In this article the authors analyse social partner engagement in European sectoral social dialogue, testing two prominent theories to disentangle sector and country dynamics: institutional and resources and capabilities theories. While institutional theory accounted for certain social partner preferences, resources and capability theory proved stronger in predicting participation and provided insight into regulatory preferences. The authors conclude that resources and capability theory better explains their case, associating it with weaknesses of transnational governance. Specifically, limited incentives for participation mean that social partners with fewer resources forego participation, entailing pre-eminence of social partners with greater resources and hindering outcomes reflecting national institutional influences.
BaccaroLHowellC (2017) Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations since the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BaccaroLSimoniM (2007) Centralized wage bargaining and the ‘Celtic Tiger’ phenomenon. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society46(3): 426–455.
3.
BechterBBrandlB (2018) The hybridization of national collective bargaining systems: The impact of the economic crisis on the transformation of collective bargaining in the European Union. Economic and Industrial Democracy40(3): 469–489.
4.
BechterBBrandlBMeardiG (2012) Sectors or countries? Typologies and levels of analysis in comparative industrial relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations18(3): 185–202.
5.
BulfoneFAfonsoA (2020) Business against markets: Employer resistance to collective bargaining liberalization during the Eurozone crisis. Comparative Political Studies53(5): 809–846.
6.
CulpepperPD (2002) Powering, puzzling, and ‘pacting’: The informational logic of negotiated reforms. Journal of European Public Policy9(5): 774–790.
7.
CulpepperPDReganA (2014) Why don’t governments need trade unions anymore? The death of social pacts in Ireland and Italy. Socio-Economic Review12(4): 723–745.
8.
De BoerRBenedictusHvan der MeerM (2005) Broadening without intensification: The added value of the European social and sectoral dialogue. European Journal of Industrial Relations11(1): 51–70.
9.
Eurofound (2009) Representativeness of the European Social Partner Organisations: Hospitals. Dublin: Eurofound.
10.
Eurofound (2018) Representativeness of the European Social Partner Organisations: Metal Sector. Dublin: Eurofound.
11.
González BegegaSAraneaM (2018) The establishing of a European industrial relations system: Still under construction or chasing a chimera?Employee Relations40(4): 600–616.
12.
GoobermanLHauptmeierMHeeryE (2019a) The evolution of employers’ organisations in the United Kingdom: Extending countervailing power. Human Resource Management Journal29(1): 82–96.
13.
GoobermanLHauptmeierMHeeryE (2019b) The decline of employers’ associations in the UK, 1976–2014. Journal of Industrial Relations61(1): 11–32.
14.
HallPSoskiceD (2001) An introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: HallPSoskiceD (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–68.
15.
JacksonGMuellenbornT (2012) Understanding the role of institutions in industrial relations: Perspectives from classical sociological theory. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society51(s1): 472–500.
16.
KellerB (2003) Social dialogues: The state of the art a decade after Maastricht. Industrial Relations Journal34(5): 411–429.
17.
KellerBSörriesB (1999) The new European social dialogue: Old wine in new bottles?Journal of European Social Policy9(2): 111–125.
18.
KeuneMMarginsonP (2013) Transnational industrial relations as multi-level governance: Interdependencies in European social dialogue. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(3): 473–497.
19.
KorpiW (1985) Power resources approach vs. action and conflict: On causal and intentional explanations in the study of power. Sociological Theory3(2): 31–45.
20.
LéonardE (2008) European sectoral social dialogue: An analytical framework. European Journal of Industrial Relations14(4): 401–419.
21.
LéonardEPerinEPochetP (2011) The European sectoral social dialogue: Questions of representation and membership. Industrial Relations Journal42(3): 254–272.
22.
LévesqueCMurrayG (2010) Understanding union power: Resources and capabilities for renewing union capacity. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research16(3): 333–350.
23.
MarginsonP (2005) Industrial relations at European sector level: The weak link?Economic and Industrial Democracy26(4): 511–540.
24.
MarginsonP (2016) Governing work and employment relations in an internationalized economy: The institutional challenge. ILR Review69(5): 1033–1055.
25.
MartinCJSwankD (2012) The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
NorthDC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
OffeCWiesenthalH (1980) Two logics of collective action: Theoretical notes on social class and organizational form. Political Power and Social Theory1(1): 67–115.
28.
PochetPDegryseC (2016) Dialogue social européen: une relance ‘de la dernière chance’? OSE Opinion Paper, 17.
29.
PochetPPeetersALéonardEPerinE (2009) Dynamics of the European Sectoral Social Dialogue. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
30.
ProsserTJ (2016) Economic union without social union: The strange case of the European social dialogue. Journal of European Social Policy26(5): 460–472.
31.
ProsserTJ (2018) European Labour Movements in Crisis: From Indecision to Indifference. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
32.
ProsserTJPerinE (2015) European tripartism: Chimera or reality? The ‘new phase’ of the European social dialogue in the light of tripartite theory and practice. Business History57(3): 376–397.
33.
RefslundBArnholtzJ (2020) Bringing power resource theory back in in the study of labour politics. In: SASE 2020 Virtual Conference – Development Today: Accumulation, Surveillance, Redistribution, 18–21 July 2020.
34.
SeawrightJGerringJ (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly61(2): 294–308.
35.
SeeligerM (2017) Ambiguities of social Europe: Political agenda setting among trade unionists from Central and Eastern Europe and Western Europe. MPIfG Discussion Paper No. 17/1. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
36.
StreeckW (1994) European social policy after Maastricht: The ‘social dialogue’ and ‘subsidiarity’. Economic and Industrial Democracy15(2): 151–177.
37.
StreeckW (2009) Re-forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
ThelenK (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Van RieTMaesRDionDP (2015) Social dialogue. In: Employment and Social Developments in Europe 2015. Brussels: European Commission.
40.
VisserJBeentjesMvan GervenMDi StasioV (2009) The quality of industrial relations and the Lisbon Strategy. In: Industrial Relations in Europe 2008. Brussels: European Commission.
41.
WilkinsonAWoodG (2012) Institutions and employment relations: The state of the art. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society51(s1): 373–388.
42.
WrightCFWailesNLansburyRBamberGJ (2016) Conclusions: Beyond Varieties of Capitalism, towards convergence and internationalisation. In: BamberGJLansburyRWailesNWrightCF (eds) International and Comparative Employment Relations: National Regulation, Global Changes. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 341–361.
