This study analyses the moderating effect of union density on industrial employment and unemployment in advanced economies facing exposure to industrial robots. Applying random effects within-between regression models to a pseudo-panel of observations from 27 European countries and the United States over 1998–2019, the study finds that higher union density is associated with a greater decline in industry-sector employment for younger workers and workers with lower secondary education when robot exposure increases. It is also found that the unemployment rate declines more strongly in countries with low union density when robot exposure increases. These findings suggest that exposure to industrial robots promotes labour market dualization in strongly unionized countries, whereas workers with tertiary education and labour market tenure are the main beneficiaries from technological change.
AcemogluD (2003) Cross-country inequality trends. The Economic Journal113: F121–F149.
2.
AcemogluDRestrepoP (2019) Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives33(2): 3–30.
3.
AcemogluDRestrepoP (2020) Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy128(6): 2188–2244.
4.
AnttilaA-H (2021) Enemmän kuin numero tilastoissa: Teollisuusliiton jäsentutkimus 2020 [More than a statistic: Industrial Union Member Survey 2020]. Helsinki: Industrial Union of Finland.
5.
AutorD (2019) Work of the past, work of the future. NBER Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
AutorDSalomonsA (2018) Is automation labor share-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
7.
AutorDHDornD (2013) The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review103(5): 1553–1597.
8.
BecherMPontussonJ (2011) Whose interests do unions represent? Unionization by income in Western Europe. In: BradyD (ed.) Comparing European Workers Part B: Policies and Institutions. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 181–211.
9.
BellAJonesK (2014) Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods3(1): 133–153.
10.
BellAFairbrotherMJonesK (2018) Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity53(2): 1051–1074.
11.
BessenJ (2019) Automation and jobs: When technology boosts employment. Economic Policy34(100): 589–626.
12.
BiegertT (2017) Welfare benefits and unemployment in affluent democracies: The moderating role of the institutional insider/outsider divide. American Sociological Review82(5): 1037–1064.
13.
CarverLDoellgastV (2021) Dualism or solidarity? Conditions for union success in regulating precarious work. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(4): 367–385.
14.
ChecchiDNunziataL (2011) Models of unionism and unemployment. European Journal of Industrial Relations17(2): 141–152.
15.
ChiacchioFPetropoulosGPichlerD (2018) The impact of industrial robots on EU employment and wages: A local labour market approach. Bruegel Working Paper. Brussels: Bruegel.
16.
ChigbuBINekhwevhaFH (2020) The extent of job automation in the automobile sector in South Africa. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Epub ahead of print 27 July 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X20940779
17.
ChungH (2019) Dualization and subjective employment insecurity: Explaining the subjective employment insecurity divide between permanent and temporary workers across 23 European countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy40(3): 700–729.
18.
CséfalvayZ (2019) Robotization in Central and Eastern Europe: Catching up or dependence?European Planning Studies28(8): 1534–1553.
19.
DauthWFindeisenSSüdekumJWössnerN (2021) The adjustment of labor markets to robots. Journal of the European Economic Association19(6): 3104–3153.
20.
DeatonA (1986) Panel data from time series of cross-sections. Journal of Econometrics30(1–2): 109–126.
21.
DoellgastVLillieNPulignanoV (eds) (2018) Reconstructing Solidarity: Labour Unions, Precarious Work, and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
DurazziNGeyerL (2020) Social inclusion in the knowledge economy: Unions’ strategies and institutional change in the Austrian and German training systems. Socio-Economic Review18(1): 103–124.
23.
EbbinghausB (2001) When labour and capital collude: The political economy of early retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA. In: EbbinghausBManowP (eds) Comparing Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA. London: Routledge, pp. 76–101.
24.
EmmeneggerP (2014) The Power to Dismiss: Trade Unions and the Regulation of Job Security in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Eurofound (2018) New Tasks in Old Jobs: Drivers of Change and Implications for Job Quality. Luxembourg: EU Publications Office.
FreemanRBMedoffJL (1984) What do Unions do?New York: Basic Books.
28.
FreyCB (2019) The Technology Trap. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
FreyCBOsborneMA (2017) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change114: 254–280.
30.
GarneroA (2021) The impact of collective bargaining on employment and wage inequality: Evidence from a new taxonomy of bargaining systems. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(2): 185–202.
31.
GoosMManningASalomonsA (2014) Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review104(8): 2509–2526.
32.
GordonJC (2015) Protecting the unemployed: Varieties of unionism and the evolution of unemployment benefits and active labor market policy in the rich democracies. Socio-Economic Review13(1): 79–99.
33.
GorodzeiskyARichardsA (2013) Trade unions and migrant workers in Western Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations19(3): 239–254.
34.
GraetzGMichaelsG (2017) Is modern technology responsible for jobless recoveries?American Economic Review107(5): 168–173.
35.
GraetzGMichaelsG (2018) Robots at work. The Review of Economics and Statistics100(5): 753–768.
36.
GregoryTSalomonsAZierahnU (2018) Racing with or against the machine? Evidence from Europe. CESifo Working Papers, Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research (CESifo)
37.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2013) Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
HøgedahlLKongshøjK (2017) New trajectories of unionization in the Nordic Ghent countries: Changing labour market and welfare institutions. European Journal of Industrial Relations23(4): 365–380.
39.
IFR (International Federation of Robotics) (2020) World robotics: Industrial robots. Frankfurt: IFR Statistical Department.
40.
JansenGLehrA (2022) On the outside looking in? A micro-level analysis of insiders’ and outsiders’ trade union membership. Economic and Industrial Democracy43(1): 221–251.
41.
KeynesJM (1932) Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In: Essays in Persuasion. New York: Harcourt Brace.
42.
KorpiW (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43.
KrusellPRudankoL (2016) Unions in a frictional labor market. Journal of Monetary Economics80: 35–50.
44.
KrzywdzinskiM (2017) Automation, skill requirements and labour-use strategies: High-wage and low-wage approaches to high-tech manufacturing in the automotive industry. New Technology, Work and Employment32(3): 247–267.
45.
KurerT (2020) The declining middle: Occupational change, social status, and the populist right. Comparative Political Studies53(10–11): 1798–1835.
46.
MoeneKOWallersteinM (1995) How social democracy worked: Labor-market institutions. Politics & Society23(2): 185–211.
47.
MosimannNPontussonJ (2017) Solidaristic unionism and support for redistribution in contemporary Europe. World Politics69(3): 448–492.
48.
OECD (2017) OECD employment outlook 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.
49.
OECD and AIAS (2021) Institutional characteristics of trade unions, wage setting, state intervention and social pacts. Available at: www.oecd.org/employment/ictwss-database.htm
50.
Oude NijhuisD (2022) Middle-class interests, redistribution and the postwar success and failure of the solidaristic welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy32(1): 33–47.
51.
ParolinZ (2020) Organized labor and the employment trajectories of workers in routine jobs: Evidence from U.S. panel data. Working Paper at the Brookings Institution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
52.
RodgersWMFreemanR (2019) How Robots Are Beginning to Affect Workers and Their Wages. New York: The Century Foundation.
53.
RutherfordTDFrangiL (2021) Acted upon and acted through: Unions, consent and contestation vis-a-vis high performance work systems in the automobile industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy42(4): 983–1003.
54.
SimoniM (2013) The left and organized labor in low-inflation times. World Politics65(2): 314–349.
55.
SimoniMVlandasT (2021) Labour market liberalization and the rise of dualism in Europe as the interplay between governments, trade unions and the economy. Social Policy & Administration55(4): 637–658.
56.
SteigerwaldD (2010) Walter Reuther, the UAW, and the dilemmas of automation. Labor History51(3): 429–453.
57.
SüdekumJStiebaleJWössnerN (2020) Robots and the rise of European superstar firms. CEPR Discussion Paper. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
58.
UpchurchM (2018) Robots and AI at work: The prospects for singularity. New Technology, Work and Employment33(3): 205–218.
59.
Van RieTMarxIHoremansJ (2011) Ghent revisited: Unemployment insurance and union membership in Belgium and the Nordic countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations17(2): 125–139.
60.
VerbeekM (2008) Pseudo-panels and repeated cross-sections. In: MátyásLSevestreP (eds) The Econometrics of Panel Data, 3rd edn.Berlin: Springer, pp. 369–383.
61.
VisserJ (2012) The rise and fall of industrial unionism. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research18(2): 129–141.
62.
YashiroNKyyräTHwangHTuomalaJ (2020) Technology, labour market institutions and early retirement: Evidence from Finland. VATT Working Papers. Helsinki: VATT Institute for Economic Research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
