This article looks at the economic and social changes confronting trade unions in
Finland, and how the unions are responding to these changes. The original empirical
research comprises a sample of 12 unions, and the interviews with union leaders,
officials and trustees focus on the societal changes and the ensuing union responses
from the interviewees’ own experience and point of view. Finland has seen
a change from strike-prone unionism towards labour–management cooperation
that extends the limits of a single workplace and is aimed at the development of
whole business branches. The motivation is to secure job opportunities, which after
the recent severe depression has become a top priority for the unions and which
takes place parallel to the traditional interest-based bargaining, albeit as an
unofficial strategy.
Alasoini, T.
(1997) ‘The Finnish National Workplace
Development Programme: Background, Starting Premises and Initial
Experience’, pp. 53–71 in
T. Alasoini
,
M. Kyllonen
, and
A. Kasvio
(eds) Workplace Innovations: National Workplace Development Programme,
Yearbook 1997.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour
.
2.
Arrighi, G.
(1994) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the
Origins of Our Times.
London: Verso
.
3.
Blumer, H.
(1986) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
4.
Buhanist, P.
,
A. Kasvio
,
T. Kauppinen
and
M. Lahtonen
(1994) ‘Finnish Action
Research’, pp. 15–41 in
T. Kauppinen
and
M. Lahtonen
(eds) Action Research in Finland: Active Society with Action Research
25–27 August 1993, Helsinki, 82 Labour Policy Studies.
Helsinki: Ministry of Finland
.
5.
Cohen-Rosenthal, E.
and
C.E. Burton
(1987) Mutual Gains: A Guide to Union–Management
Cooperation.
New York: Praeger
.
6.
Cutcher-Gerschenfeld, J.E.
,
T. Kochan
and
J.C. Wells
(2001)
‘In Whose Interest? A First Look at National Survey Data on
Interests-Based Bargaining in Labor Relations’
, Industrial Relations40(1):
1–21
.
7.
Dølvik, J.E.
(2000) ‘Norwegian Trade Unionism between
Traditionalism and Modernisation’, pp.
417–449 in
J. Waddington
and
R. Hoffmann
(eds) Trade Unions in Europe: Facing Challenges and Searching for
Solutions.
Brussels: ETUI
.
8.
European Foundation for Living and Working Conditions
(2002)
‘Enlargement and Collective Bargaining Coverage’
, Communiqué6:
6-6
.
9.
Frege, C.M.
and
J. Kelly
(2003)
‘Union Revitalization Strategies in Comparative Perspective’
, European Journal of Industrial Relations9(1):
7–24
.
10.
Gray, G.R.
,
D.W. Myers
and
P.S. Myers
(1999)
‘Cooperative Provision in Labor Agreements: A New Paradigm?’
, Monthly Labor Review122(1):
29–45
.
11.
Hodson, R.
(2002)
‘Worker Participation and Teams: New Evidence from Analyzing
Organizational Ethnographies’
, Economic and Industrial Democracy23(4):
491–528
.
12.
Jørgensen, H.
(2002) ‘From Deregulation to Co-Regulation:
Neo-Corporatism and its Contribution to a Theory of Coordinated Labor Market
Regulation’, pp. 208–222 in
T. Hanami
(ed.) Universal Wisdom Through Globalization, Selected Papers from 12th
IIRA World Congress, Tokyo.
Tokyo: Japan Institute for Labour
.
13.
Kalliola, S.
(2002) ‘A New Challenge for Trade Unions: The
Cooperational Modernization of Municipal Services in
Finland’, pp. 160–169 in
T. Hanami
(ed.) Universal Wisdom Through Globalization: Selected Papers from 12th
IIRA World Congress, Tokyo.
Tokyo: Japan Institute for Labour
.
14.
Kauppinen, T.
(1994) ‘Management of Change and the JOY
Project’, pp. 155–183 in
T. Kauppinen
and
M. Lahtonen
(eds) Action Research in Finland, Active Society with Action Research,
Labour Policy Studies 82.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour
.
15.
Kauppinen, T.
and
J. Waddington
(2000) ‘Adapting to
Decentralisation’, pp. 183–214 in
J. Waddington
and
R. Hoffmann
(eds) Trade Unions in Europe: Facing Challenges and Searching for
Solutions.
Brussels: ETUI
.
16.
Kiander, J.
(2002) ‘The Finnish Macroeconomic Policy of
Performance in 1995–2000’, in Impacts of the
EES: National Evaluation of the Effects of the European Employment Strategy in
Finland, Final Report.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour
.
17.
Kramer, J.K.
and
T. Hyclak
(2002)
‘Why Strikes Occur: Evidence from the Capital Market’
, Industrial Relations41(1):
80–93
.
18.
Ministry of Labour
(2002) Impacts of the EES: National Evaluation of the Effects
of the European Employment Strategy in Finland, Final Report.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour
.
19.
Miller, D.
,
B. Tully
and
I. Fitzgerald
(2000)
‘The Politics of Language and European Works Councils: Towards a
Research Agenda’
, European Journal of Industrial Relations6(3):
303–323
.
20.
Roche, W.K.
(2000)
‘The End of New Industrial Relations?’
, European Journal of Industrial Relations6(3):
261–282
.
21.
Rubinstein, S.A.
(2001)
‘A Different Kind of Union: Balancing Co-Management and Representation’
, Industrial Relations40(2):
163–203
.
22.
Sandberg, Å.
, ed. (1984) FramtidsfrÅgor pÅ
arbetsplatser. Om fackligt arbete med teknik, arbetsorganisation of produktion i
fyra fall studier [Future Issues at Workplaces: Four Case Studies on Trade
Unions’ Activities on Technology, Work Organization and
Production].
Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum
.
23.
Stokke, T.A.
and
C. Thornqvist
(2001)
‘Strikes and Collective Bargaining in the Nordic Countries’
, European Journal of Industrial Relations7(3):
245–267
.
24.
Waddington, J.
and
R. Hoffmann
(2000) ‘Trade Unions in Europe: Reform,
Organisation and Restructuring’, pp.
27–80 in
J. Waddington
and
R. Hoffmann
(eds) Trade Unions in Europe: Facing Challenges and Searching for
Solutions.
Brussels: ETUI
.
25.
Walton, R.E.
and
R.B. McKersie
(1991) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations,
2nd edn.Ithaca, NY: ILR Press
.
26.
Walton, R.E.
,
J.E. Cutcher-Gershenfeld
and
R.B. McKersie
(1994) Strategic Negotiations: A Theory of Change in
Labor–Management Relations.
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
.
