This article explores unions’ ideas about representative participation in employee-driven development in the Norwegian public sector, using key documents from two unions for professionals and one general union. By means of qualitative ideational analysis, the article finds that none of the unions clearly conveys ideas linking representative participation to knowledge-based, employee-driven development, and the article argues that the potential for employee participation is not fully developed by these unions in the Norwegian public sector. Further, the analysis reveals differences between the unions in whether they describe their local representatives as a collective professional voice. These findings transcend the traditional division between professional associations and general unions, and raises new questions about the role of professional autonomy and knowledge in relation to representative participation and workplace development.
BangsJMacBeathJ (2012) Collective leadership: The role of teacher unions in encouraging teachers to take the lead in their own learning and in teacher policy. Professional Development in Education38(2): 331–343.
2.
Basic Agreement with the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities, KS (2018) KS Hovedavtalen 01.01.2018–31.12.2019 [Basic Agreement]. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget.
3.
Basic Agreement with the Employers’ Association Spekter (2018) Hovedavtale mellom arbeidsgiverforeningen Spekter og Akademikerne 01.01.2018–31.12.2021 [Basic Agreement]. Oslo: Spekter.
4.
BeckmanL (2005) Grundbok i idéanalys. Det kritiska studiet av texter och idéer [The basics of ideational analysis. The critical study of texts and ideas]. Stockholm: Santérus forlag.
5.
BlumerH (1954) What is wrong with social theory?American Sociological Review19(1): 3–10.
6.
BogenH (1991) Ansattes medbestemmelse—en trussel mot offentlig fornyelse? [Employees’ co-determination – a threat to public renewal?]. Fafo-report, Nr. 117.
7.
Bratberg Ø (2017) Tekstanalyse for samfunnsvitere [Textual analysis for social scientists]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
8.
ButlerPTregaskisO (2018) Distributed leadership and employee cynicism: Trade unions as joint change agents. Human Resource Management. Epub ahead of print 7 June 2018. DOI: 10.1111/1748–8583.12199
9.
CarakerEJørgensenHMadsenMOBaadsgaardK (2016) Representation without co-determination? Participation and co-determination for semi-professional shop stewards in the collective participation system in Denmark. Economic and Industrial Democracy37(2): 269–295.
10.
FalkumEHagenIMTrygstadSC (2009) Bedriftsdemokratiets tilstand. Medbestemmelse, medvirkning og innflytelse i 2009 [The state of working life democracy 2009]. Fafo-note 2009: 35.
11.
FauskeH (1991) Profesjonene—bremsekloss eller syndebukk [The professions – obstructing development or scapegoats]. Fafo-report, Nr. 118.
12.
FregeCMKellyJ (eds) (2004) Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
GeorgeS (1997) How to win the war of ideas. DissentSummer: 47–53.
HagenIMPapeA (1997) Medspillere eller motspillere? Lederes og tillitsvalgtes erfaringer med Hovedavtalen i staten [Experiences with the Basic Agreement in the public sector]. Fafo-report, Nr. 227.
17.
HagenIMTrygstadSC (2009) Local flexicuruty: Resolving the conflict between direct and representative participation. Transfer15(3–4): 557–577.
18.
HansenKAmundsenOAasenTMBGressgårdLJ (2017) Management practices for promoting employee-driven innovation. In: OeijPRusDPotFD (eds) Workplace Innovation: Theory, Research and Practice. Cham: Springer.
19.
HayC (2010) Ideas and the construction of interests. In: BélandDCoxRH (eds) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
HeiretJ (2007) Arbeidslivsforskning på norsk – mellom sosial ingeniørkunst og kritisk forståelse [Norwegian working life research – Between the art of social engineering and critical understanding]. In: HjellbrekkeJOlsenOJSakslindR (eds) Arbeid, kunnskap og sosial ulikhet [Work, knowledge and social inequality]. Oslo: Unipub.
21.
HeiretJ (2012) Three Norwegian varieties of a Nordic model: A historical perspective on working life relations. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies2(4): 45–66.
22.
HernesG (2006) Den norske mikromodellen. Virksomhetsstyring, partssamarbeid og sosial kapital [The Norwegian micro-model. Corporate governance, cooperation between employers and employees, and social capital]. Fafo-note, 2006: 25.
23.
HymanR (1997) The future of employee representation. British Journal of Industrial Relations35(3): 309–336.
24.
HymanR (2002) The future of unions. Just Labour1(1): 7–15.
25.
HymanRGumbrell-McCormickR (2010) Trade unions, politics and parties: Is a new configuration possible?Transfer16(3): 315–331.
26.
HøyrupS (2010) Employee-driven innovation and workplace learning: Basic concepts, approaches and themes. Transfer16(2): 143–154.
27.
JohnsonSMDonaldsonMLMungerMS, et al. (2009) Leading the local: Teachers union presidents chart their own course. Peabody Journal of Education84(3): 374–393.
28.
KarsethBNerlandM (2007) Building professionalism in a knowledge society: Examining discourses of knowledge in four professional associations. Journal of Education and Work20(4): 335–355.
29.
KnudsenH (1995) Employee Participation in Europe. London: Sage.
30.
KnudsenHBusckOLindJ (2011) Work environment quality: The role of workplace participation and democracy. Work, Employment and Society25(3): 379–396.
31.
KockaJ (2003) Comparison and beyond. History and Theory42(1): 39–44.
32.
LægreidP (1983) Medbestemmingsretten i den offentlige sektor og det politiske demokrati [Codetermination in the public sector and political democracy]. In: BerghT (ed.) Deltakerdemokratiet. Terori og praksis [Participatory democracy: Theory and practice]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
33.
LakoffG (2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
34.
LarsenLE (2015) Skolekultur i endring. Om lærernes deltakelse i utviklingen av den videregående skolen 1976–2010 [Changing school culture. On teachers’ participation in the development of the upper secondary school 1976–2010]. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
35.
LevinMNilssenTRavnJEØyumL (2012) Demokrati i arbeidslivet. Den norske samarbeidsmodellen som konkurransefortrinn [Work-life democracy. The Norwegian model of cooperation as a competitive advantage]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
36.
LiljaP (2014) Negotiating Teacher Professionalism: On the Symbolic Politics of Sweden’s Teacher Unions. Malmö: Malmö University Faculty of Education and Society.
37.
MausethagenS (2013) Reshaping teacher professionalism: An analysis of how teachers construct and negotiate professionalism under increasing accountability. PhD thesis, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo.
38.
MausethagenSGranlundL (2012) Contested discourses of teacher professionalism: Current tensions between education policy and teachers’ union. Journal of Education Policy27(6): 815–833.
39.
MesselJ (2009) LO og ‘de nye gruppene.’ Konseptualisering av arbeidstakerne 1975–1989 [LO and ‘the new groups’. Conceptualization of the employees 1975–1989]. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
40.
MichelsenS (2007) Arbeidslivsrelasjoner i endring. Om det akademiske ansettelsesforholdet og fagforeningenes medvirkning innen universitetene [Changing work life relations. On the academic employment relationship and the unions’ participation in the universities]. In: HjellbrekkeJOlsenOJSakslindR (eds) Arbeid, kunnskap og sosial ulikhet [Work, knowledge and social inequality]. Oslo: Unipub.
41.
MolandL (2017) Lokalt trepartssamarbeid om utviklingsprosjekter i kommunene [Local tripartite cooperation for development projects in the municipalities]. Fafo-report, 2017: 17.
42.
NerlandMKarsethB (2015) The knowledge work of professional associations: Approaches to standardisation and forms of legitimisation. Journal of Education and Work28(1): 1–23.
43.
NielsenPNielsenRNBambergerSG, et al. (2012) Capabilities for innovation: The Nordic model and employee participation. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies2(4): 85–115.
44.
Norwegian Public Report (2016) NOU 2016:3 Ved et vendepunkt: Fra ressursøkonomi til kunnskapsøkonomi [Report from a Norwegian public committee: At a turning point. From resource economy to knowledge economy]. Oslo: Departementenes serviceorganisasjon.
45.
PayneJ (2017) Towards a broad-based innovation policy in the UK: Can design help?Economic and Industrial Democracy38(3): 535–555.
46.
RaginC (1994) Constructing Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
47.
SaridakisGYangquigLJohnstoneS (2017) Does workplace partnership deliver mutual gains at work?Economic and Industrial Democracy. Epub ahead of print 5 December 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X17740431
48.
ScheuerS (1986) Fagforeninger mellem kollektiv og profesjon [Trade unions between the collective and the professional]. Gylling: Narayana Press.
49.
StevensonHGilliandA (2015) The teachers’ voice: Teacher unions at the heart of a new democratic professionalism. In: KneyberREversJ (eds) Flip the System. Abingdon: Routledge.
50.
TrygstadSCAlsosKHagenIMSteen JensenR (2015) Den norske modellen på virksomhetsnivå [The Norwegian model in the workplace]. Fafo-report, 2015: 18.
