This article revisits the concept of union effectiveness and proposes a conceptual model to inform its study and application. Previous conceptual and empirical work is examined to identify key strengths and weaknesses, and to relate the union effectiveness concept to union renewal and other key concepts. This leads to the proposal of a Goal-System framework that builds and improves on prior research.
AckersP (2013) Trade unions as professional associations: Challenging some foundational radical assumptions of industrial relations analysis. In:BUIRA Conference, Glasgow.
2.
BadigannavarVKellyJ (2005) Why are some union organizing campaigns more successful than others?British Journal of Industrial Relations43(3): 515–535.
3.
BadigannavarVKellyJ (2011) Partnership and organizing: An empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK. Economic and Industrial Democracy32(1): 5–27.
4.
BatstoneE (1988) The frontier of control. In: GallieD (ed.) Employment in Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 218–247.
5.
BlackJGreeneAAckersP (1997) Size and effectiveness: A case study of a small union. Industrial Relations Journal28(2):136–148.
6.
BokDDunlopJT (1970) Labor and the American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
7.
BoxallPHaynesP (1997) Strategy and trade union effectiveness in a neo-liberal environment. British Journal of Industrial Relations35(4): 567–591.
8.
BrysonA (2005) Working with dinosaurs? Union effectiveness in Britain. In: GallG (ed.) Union Recognition: Organising and Bargaining Outcomes. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 25–43.
9.
BurchielliR (2004) It’s not just numbers: Union employees’ perceptions of union effectiveness. Journal of Industrial Relations46(3): 336–343.
10.
BurchielliRBartramT (2009) What helps organising work? The indicators and the facilitators of organising. Journal of Industrial Relations58(5): 587–707.
ChaisonGBigelowBOttensmeyerE (1993) Unions and legitimacy: A conceptual refinement. Research in the Sociology of Organizations12: 139–166.
13.
CharlwoodA (2004) Influences on trade union organizing effectiveness in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations42(1): 69–93.
14.
ClarkP (2009) Building More Effective Unions, 2nd edn.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
CrosbyM (2009) Cleanstart – fighting for a fair deal for cleaners. In: GallG (ed.) The Future of Union Organising. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 131–149.
16.
FioritoJGallG (2012) Why we need a survey of unions. WorkingUSA15(2): 217–232.
17.
FioritoJGrammCLHendricksWE (1991) Union structural choices. In: StraussGGallagherDGFioritoJ (eds) The State of the Unions. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 103–137.
18.
FioritoJJarleyPDelaneyJ (1993) National union effectiveness. Research in the Sociology of Organizations12: 111–137.
19.
FioritoJJarleyPDelaneyJ (1995) National union effectiveness in organizing: Measures and influences. Industrial and Labor Relations Review48(4): 613–635.
20.
FioritoJJarleyPDelaneyJ (2001) National unions as organisations. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management20: 231–268.
21.
FioritoJJarleyPDelaneyJ (2002) Information technology, US union organizing and union effectiveness. British Journal of Industrial Relations40(4): 627–658.
22.
FioritoJStepinaLJarleyP. (1997) Visions of success: National leaders’ views on union effectiveness. Labor Studies Journal22(1): 3–19.
23.
FreemanR (2007) America Works. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
FregeC (2002) Understanding union effectiveness in Central Eastern Europe: Hungary and Slovenia. European Journal of Industrial Relations8(1): 53–76.
25.
GahanPBellS (1999) Union strategy, membership orientation and union effectiveness: An exploratory analysis. Labour and Industry9(3): 5–30.
26.
GallG (2010) Resisting recession and redundancy – contemporary worker occupations in Britain. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society13(1): 105–129.
27.
GallG (2011) Union strategy and circumstance: Back to the future or forward to the past? In: WilkinsonATownsendK (eds) Research Handbook on Work and Employment Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 91–110.
28.
GallG (2013) New forms of labour conflict: A transnational perspective. In: AtzeniM (ed.) Workers and Labour in a Globalised Capitalism: Contemporary Themes and Theoretical Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
29.
HammerTWazeterD (1993) Dimensions of local union effectiveness. Industrial and Labor Relations Review46(2): 302–319.
30.
HickeyRKuruvillaSLakhaniT (2010) No panacea for success: Member activism, organizing and union renewal. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(1): 53–83.
31.
HymanR (2001) Understanding European Trade Unionism: Between Market, Class and Society. London: Sage.
32.
HymanR (2007) How can trade unions act strategically?Transfer13(2): 193–210.
33.
KellyJ (1996) Union militancy and social partnership. In: AckersPSmithCSmithP (eds) The New Workplace and Trade Unionism: Critical Perspectives on Work and Organization. London: Routledge, pp. 77–109.
34.
KoppleBCaplanCHanekeTSilkL (directors) (1990) American Dream (documentary film).
35.
LévesqueCMurrayG (2013) Renewing union narrative resources: How union capabilities make a difference. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(4): 777–796.
36.
LévesqueCMurrayG (2010) Understanding union power: Resources and capabilities for renewing union capacity. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research16(3): 333–350.
37.
MarchingtonMGrimshawDRuberyRWilmottH (eds) (2005) Fragmenting Work: Blurring Organizational Boundaries and Disordering Hierarchies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Muller-JentschW (1985) Trade unions as intermediary organizations. European Journal of Industrial Relations9(1): 3–33.
39.
MusteAJ (1928) Factional fights in trade unions: A view of human relations in the labor movement. In: HardmanJBS (ed.) American Labor Dynamics in the Light of Post-war Developments: An Inquiry by Thirty-two Labor Men, Teachers, Editors and Technicians. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co, pp. 332–348.
40.
OffeCWisenthalH (1985) Two logics of collective action. In: OffeC (ed.) Disorganized Capitalism: Contemporary Transformation of Work and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 170–220.
41.
PymanA (2002) Union effectiveness: Theorising a set of dimensions union effectiveness. In:16th AIRAANZ Conference, Queenstown, New Zealand.
42.
RoseJChaisonG (1990) New measures of union organizing effectiveness. Industrial Relations29(3): 457–468.
43.
RoseJChaisonG (1996) Linking union density and union effectiveness: The North American experience. Industrial Relations35(1):78–105.
44.
SayceSGreeneAAckersP (2006) Small is beautiful? The development of women’s activism in a small union. Industrial Relations Journal37(4): 400–414.
45.
SimmsMHolgateJ (2010) Organising for what? Where is the debate on the politics of organising?Work, Employment and Society24(1): 157–168.
46.
SouthworthCStepan-NorrisJ (2009) American trade unions and data limitations: A new agenda for labor studies. Annual Review of Sociology35: 297–320.
47.
SturmthalA (1973) Industrial relations strategies. In: SturmthalAScovilleJ (eds) The International Labor Movement in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 1–33.
48.
SullivanR (2010) Labour market or labour movement? The union density bias as barrier to labour renewal. Work, Employment and Society24(1): 145–156.
