This article examines whether Japanese trade unions have developed greater levels of international cooperation as a result of increased regional integration, i.e. economic partnerships with Asian counterparts in the 2000s. Labor rights at the regional level or resources that allow workers to organize are absent in the Japanese case; therefore, its analysis enriches understanding of the impact of those elements on labor internationalism in varieties of international regional integration. Economic partnership agreements were found not to be an incentive for building relations among Japanese and fellow international trade unions. Instead, cooperation was found to be contingent on already established ties. The article also demonstrates a growing interest among Japanese and other trade unions in responding to regional projects of the East Asian Community and Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC).
AnnerM (2003) Industrial structure, the state, and ideology: Shaping labor transnationalism in the Brazilian auto industry. Social Science History27(4): 603–634.
4.
Asian Regional Trade Union Solidarity Conference (2003) Final Statement and Action Plan of the Asian Regional Trade Union Solidarity Conference. Available at: kctu.org/3125.
5.
BamberGJ (2005) How is the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum developing? Comparative comments on APEC and employment relations. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal26(4): 423–444.
6.
BensonJ (1996) A typology of Japanese enterprise unions. British Journal of Industrial Relations34(3): 371–386.
7.
BielerA (2002) Austria’s and Sweden’s accession to the European Union: A comparative neo-Gramscian analysis. In: BreslinSHughesCPhillipsNRosamondB (eds) New Regionalism in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Concepts. London: Routledge, pp. 150–162.
8.
BielerA (2006) The Struggle for a Social Europe: Trade Unions and the EMU in Times of Global Restructuring. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
9.
Biothai (2007) Fighting FTAs: The experience of Thailand. In: bilaterals.org-Biothai-GRAIN (eds) Fighting FTAs: The Growing Resistance to Bilateral Free Trade and Investment Agreements. Bilaterals.org, pp. 36–43.
10.
BurgoonBJacobyB (2004) Patch-work solidarity: Describing and explaining US and European labour internationalism. Review of International Political Economy11(5): 848–879.
11.
CarawayTL (2009) Labor rights in East Asia: Progress or regress?Journal of East Asian Studies9(2): 153–186.
12.
ChanJ (2008) Another Japan is Possible: New Social Movements and Global Citizenship Education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
ChaseKA (2008) Moving Hollywood abroad: Divided labor markets and the new politics of trade in services. International Organization62 (Fall): 653–687.
14.
ChorevN (2005) The institutional project of neo-liberal globalism: The WTO. Theory and Society34(3): 317–355.
15.
ChorevN (2010) Fixing globalization institutionally: US domestic politics of international trade. International Sociology25(1): 54–74.
16.
CoxRW (1971) Labor and transnational relations. International Organization25(3): 554–584.
17.
EbbinghausBVisserJ (1996) European Labor and Transnational Solidarity: Challenges, Pathways, and Barriers. Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung(MZES).
18.
ErneR (2008) European Unions: Labor’s Quest for a Transnational Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19.
EvansRKayT (2008) How environmentalists ‘greened’ trade policy: Strategic action and the architecture of field overlap. American Sociological Review73(6): 970–991.
20.
FregeCKellyJE (2003) Union revitalization strategies in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations9(1): 7–24.
21.
GajewskaK (2008) The emergence of a European labour protest movement?European Journal of Industrial Relations14(1): 104–121.
22.
GajewskaK (2009) Transnational Labour Solidarity: Mechanisms of Commitment to Co-operation within the European Trade Union Movement. London and New York: Routledge.
23.
GordonA (1998) The Wages of Affluence: Labor and Management in Postwar Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
HaasEB (1968) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950–1957. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
HymanR (2005) Trade unions and the politics of the European Social Model. Economic and Industrial Democracy26(1): 9–40.
26.
International Trade Union Confederation Asia Pacific (2007) Action Programme: For United Trade Union Action in Asia and Pacific. Founding Conference, Bangalooru, India, 5–6 September.
27.
JeongDYAguileraRV (2008) The evolution of enterprise unionism in Japan: A socio-political perspective. British Journal of Industrial Relations46(1): 98–132.
28.
JonesDMSmithMLR (2007) Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian regional order. International Security32(1): 148–184.
29.
KaminskaMEVisserJ (2011) The emergence of industrial relations in regional trade blocks: A comparative analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(2): 256–281.
30.
KawaiMWignarajaG (2008) EAFTA or CEPEA: Which way forward?ASEAN Economic Bulletin25(2): 113–139.
31.
KayT (2005) Labor transnationalism and global governance: The impact of NAFTA on transnational labor relationships in North America. American Journal of Sociology111(3): 715–756.
32.
KayT (2011) Legal transnationalism: The relationship between transnational social movement building and international law. Law and Social Inquiry36(2): 419–454.
33.
KellerB (1997) European integration, workers’ participation, and collective bargaining: A Euro-pessimistic view. In: UngerBVan WaardenF (eds) Convergence or Diversity? Internationalization and Economic Policy Response. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 252–277.
34.
Koch-BaumgartenS (1999) Gewerkschaftsinternationalismus und die Herausforderung der Globalisierung: Das Beispiel der Internationalen Transportarbeiterföderation(ITF). Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag.
35.
KoteraA (2005) Economic partnership agreements and the ‘East Asian Community’ – The meaning of the Japan–Philippines EPA. Column 0120. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, IAA.
36.
LawlerJJSuttawetC (2000) Labour unions, globalization and deregulation in Thailand. Asia Pacific Business Review6(3): 214–238.
37.
Lay HweeY (2006) Japan, ASEAN, and the construction of an East Asian community. Contemporary Southeast Asia28(2): 259–275.
38.
LeQueuxS (2008) Acting together for another world? Anti-globalisation and labour organisations. International Journal of Social Inquiry1(2): 135–154.
39.
LockeRMThelenK (1995) Apples and oranges revisited: Contextualized comparisons and the study of comparative labor politics. Politics and Society23(3): 337–367.
40.
LogueJ (1980) Towards Theory of Trade Union Internationalism. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
41.
MagnetteP (2003) European and civic participation: Beyond elitist citizenship?Political Studies51: 144–160.
42.
MangerM (2005) Competition and bilateralism in trade policy: The case of Japan’s free trade agreements. Review of International Political Economy12(5): 804–828.
43.
MarginsonP (2005) Industrial relations at European sector level: The weak link. Economic and Industrial Democracy26(4): 511–540.
44.
MarksGMcAdamD (1996) Social movements and the changing structure of political opportunity in the European Union. In: MarksGScharpfFWSchmitterPCStreeckW (eds) Governance in the European Union. London: Sage, pp. 95–120.
45.
MartinARossG (2001) Trade union organizing at the European level: The dilemma of borrowed resources. In: ImigDTarrowS (eds) Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 53–76.
46.
MeardiG (2002) Trojan horse for the Americanization of Europe? Polish industrial relations toward the EU. European Journal of Industrial Relations8(1): 77–99.
O’BrienR (2000) Workers and world order: The tentative transformation of the international union movement. Review of International Studies26: 533–555.
49.
O’BrienR (2008a) Labour, globalization, and the attempt to build transnational community. In: BrydonDColemanWD (eds) Renegotiating Community: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Global ContextsVacouver: UBC Press, pp. 164–182.
50.
O’BrienR (2008b) No safe havens: Labour, regional integration and globalisation. In: CooperAF. (eds) Regionalisation and Global Governance: The Taming of Globalisation?London and New York: Routledge, pp. 142–156.
51.
PetitP (2006) Globalisation and regional integration: A comparative analysis of Europe and East Asia. Competition and Change10(2): 113–140.
52.
PolányiK (2001 [1944]) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
53.
PriceJ (2000) Challenging APEC: The Asia Pacific labour network and APEC’s human resource development working group. Asia Pacific Business Review6(3): 34–53.
54.
RamseyH (1997) Solidarity at last? International trade unionism approaching the millennium. Economic and Industrial Democracy18(4): 503–537.
55.
RanaldP (1999) Analysing, organising, resisting: Union responses to the Asian economic crisis in East Asia, South Korea and the Philippines. The Journal of Industrial Relations41(2): 295–325.
56.
RavenhillJ (2010) The ‘new East Asian regionalism’: A political domino effect. Review of International Political Economy17(2): 178–208.
57.
SchömannI (2011) EU integration and EU initiatives on employee participation and social dialogue. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research17(2): 239–249.
58.
ShimizuH. (1998) Discussion: On the international activities of Japanese trade unions. Bulletin: Center for Transnational Labor Studies No. 4.
59.
SissenichB (2008) Cross-national policy networks and the state: EU social policy transfer to Poland and Hungary. European Journal of International Relations14(3): 455–487.
60.
SmismansS (2003) European civil society: Shaped by discourses and institutional interests. European Law Journal9(4): 473–495.
61.
SohnBH (2002) Regionalization of trade and investment in East Asia and prospects for further regional integration. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy7(2): 160–181.
62.
SolisM (2010) Can FTAs deliver market liberalization in Japan? A study of domestic political determinants. Review of International Political Economy17(2): 209–237.
63.
StewartP (2006) Marginal movements and minority struggles? The case of the Japanese minority social and labour movements. The Sociology Review54(4): 753–773.
64.
StreeckW (1998) La logique des stratégies politiques de class dans l’espace transnational. In: NadelHLindleyR (eds) Les Relations sociales en Europe: economie et institutions. Paris: l’Harmattan.
65.
StreeckW (1999) Competitive solidarity: Rethinking the ‘European Social Model’. MPIfG Working Paper 99/8.
66.
StreeckWSchmitterPC (1991) From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: Organized interests in the Single European Market. Politics and Society19(2): 133–164.
67.
SuominenK (2009) The changing anatomy of regional trade agreements in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies9(1): 29–56.
68.
SuzukiA (2008) Community unions in Japan: Similarities and differences of region-based labour movements between Japan and other industrialized countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy29(4): 492–520.
69.
TaylorGMathersA (2002) The politics of European integration: A European labour movement in the making?Capital and Class26(3): 39–60.
70.
Traub-MerzREcklJ (2007) International trade union movement: Mergers and contradictions. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung International Trade Union Cooperation, Briefing Papers No. 1.
71.
TurnerL (1996) The Europeanisation of labour: Structure before action. European Journal of Industrial Relations2(3): 325–344.
72.
UpchurchMTaylorGMathersA (2009) The crisis of ‘social democratic’ unionism, the ‘opening up’ of civil society and the prospects for union renewal in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. Labor Studies Journal34(4): 519–542.
73.
UranoEIStewartP (2009) Beyond organised labour in Japan: The case of the Japanese community union federation. In: McBrideJGreenwoodI (eds) Community Unionism: A Comparative Analysis of Concepts and Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 121–138.
74.
VisserJ (1998) Learning to play: The Europeanization of trade unions. In: PasturePVerberckmoesJ (eds) Working-Class Internationalism and Appeal of National Identity: Historical Debates and Current Perspectives. Oxford and New York: Berg.
75.
VossKShermanR (2000) Breaking the iron law of oligarchy: Union revitalization in the American labor movement. American Journal of Sociology106(2): 303–349.
76.
Warleigh-LackA (2006) Towards a conceptual framework for regionalization: Bridging ‘new regionalism’ and ‘integration theory’. Review of International Political Economy13(5): 750–771.
77.
WatermanP (1998) Globalization, Social Movements and the New Internationalisms. London: Mansel.
78.
WeathersC (2010) The rising voice of Japan’s community unions. In: VinkenHNishimuraYWhiteBLJDeguchiM (eds) Civic Engagement in Contemporary Japan: Established and Emerging Repertoire. New York: Springer, pp. 67–83.
79.
WilliamsonH (1994) Coping with the Miracle: Japan’s Unions Explore New International Relations. London: Pluto Press.
80.
Xinhua (2009) S Korea, Japan fail to agree on resuming free trade negotiations. bilaterals.org, 23December.
