Do international union alliances contribute to the effectiveness of international framework agreements? A comparative study of Telefonica and Portugal Telecom
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2021
Do international union alliances contribute to the effectiveness of international framework agreements? A comparative study of Telefonica and Portugal Telecom
This study explores how international union alliances (IUAs) contribute to the effectiveness of international framework agreements (IFAs) in emerging or developing economies. Drawing on a distinction between procedural and normative effectiveness, it conducts a longitudinal analysis based on detailed multi-level case studies of two telecom multinational companies – Telefonica and Portugal Telecom – which have signed IFAs. It explores the impact of four dimensions of IUAs (governance structures, material resources, deliberative processes and access to institutional resources) on the effectiveness of IFAs. Key conclusions highlight the importance of procedural effectiveness for normative effectiveness and the role of IUAs’ organizational and institutional resources in ensuring respect for workers’ rights through IFAs.
AnnerM (2007) The paradox of labour transnationalism: Trade union campaigns for labour standards in international institutions. In: PhelanG (ed.) The Future of Organised Labour: Global Perspectives. Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 63–90.
2.
ArmbrusterR (1998) Cross-border labor organizing in the garment and automobile industries: The Phillips Van-Husen and Ford Cuaatitlin cases. Journal of World-Systems Research4(1): 20–51.
3.
AuvergnonP (2008) L’Effectivité du droit du travail. À quelles conditions?Bordeaux: Presses universitaires de Bordeaux.
4.
BarreauJNgahaA (2012) L’impact des positionnements des négociateurs sur le contenu d’un accord-cadre international. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations67(1): 76–96.
5.
BensusanG (2013) Legislation and labor policy in Latin America: Crisis, renovation or restoration. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal34(3): 655–676.
6.
BourqueR (2005) Les Accords-Cadres internationaux (ACI) et la négociation collective internationale à l’ère de la mondialisation. Institut International d’études sociales (IIES). Geneva: International Labour Organization.
7.
BrookesM (2013) Varieties of power in transnational labor alliances: An analysis of workers’ structural, institutional, and coalitional power in the global economy. Labor Studies Journal38(3): 181–200.
ClarkIAlmondP (2006) Overview of the US business system. In: AlmondPFernerA (eds) American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations across National Borders. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–56.
10.
CompaL (2014) When in Rome: The exercise of power by foreign multinationals in the United States. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research20(2): 271–293.
11.
CottonEGumbrell-McCormickR (2012) Global unions as imperfect multilateral organizations: An international relations perspective. Economic and Industrial Democracy33(4): 707–728.
12.
CottonERoyleT (2014) Transnational organizing: A case study of contract workers in the Colombian mining industry. British Journal of Industrial Relations52(4): 705–724.
13.
CroucherRCottonE (2009) Global Unions Global Business: Global Union Federations and International Business. London: Middlesex University Press.
14.
DavisSHammerNWilliamsG, et al. (2011) Labour standards and capacity in global subcontracting chains: Evidence from a construction MNC. Industrial Relations Journal42(2): 124–138.
15.
DehnenV (2013) Transnational alliances for negotiating international framework agreements: Power relations and bargaining processes between global union federations and European work councils. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(3): 577–600.
16.
DehnenVPriesL (2014) International framework agreements: A thread in the web of transnational labour relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations20(4): 335–350.
17.
Dufour-PoirierMHennebertM-A (2015) The transnationalization of trade union action within multinational corporations: A comparative perspective. Economic and Industrial Democracy36(1): 73–98.
18.
EisenhardtK (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
19.
ErneR (2008) European Unions: Labor’s Quest for Transnational Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
EvansP (2014) National labor movements and transnational connections: Global labor’s evolving architecture under neoliberalism. Global Labour Journal5(3): 258–282.
21.
FairbrotherP (2013) Building transnational unionism: Australian transport maritime unions in the world. In: FairbrotherPHennebertM-ALévesqueC (eds) Transnational Trade Unionism: Building Union Power. New York: Routledge, pp. 101–120.
22.
FairbrotherPHammerN (2005) Global unions: Past efforts and future prospects. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations60(3): 405–431.
23.
FichterMMcCallumJ (2015) Implementing global frameworks agreements: The limits of social partnership. Global Networks15(Suppl.): S65–S85.
24.
FichterMHelfenMSchiederigK (2013) Transnational solidarity around global production networks? In: FairbrotherPHennebertM-ALévesqueC (eds) Transnational Trade Unionism: Building Union Power. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–222.
25.
GreerLHauptmeierM (2008) Political entrepreneurs and co-managers: Labour internationalism at four multinational auto companies. British Journal of Industrial Relations46(1): 76–97.
26.
GregorattiCMillerD (2011) International framework agreements for workers’ rights? Insights from River Rich Cambodia. Global Labour Journal2(2): 84–105.
27.
HelfenMFichterM (2013) Building transnational union networks across global production networks: Conceptualising a new arena of labour–management relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(3): 553–576.
28.
HennebertM-ABourqueR (2013) Opening the black box of cross-border union alliances: A case study. In: FairbrotherPHennebertM-ALévesqueC (eds) Transnational Trade Unionism: Building Union Power. New York: Routledge, pp. 223–242.
29.
HennebertM-AFairbrotherPLévesqueC (2012) The mobilization of international framework agreements: A source of power for social actors?Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal33(4): 691–714.
30.
ILO (International Labour Organization) (2016) Report IV. Decent Work in Global Supply Chains. International Labour Organization, 105th Session, Geneva: ILO.
ITUC (International Trade Union Confederation) (2015) ITUC Global Rights Index: The world’s worst countries for workers. Available at: www.ituc-csi.org
33.
LévesqueCMurrayG (2010) Trade-union cross-border alliances within MNCs: Disentangling union dynamics at the local, national and international levels. Industrial Relations Journal41(4): 312–332.
34.
LévesqueCHennebertM-AMurrayGBourqueR (2016) Corporate social responsibility and worker rights: Institutionalizing social dialogue through international framework agreements. Journal of Business Ethics. Epub ahead of print 5 November 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–016–3370–9.
35.
LillieN (2005) Union networks and global unionism in maritime shipping. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations60(1): 88–111.
36.
McCallumJK (2013) Global Unions, Local Power: The New Spirit of Transnational Labor Organizing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
MustchinSMartinez LucioM (2017) Transnational collective agreements and the development of new spaces for union action: The formal and informal uses of international and European framework agreements in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations55(3): 577–601.
38.
NiforouC (2012) International framework agreements and industrial relations governance: Global rhetoric versus local realities. British Journal of Industrial Relations50(2): 352–373.
39.
NiforouC (2014) International framework agreements and the democratic deficit of global labour governance. Economic and Industrial Democracy35(2): 367–386.
40.
OECD (2009) Overview: Data on informal employment and self-employment, from ‘Is informal normal?Towards more and better jobs in developing countries’. Available at: www.oecd.org/dev/employment
41.
PapadakisK (2011) Shaping Global Industrial Relations. The Impact of International Framework Agreements. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, ILO.
42.
PulignanoV (2005) EWCs and cross-national employee representative coordination: A case of trade-union cooperation?Economic and Industrial Democracy26(3): 383–412.
43.
PulignanoV (2011) European works councils and trade union networking. A new space for regulation and workers solidarity in Europe? In: BlackettALévesqueC (eds) Social Regionalism in the Global Economy. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 111–139.
44.
RiisgaardLHammerN (2011) Prospects for labour in global value chains: Labour standards in the cut flowers and bananas industries. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(1): 168–190.
45.
RobinsonP (2011) International framework agreements: Do workers benefit in a global banana supply chain? In: PapadakisK (ed.) Shaping Global Industrial Relations: The Impact of International Framework Agreements. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, International Labour Organization, pp. 164–178.
46.
SchillingerHR (2005) Trade unions in Africa: Weak but feared. Global Trade Union Programme, Friedrick-Ebert-Stiftung.
47.
SchomannISobczakAEckhardVWilkeP (2008) International framework agreements: New paths to workers’ participation in multinationals’ governance. Transfer14(1): 111–126.
48.
TurnbullP (2006) The war on Europe’s waterfront: Repertoires of power in the port transport industry. British Journal of Industrial Relations44(2): 305–326.
49.
WindmullerJ (2000) The international trade secretariats. In: GordonMTurnerL (eds) Transnational Cooperation among Labour Unions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 102–119.
50.
WilliamsGDaviesSCrispenC (2015) Subcontracting and labour standards: Reassessing the potential of international framework agreements. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(2): 181–203.
51.
YinRK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5. London: Sage.
