This article examines the extent to which industrial democracy theory may be applied to the operation of Canadian pension fund boards by analysing the balance of power between employers, employees and unions on joint consultative private and public sector pension boards in Ontario and Quebec. The article focuses on three indicators of industrial democracy: shareholder activism; involvement in fund investment policies (including socially responsible investment); and forms of collective action to invest pension funds in support of union objectives. It concludes that industrial democracy is stronger where it is supported by traditions of tripartism and concertation and by statutory employee rights to representation on private sector funds. Its conclusions also question whether Canada can be classed unequivocally as a ‘liberal market economy’, on the grounds that the economic regulatory regime in Quebec differs substantially from the rest of the country.
Ambachtsheer K., Capelle R. and Lum H. ( 2007) The State of Global Pension Fund Governance Today: Board Competency still a Problem. Toronto: University of Toronto, Rotman International Centre for Pension Management (ICPM Toronto).
2.
Archer K. ( 1985) The failure of the new democratic party: Unions, unionists and politics in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science18(2): 353-366.
3.
Atkinson R. and Flint J. ( 2001) Accessing hidden and hard to reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update33: 1-4.
4.
Bélanger PR, Lapointe P-A. and Lévesque B. ( 2002) Workplace innovation and the role of institutions . In: Murray G, Bélanger J, Giles A and Lapointe P-A (eds) Work and Employment Relations in the High Performance Workplace. London and New York: Continuum, 150-180.
5.
Campolieti M., Gomez R. and Gunderson M. ( 2007) Say what? Employee voice in Canada. In: Freeman RB, Boxall P and Haynes P (eds) What Workers Say: Employee Voice in the Anglo-American Workplace. Ithaca, NY and London : ILR Press, 49-71.
6.
Carmichael I. ( 2005) Pension Power: Unions, Pension Funds and Social Investment in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
7.
Clark GL ( 2008) Governing finance: Global imperatives and the challenge of reconciling community representation with expertise. Economic Geography84(3): 281-302.
8.
Coates K. and Topham A. ( 1968) Industrial Democracy in Great Britain. London: Macgibbon and Kee.
9.
Cocco JF and Volpin PF ( 2007) Corporate governance of pension plans: The UK evidence . Financial Analysts Journal63(1): 70-83.
10.
Colvin AJS and Darbishire OR ( 2009) The emerging Anglo-American model: Convergence in industrial relations institutions?Paper presented at the 15th World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association , Sydney, August.
11.
Committee on Workers’ Capital. (2009 ) Available at: www.workerscapital.org.
12.
Compston H. ( 2003) Beyond corporatism: A configurational theory of policy concertation. European Journal of Political Research42(6): 787-809.
13.
Cressey P. ( 2009) Employee participation. In: Gold M (ed.) Employment Policy in the European Union: Origins, Themes and Prospects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 139-159.
14.
Crispo J. ( 1978) Industrial Democracy in Western Europe: A North American Perspective. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
15.
Dundon T., Wilkinson A., Marchington M. and Ackers P. ( 2004) The meanings and purpose of employee voice. International Journal of Human Resource Management15(6): 1149-1170.
16.
Godard J. ( 2009) Institutional environments, work and human resource practices, and unions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(2): 173-199.
17.
Gold M. ( 2005) Worker directors in the UK and the limits of policy transfer from Europe since the 1970s. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations20 (Autumn): 29-65.
18.
Gold M. ( 2008) A silent revolution? The role of union trustees in occupational pension funds in the UK: Lessons from the 1970s and 1980s . Historical Studies in Industrial Relations25/26: 141-176.
19.
Hall PA and Soskice D (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
20.
Hancké B, Rhodes M and Thatcher M (eds) ( 2007) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Heller F., Pusic E., Strauss G. and Wilpert B. ( 1998) Organisational Participation: Myth and Reality . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
22.
Hess D. ( 2005) Protecting and politicizing public fund assets: Empirical evidence on the effects of governance structures and practices. University of California Davis Law Review39: 187-227.
23.
Lukes S. ( 1974) Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke : Macmillan.
24.
Ontario Expert Commission on Pensions. (2007 ) Reviewing Ontario’s Pension System: What are the Issues? Available at: www.pensionreview.on.ca.
25.
OPSEU (Ontario Public Sector Employees’ Union). ( 2004) Policy Statement with Respect to Union Appointed Trustees and Sponsors for Jointly Trusteed Plans. Available at: www.OPSEU.org/benefit/policyReport.pdf.
26.
OPSEU (Ontario Public Sector Employees’ Union). ( 2009) Ontario Public Service Employees’ Union Submission to Ontario’s Ministry of Finance. Comments on the Report of the Expert Commission on Pensions. 27 February. Available at: www.fin.gov.on.ca.
27.
Pateman C. ( 1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Payne J. and Keep E. ( 2005) Promoting workplace development: Lessons for UK policy from Nordic approaches to job redesign and the quality of working life . In: Harley B, Hyman J and Thompson P (eds) Participation and Democracy at Work: Essays in Honour of Harvie Ramsay. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 146-165.
29.
Poole M. ( 1986) Towards a New Industrial Democracy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
30.
Quarter J., Carmichael I. and Ryan S. ( 2008) Pensions at Work: Social Responsible Investment of Union-based Pension Funds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
31.
Rafferty M., Ham R. and Bryan D. ( 2008) Governance and performance in superannuation fund management - an issues and research design article. Report to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), April.
32.
Régie des rentes du Québec. (2008) Available at: www.rrq.gouv.qc.ca.
33.
Sayce S. ( 2008) Diversity in pension trusteeship. Paper presented at the International Employee Relations Association Conference , Nijmegen, July.
34.
Sayce S. ( 2009) Pension trusteeship and diversity. Report to the Canadian High Commission, February.
35.
Schuller T. ( 1985) Democracy at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Schuller T. ( 1986) Age, Capital and Democracy: Member Participation in Pension Scheme Management. Aldershot: Gower .
37.
Schuller T. and Hyman J. ( 1983) Pensions: The voluntary growth of participation . Industrial Relations Journal14(1): 70-79.
38.
Schuller T. and Hyman J. ( 1984) Forms of ownership and control: Decision-making within a financial institution. Sociology18(1): 51-70.
39.
Summers J. and Hyman J. ( 2005) Employee Participation and Company Performance . York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation .
40.
Thompson M. and Taras DG ( 2005) Employment relations in Canada. In: Bamber GJ, Lansbury RD and Wailes N (eds) International and Comparative Employment Relations. London : Sage, 91-118.
41.
Thornton R. ( 2006) Ethical investments: A case of disjointed thinking . Cambridge Law Journal67(2): 396-422.
42.
Verma A. and Weststar J. ( 2008) Are labour trustees marginalized on pension boards?Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference Proceedings Vol. 29.
43.
Weststar J. and Verma A. ( 2007) What makes for effective labour representation on pension boards? Labour Studies Journal32(4): 382-410.
44.
Weststar J. and Verma A. ( 2008) Just having it is not enough: Labour’s voice on pension boards. In: Quarter J, Carmichael I and Ryan S (eds) Pensions at Work: Social Responsible Investment of Union-based Pension Funds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 42-69.
