Based on a respondent driven sampling survey with 500 Polish migrant workers in Denmark, this article argues that specific labour market institutions and sector differences need to be taken into account when explaining the working conditions of migrant workers. Comparing the working conditions of Polish and Danish workers, it is shown that labour market institutional arrangements provide a better explanation for the differences found between the two groups than differences in individual characteristics of the migrants and the Danish workforce. In addition, the article argues that factors such as institutionalized wage variability within sectors and the decentralized regulation of working conditions are important when assessing the potential implication of migrant workers in the labour market.
AndersenSKArnholtz HansenJ (2008) Strong trade unions meet EEC workers: Locating, monitoring and organising EEC workers in the Danish construction sector. In: BlainpainRDickensL (eds) Challenges in European Employment Relations. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
2.
Arnholtz HansenJAndersenSK (2008) Østeuropæiske arbejdere i bygge- og anlægsbranchen – Rekrutteringsstrategier og konsekvenser for løn-, ansættelses- og aftaleforhold. FAOS Report, January. FAOS, Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen.
3.
Arnholtz HansenJWesley HansenN (2009) Polonia i København – et studie af polske arbejdsmigranters løn-, arbejds- og levevilkår i Storkøbenhavn. LO-dokumentation 1/2009.
4.
BarrellRFitzgeraldJRileyR (2010) EU enlargement and migration: Assessing the macroeconomic impacts. Journal of Common Market Studies48(2): 373–395.
5.
BasuB (2004) Labour migration in European Union countries. International Labour Mobility. New York: Routledge.
6.
BonifaziC (2008) Evolution of regional patterns of international migration in Europe. In: BonifaziC. (eds) International Migration in Europe: New Trends and New Methods of Analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 107–128.
7.
BonifaziCOkolskiMSchoorlJSimonP (2008) Introduction. In: BonifaziC. (eds) International Migration in Europe: New Trends and New Methods of Analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 9–16.
8.
BurrHAlbertsenK (2005) Arbejdstid. Copenhagen: National Centre for the Working Environment.
9.
CoxTMasonB (2000) Trends and developments in east central European industrial relations. Industrial Relations Journal31(2): 97–114.
10.
DA (Confederation of Danish Employers) (2009) Arbejdsmarkedsrapport 2008. Arbejdstid og arbejdsliv. Copenhagen: DA Publishing.
DølvikJEEldringL (2008) Arbeidsmobilitet fra de nye EU-landene til Norden - Utviklingstrekk og konsekvenser. Nordic Council of Ministers, 2008:502.
13.
DueJMadsenJSJensenCS (1993) Den danske model – en historisk sociologisk analyse af det kollektive aftalesystem. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
14.
DundonTGonzalez-PerezMAMcDonoughT (2007) Bitten by the Celtic tiger: Immigrant workers and industrial relations in the new ‘glocalized’ Ireland. Economic and Industrial Democracy28(4): 501–522.
15.
EU Commission (2008) The impact of free movement of workers in the context of EU enlargement. COM 765 final.
16.
Eurofound (2007) Industrial relations in EU member states 2000–2004.
17.
FavellA (2009) After enlargement: Europe’s new migration system and its hidden political economy of immigration. In: European Union Studies Association Conference, Los Angeles, April 2009.
18.
FitzgeraldIHardyJ (2010) ‘Thinking outside the box’? Trade union organizing strategies and Polish migrant workers in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(1): 131–150.
19.
FribergJHTyldumG (2007) Polonia i Oslo – En studie av arbeids- og levekår blant polakker i hovedstadsområdet. Oslo: Fafo.
20.
GallieD (2007) Production regimes and the quality of employment in Europe. The Annual Review of Sociology33: 85–104.
21.
HeckathornDD (1997) Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems44: 174–199.
22.
HerreraD (2008) Immigration, work and skills in three economic sectors in Catalonia (Spain): Domestic service, building and catering. In: International Sociological Association Forum of Sociology, RC30, Barcelona5–8 September 2008.
23.
IbsenCLMadsenJSDueJ (2011) Fra dobbeltmedlemskab til dobbelt fravalg. Den voksende outsidergruppe i den danske model. In: LarsenTP (ed.) Insidere og Outsidere – Den danske models rækkevidde. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
24.
IlsøeA (2010) Between trust and control: Company level bargaining on flexible working hours in the Danish and German metal industries. Industrial Relations Journal41(1): 34–51
25.
KahanecMZimmermannKF (2009) Migration in an enlarged EU: A challenging solution. Economic Papers 363, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.
26.
KringsT (2009) Organised labour and migration in the global age: A comparative analysis of trade union responses to migrant labour in Austria, Germany, Ireland and the UK. PhD Dissertation, School of Law and Government, Dublin City University.
27.
KringsTBobekAMoriartyE. (2011) From boom to bust: Migrant labour and employers in the Irish construction sector. Economic and Industrial Democracy32(3): 459–476.
28.
LarsenTPNavrbjergSEJohansenMM (2010) Tillidsrepræsentanten på arbejdspladsen. Rapport 1. TR-undersøgelsen. Copenhagen: LO.
29.
LillieN (2010) Bringing the offshore ashore: Transnational production, industrial relations and the reconfiguration of sovereignty. International Studies Quarterly54(3): 683–704.
30.
LillieNGreerI (2007) Industrial relations, migration, and neoliberal politics: The case of the European construction sector. Politics and Society35(4): 551–581.
31.
LockeRMThelenK (1995) Apples and oranges revisited: Contextualized comparisons and the study of comparative labor politics. Politics and Society23(3): 337–367.
32.
McGovernP (2007) Immigration, labour markets and employment relations: Problems and prospects. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(2): 217–235.
33.
McLaffertySPrestonV (1992) Spatial mismatch and labor market segmentation for African-American and Latina women. Economic Geography68(4): 406–431.
34.
PeckJ (1996) Work Place: The Social Regulation of Labour Markets. London: Guilford Press.
35.
PennixRRoosbladJ (2000) Trade Unions, Immigration, and Immigrants in Europe, 1960–1993: A Comparative Study of the Attitudes and Actions of the Trade Unions in Seven West European Countries. Amsterdam: Berghahn Books.
36.
PioreMJ (1980) Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
PortesABöröczJ (1989) Contemporary immigration: Theoretical perspectives on its determinants and modes of incorporation. International Migration Review23(3): 606–630.
38.
ReegerUSieversW (2009) Statistics and migration: Past, present and future. In: FassmannHReegerUSieversW (eds) Statistics and Reality: Concepts and Measurements of Migration in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 297–312.
39.
RuberyJ (1978) Structured labour markets, worker organisation and low pay. Cambridge Journal of Economics2(1): 17–36.
40.
RuberyJ (2006) Segmentation theory thirty years on. Working Paper September2006, European Work and Employment Research Centre.
41.
SalamonM (2002) Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice, 4th edn.Harlow: Prentice Hall.
42.
SalganikMJHeckathornDD (2004) Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology34: 193–239.
43.
TerryM (1994) Workplace unionism: Redefining structures and objectives. In: HymanRFernerA (eds) New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 223–249.
44.
TillyC (2011) The impact of the economic crisis on international migration: A review. Work, Employment and Society25(4): 675–692.
45.
TorresA (1997) Labor market segmentation: African American and Puerto Rican labor in New York City, 1960–1980. In: StewartJB (ed.) African Americans and Post-Industrial Labor Markets. London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 205–223.
46.
WoolfsonCSommersJ (2006) Labour mobility in construction: European implications of the Laval un Partneri dispute with Swedish labour. European Journal of Industrial Relations12(1): 49–68.
