By understanding both the role of unions as an ‘experience good’ and the place of inertia in contributing to the prevalence of non-unionism, this article suggests that a union default could have a major impact in recruiting new members. Drawing upon a sub-sample of non-union workers in unionised workplaces from a study conducted in New Zealand, the authors show that a significant minority would stay in membership and support a union default. These results have positive implications for understanding how to shape the preferences of non-union workers in union and non-union workplaces.
AndersonC (2003) The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin129(1): 139–167.
2.
BalesR (2017) Resurrecting labor. Maryland Law Review77(1): 1–46.
3.
BarbashJ (1987) Like nature, industrial relations abhors a vacuum. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations42(2): 168–179.
4.
BarnesR (2005) An analysis of passing on in New Zealand: The employer’s duty to manage concurrent bargaining in a mixed workplace. Auckland University Law Review11: 56–85.
5.
BlandenJMachinS (2003) Cross-generation correlations of union status for young people in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations41(3): 391–415.
6.
BlockSSachsB (2018) Clean slate for worker power: Building a just economy and democracy. Labor and Worklife Program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School.
7.
BoothAArulampalamW (2000) Union status of young men in Britain: A decade of change. Journal of Applied Econometrics15(3): 289–310.
8.
BoothJBuddJMundayK (2010) Never say never? Uncovering the never-unionized in the United States. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(1): 26–52.
9.
BrownCKrishnaA (2004) The skeptical shopper: A metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice. Journal of Consumer Research31(3): 529–539.
10.
BrysonA (2008) Union free-riding in Britain and New Zealand. Journal of Industrial Relations50(1): 5–24.
11.
BrysonAGomezR (2005) Why have workers stopped joining unions? The rise in never-membership in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(1): 67–92.
12.
FernieSMetcalfD (1995) Participation, contingent pay, representation and workplace performance: Evidence from Great Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations33(3): 379–415.
13.
FreemanRDiamondW (2001) Liking the workplace you have: The incumbency effect in preferences towards unions. Working paper No. 1115. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
14.
FreemanRMedoffJ (1984) What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
15.
GodardJFregeC (2013) Labor unions, alternative forms of representation, and the exercise of authority relations in U.S. workplaces. Industrial and Labor Relations Review66(1): 142–168.
16.
GomezRGundersonM (2004) The experience good model of trade union membership. In: WunnavaPV (ed.) The Changing Role of Unions: New Forms of Representation. New York: Sharp, pp. 92–112.
17.
GomezRGundersonMMeltzN (2002) Comparing youth and adult desire for unionization in Canada. British Journal of Industrial Relations40(3): 521–542.
18.
HarcourtMLamH (2011) Non-majority union representation conforms to ILO Freedom of Association Principles and (potentially) promotes inter-union collaboration: New Zealand lessons for Canada. Dalhousie Law Journal34(1): 115–141.
19.
HarcourtMGallGKumarRVCroucherR (2019) A union default: A policy to raise union membership, promote the freedom to associate, protect the freedom not to associate and progress union representation. Industrial Law Journal48(1): 66–97.
20.
HarcourtMGallGKumarRVCroucherR (2021) The role of unions in addressing behavioural market failures. Economic and Industrial Democracy42(4): 1165–1188.
21.
HarcourtMGallGWilsonMRubensteinK (2022) The potential of a union default to influence the preferences and choices of non-union workers in unionised workplaces. Economic and Industrial Democracy43(4): 1817–1841.
22.
HaynesPHollandPPymanATeicherJ (2008) Free riding in Australia. Economic and Industrial Democracy29(1): 7–34.
23.
JachimowiczJDuncanSWeberEJohnsonE (2018) When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy3(2): 159–186.
24.
KallasteEWoolfsonC (2009) The paradox of post-communist trade unionism: ‘You can’t want what you can’t imagine’. Economic and Labour Relations Review20(1): 93–110.
25.
KellyJHeeryE (1989) Full-time officers and trade union recruitment. British Journal of Industrial Relations27(2): 196–213.
26.
KentA (2021) New Zealand’s fair pay agreements: A new direction in sectoral and occupational bargaining. Labour & Industry31(3): 235–254.
27.
KlempererP (1987) Markets with consumer switching costs. Quarterly Journal of Economics102: 375–394.
28.
MeltzN (1989) Industrial relations: Balancing efficiency and equity. In: BarbashJBarbashK (eds) Theories and Concepts in Comparative Industrial Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 109–113.
29.
NelsonP (1970) Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy78(2): 311–329.
30.
PorterM (1974) Consumer behavior, retailer power and market performance in consumer goods industries. Review of Economics and Statistics56(4): 419–436.
31.
PorterM (1976) Interbrand Choice, Strategy and Bilateral Market Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
SachsB (2010) Enabling employee choice: A structural approach to the rules of union organising. Harvard Law Review123(3): 655–728.
33.
SunsteinC (2015) Choosing Not to Choose: Understanding the Value of Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
VestinEVulkanP (2022) Cohort differences in Swedish union membership 1956–2019 and the role of individualization. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies12(S8): 7–28.
35.
WeilerP (1990) Governing the Workplace: The Future of Labor and Employment Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
