This article explores current strains within the Employment Tribunal Service (ETS) in
Britain. These should be seen as consequences of the
‘nationalization’ of employment rights; the assumption by the
state of the principal roles and costs involved in dispute resolution, displacing
joint regulation by employers and trade unions. The predominant policy response to
the escalating demand for tribunal hearings can be characterized as
‘privatization’, in that dispute resolution is capped as far as
possible at the level of the .rm and access to external adjudication is reduced.
Where external adjudication proceeds, it does so in ‘private’;
and roles are passed increasingly from public bodies and authorities to private
organizations. Speci.cally, the article examines the ACAS Arbitration Scheme, the
growth of privately provided alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and the provisions
of the Employment Act 2002. Their likely consequences for the accessibility,
formality, speed and expense of justice are considered.
ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service)
(2003) Annual Report and Accounts 2002-3.
London, ACAS
.
2.
ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service)
(n.d.) The ACAS Arbitration Scheme for the Resolution of Unfair
Dismissal Disputes: A Guide to the Scheme.
London, ACAS
.
3.
Allen, T.
(2004) ‘Dunnett Lives On: First Thoughts on Halsey
v Milton Keynes Trust’, May.
London: CEDR
; at: www.cedr.co.uk/php?location=/library/articles/Dunnett_lives_on
4.
Baker, A.
(2002)
‘Access v Process in Employment Discrimination: Why ADR Suits the
USA but not the UK’
, Industrial Law Journal31(2):
113-134
.
5.
Brown, W.
,
S. Deakin
,
D. Nash
and
S. Oxenbridge
(2000)
‘The Employment Contract: From Collective Procedures to
Individual Rights’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations38(4):
611-629
.
6.
Burkitt, N.
(2001) Workers’ Rights and Wrongs.
London: Institute for Public Policy Research
.
7.
CEDR (Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution)
(2004) ‘CEDR Unveils New Employment
Initiative’, 22 January; at: cedr.co.uk/index.php?location=/new/archive
8.
CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development)
(2001) Dispute Resolution. Routes to
Resolution: Improving Dispute Resolution in Britain. CIPD Response to DTI
Consultation Paper.
London: CIPD
.
9.
Corby, S.
(1999) Resolving Employment Rights Dispute Through Mediation:
The New Zealand Experience.
London: Institute of Employment Rights
.
10.
Cully, M.
,
S. Woodland
,
A. O’Reilly
and
G. Dix
(1999) Britain at Work: As Depicted by the 1998 Workplace
Employee Relations Survey.
London: Routledge
.
11.
DTI (Department of Trade and Industry)
(1994) Resolving Employment Rights Disputes: Options for
Reform.
London: DTI
.
12.
DTI (Department of Trade and Industry)
(1998) Fairness at Work, Cmnd 3968.
London: DTI
.
13.
DTI (Department of Trade and Industry)
(2001) Routes to Resolution: Improving Dispute Resolution
in Britain. Government Response.
London: DTI
; at: www.dti.gov.uk/er/individual/etresponse4.htm (accessed 11
September 2003).
14.
DTI (Department of Trade and Industry)
(2002) Findings from the 1998 Employment Tribunal
Applications (Survey of Applicants and Employers, Employment
Relations Research Series No. 13.
London: DTI
.
15.
DTI (Department of Trade and Industry)
(2003a) Review of the Employment Relations Act 1999:
Government Response to Public Consultation, December.
London: DTI
.
16.
DTI (Department of Trade and Industry)
(2003b) Employment Act 2002: Dispute Resolution.
A Consultation on Proposals for the Introduction of Statutory Dispute
Resolution Procedures.
London: DTI
; at:www.dti.gov.UK/er/individual/dis_res_consdoc.htm (accessed
11 September 2003).
17.
Dickens, L.
(1992) ‘Anti-Discrimination Legislation:
Exploring and Explaining the Impact on Women’s
Employment’, pp. 103-147 in
W. McCarthy
(ed.) Legal Intervention in Industrial Relations: Gains and
Losses.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
18.
Dickens, L.
,
M. Jones
,
B. Weekes
, and
M. Hart
(1985) Dismissed: A Study of Unfair Dismissal and the
Industrial Tribunal System.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
19.
DRC (Disability Rights Commission)
(2004) ‘Disability Rights, Casework and Alternative
Dispute Resolution’, legal commentary; at: www.drc-gb.org/thelaw/lawdetails.asp?ip=381&title=la
20.
Donovan Commission
(1968) The Report of the Royal Commission on Trade Unions and
Employers’ Associations 1965-1968. Cmnd. 3623.
London: HMSO
.
21.
Earnshaw, J.
and
S. Hardy
(2001)
‘Assessing an Arbitral Route for Unfair Dismissal’
, Industrial Law Journal30(289); at: web.lexis-nexis.com/professional/print
(accessed 9 September 2003).
22.
Earnshaw, J.
,
J. Goodman
,
R. Harrison
, and
M. Marchington
(1998) Industrial Tribunals, Workplace Disciplinary
Procedures, and Employment Practice, Employment Relations Research
Series.
London: DTI
.
23.
Edwards, P.K.
(2000) ‘Discipline: Towards Trust and
Self-Discipline?’, pp. 317-340 in
S. Bach
and
K. Sisson
(eds) Personnel Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and
Practice.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
Kelly, E.
(2001)
‘Resolving Non-Union Employment Disputes’
, National Forum81(4):
4-5
.
29.
Knight, K
, and
P. Latreille
(2000)
‘Discipline, Dismissals and Complaints to Employment Tribunals’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations38(4):
533-556
.
30.
Leggatt, A.
(2001) ‘Tribunals for Users: One System, One
Service’, Report of the Review of Tribunals.
London: Lord Chancellor’s Department
.
31.
Lewis, R.
and
J. Clark
(2000)
‘Arbitration in Dismissal Disputes: The ACAS Scheme’
, paper presented to the Industrial Law Society Annual Conference.
32.
McCarthy, W.
(1992) ‘The Rise and Fall of Collective Laissez
Faire’, pp. 1-79 in
W. McCarthy
(ed.) Legal Intervention in Industrial Relations: Gains and
Losses.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
33.
Mackie, K.
and
E. Carroll
(2003) ‘Regulation or Positive Promotion? How to
Foster the Art of Mediation’, Centre for Effective
Dispute Resolution, March.
34.
MacMillan, J.K.
(1999)
‘Employment Tribunals: Philosophies and Practicalities’
, Industrial Law Journal28(1):
33-56
.
35.
Meager, N.
,
C. Tyers
,
S, Perryman
,
J. Rick
, and
R. Willison
(2002) Awareness, Knowledge, and Exercise of Individual
Employment Rights, Employment Relations Research Series
No.15.
London: DTI
.
36.
NACAB (National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux)
(n.d.) Routes to Resolution - Improving Employment Dispute Resolution:
The Citizens Advice Bureaux Service’s Response; at:
www.nacab.org.uk/polfull.ihtml?table=legl&id=0000108 (accessed 4
December 2002).
37.
Neal, A.
(2001)
‘Recent Developments in Unfair Dismissal’
, New Law Journal 7 December. 151.7011.
38.
Nicolai, P.
(2002)
‘Rethinking Employment Law Strategies’
, Dispute Resolution Journal January.
39.
Novitz, T.
(2002)
‘A Revised Role for Trade Unions as Designed by New Labour: The
Representation Pyramid and
‘‘Partnership’’ ’
, Journal of Law and Society29(3):
487-509
.
40.
Novitz, T.
and
P. Skidmore
(2001) Fairness at Work: A Critical Analysis of the
Employment Relations Act 1999 and its Treatment of Collective Rights.
Oxford: Hart
.
41.
Rideout, R.
(1999)
‘Alternative Employment Remedies: The ACAS Arbitration Scheme’
, Federation News49(2):
54-69
.
42.
Singh, R.
(1995)
‘Dispute Resolution in Britain: Contemporary Trends’
, International Journal of Manpower16(9):
42-52
.
43.
Smith, P.
and
G. Morton
(1993)
‘Union Exclusion and the Decollectivisation of Industrial
Relations in Contemporary Britain’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations31(1):
97-114
.
44.
Smith, P
, and
G. Morton
(2001)
‘New Labour’s Reform of Britain’s Employment
Law: The Devil is Not Only in the Detail but in the Values and Policy Too’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations39(1):
119-138
.
45.
Taylor, C.
(2002)
‘Lawyers Spurn ACAS Service’
, People Management8(3):
9-9
.
46.
TUC (Trades Union Congress)
(2003) ‘Tribunal Changes Could Cause a
‘‘Barrage’’ of Union-Backed
Claims’, press release, 2 May; at: www.tuc.org.uk/em_research/tuc-6613-f0.cfm
47.
Undy, R.
(1999)
‘New Labour’s Industrial Relations Settlement: The
Third Way?’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations37:
315-315
.
48.
Wedderburn, B.
(1986) The Worker and the Law, 3rd edn.Harmondsworth: Penguin
.
49.
Lord Wedderburn
(2000)
‘Collective Bargaining or Legal Enactment? The 1999 Act and Union Recognition’
, Industrial Law Journal29(1):
1-42
.
50.
Wood, J.
(1992) ‘Dispute Resolution - Conciliation,
Mediation and Arbitration’, pp. 241-271
in
W. McCarthy
(ed.) Legal Intervention in Industrial Relations: Gains and
Losses.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
