studies16(3): 257–271.
62.
WrightEO (1994) The analysis of poverty. In:Interrogating Inequality: Essays on Class Analysis, Socialism and Marxism. London: Verso.
63.
WrightEO (1995) The class analysis of poverty. International Journal of Health Services25(1): 85–100.
