Using a mixed methods approach this article investigates the impact of the financial crisis and austerity on women’s employment and life chances in Spain and the UK through tracking women’s changing labour market transitions and exploring women’s responses to disrupted employment paths. Women’s experiences were found to be strongly influenced by the different employment and social models and the specific austerity policies. In Spain women faced increases in both labour market flexibility and segmentation, involving more entrapment in unemployment and temporary jobs and declining protection within permanent contracts. In the UK women retained more access to employment but faced destabilisation of public sector employment and a strong budget squeeze from wage and benefit cuts. They were less able than women in Spain to draw on both family support and unemployment benefits to reorient their careers, but in both countries women were resisting employment changes and reaffirming their commitment to employment.
AnttonenASipiläA (1996) European social care services. Is it possible to identify models?Journal of European Social Policy6(2): 87–100.
2.
AragonJRochaLDe La FuenteL (2011) La Negociación Colectiva y la Información Económica en España. Madrid: Fundación 1º de Mayo.
3.
BanyulsJRecioA (2015) A crisis inside the crisis: Spain under a conservative neoliberalism. In: LehndorffS (ed.) Divisive Integration: The Triumph of Failed Ideas in Europe – Revisited. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute, pp. 39–68.
4.
BartelheimerPVerdJMLehweß-LitzmannRet al. (2012) Unemployment, intervention and capabilities: A comparative study of Germany and Spain. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research18(1): 31–44.
5.
BertauxDThompsonP (1997) Pathways to Social Classes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
BettioFCorsiMD’IppolitiCet al. (2013) The impact of the economic crisis on the situation of women and men and on gender equality policies. External report commissioned by and presented to the EU Directorate-General for Justice, Unit D1 ‘Equality Between Women and Men’.
8.
BlythM (2013) Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
ClasenJ (2000) Motives, means and opportunities: Reforming unemployment compensation in the 1990s. West European Politics23(2): 89–112.
10.
ConleyH (2012) Economic crisis, austerity and gender equality: The UK case. Discussion paper, European Network of Legal Experts in the Field of Gender Equality. Available at: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/25963 (accessed 11 June 2017).
11.
CreswellJW (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
DalyM (2011) What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics18(1): 1–23.
13.
DenzinN (1989) Interpretative Biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
ElderGHJohnsonMKCrosnoeR (2004) The emergence and development of the life course theory. In: MortimerJTShanahanMJ (eds) Handbook of the Life Course. New York: Springer, pp. 3–19.
15.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
European Commission (2015) Report on Equality between Women and Men 2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
17.
FarnsworthKIrvingZ (2015) Social Policy in Times of Austerity. Bristol: Policy Press.
18.
Fernández-GutiérrezMDíaz-FuentesD (2009) Empleo público y temporalidad ¿Es el sector público parte del problema?Temas Laborales102: 51–87.
19.
GrimshawD (2014) Minimum wage trends during the crisis: The problem of stronger ‘minimum wage contours’ and weaker unions. In: Annual Progressive Economy Forum, Brussels European Parliament, March.
20.
GrimshawDRuberyJ (2012) The end of the UK’s liberal collectivist social model? The implications of the coalition government’s policy during the austerity crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics36(1): 105–126.
HallSM (2011) Exploring the ‘ethical everyday’: An ethnography of the ethics of family consumption. Geoforum42: 627–637.
23.
HallSM (2016) Everyday family experiences on the financial crisis: Getting by in the recent economic recession. Journal of Economic Geography16(2): 305–330.
24.
HarrisonE (2012) Bouncing back? Recession, resilience and everyday lives. Critical Social Policy33(1): 97–113.
25.
HermannC (2014) Structural adjustment and neoliberal convergence in labour markets and welfare: The impacts of the crisis and austerity measures on European economic and social models. Competition and Change18(2): 111–130.
26.
KaramessiniMRuberyJ (eds) (2013) Women and Austerity. Abingdon: Routledge.
27.
LehndorffS (ed.) (2015) Divisive Integration: The Triumph of Failed Ideas in Europe – Revisited. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
28.
LewisJ (2001) The decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care. Social Politics8(2): 152–169.
29.
LewisJKnijnTMartinCOstnerI (2008) Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation policies for parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society15(3): 261–286.
MillsMTsangFPragOet al. (2014) Gender Equality in the Workforce: Reconciling Work, Private and Family Life in Europe. Cambridge and Brussels: Rand.
32.
Moran-EllisJAlexanderVCroninAet al. (2006) Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research6(1): 45–59.
33.
MorenoFJMari-KloseP (2013) Youth, family change and welfare arrangements. European Societies15(4): 493–513.
34.
Muñoz de BustilloRAntónJ-I (2013) Those were the days, my friend: The public sector and the economic crisis in Spain. In: Vaughan-WhiteheadD (ed.) Public Sector Shock: The Impact of Policy Retrenchment in Europe. Geneva: ILO, pp. 511–542.
35.
NavarroV (2009) El cuarto pilar del estado del bienestar. Público, 15October.
36.
NicoMCaetanoA (2017) Untying conceptual knots: The analytical limits of the concepts of de-standardisation and reflexivity. Sociology51(3): 666–684.
37.
RitchieJLewisJElamG (2003) Designing and selecting samples. In: RitchieJLewisJ (eds) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage, pp. 77–108.
38.
RuberyJ (2013) Public sector adjustment and the threat to gender equality. In: Vaughan-WhiteheadD (ed.) Public Sector Shock: The Impact of Policy Retrenchment in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 43–83.
39.
SalidoO (2011) Female employment and policies for balancing work and family life in Spain. In: GuillenAMLeonM (eds) The Spanish Welfare State in European Context. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 187–208.
40.
SarasaS (2011) Long-term care: The persistence of familism. In: GuillenAMLeonM (eds) The Spanish Welfare State in European Context. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 237–258.
41.
ScottJDexSJoshiH (eds) (2008) Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
42.
ThornleyC (2007) Working part-time for the state: Gender, class and the public sector pay gap. Gender, Work and Organization144(5): 454–475.
43.
TornsTCarrasquerPMorenoSBorrasV (2013) Career paths in Spain: Gendered division of labour and informal employment. Revue Interventions Économiques47: 1–14.
44.
TUC (2015) The Impact on Women of Recession and Austerity. London: Trades Union Congress.
45.
VerdJMLópez-AndreuM (2011) The rewards of a qualitative approach to life-course research: The example of the effects of social protection policies on career paths. Forum: Qualitative Social Research12(3).
46.
WaldfogelJ (2011) Family-friendly policies. In: GreggPWadsworthJ (eds) The Labour Market in Winter: The State of Working Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–154.
