This article explores the development of partnership-based approaches to industrial relations at the British workplace. Drawing empirically from a unique data set of Manufacturing, Science and Finance Union (MSF) workplace representatives and a workplace case study, the article explores the attitudes and experiences of trade unionists to partnership and assesses the level of support and voice mechanisms open to them in furthering the partnership agenda. The study shows that while MSF representatives appear open to the responsibilities placed upon them in the rhetoric of partnership, there is little evidence to suggest that management has reciprocated.
Arrowsmith, J.
and K. Sisson (1999) 'Pay and Working Time: Towards Organization-Based Systems?, British Journal of Industrial Relations37(1): 51-75.
2.
Ackers, P.
and J. Payne (1998) 'British Trade Unions and Social Partnership: Rhetoric, Reality and Strategy'. International Journal of Human Resource Management9(3): 529-550.
3.
Bacon, N.
and P. Blyton (1999) 'Co-Operation and Conflict in Industrial Relations: What Are the Implications for Employees and Trade Unions?', International Journal of Human Resource Management10(4): 638-654.
4.
Benkhoff, B.
(1997) 'Beware of Single Respondents: Signs of Self Serving Bias and Use Schemata in WIRS', paper presented at the British Universities Industrial Relations Association Annual Conference, University of Bath, July.
5.
Cully, M.
, S. Woodland, A. O'Reilly and G. Dix(1999) Britain at Work: As Depicted hrv the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survive. London: Routledge.
6.
Driver, S.
and L. Martell(1998) Newt Labour Politics after Thatcherism. Oxford: Polity Press.
7.
European Commission
(1997) Partnership for a New Organisation Of Work. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.
8.
Ferner, A.
and R. Hyman (eds) (1997) Changing Industrial Relations in Erope, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Giddens, A.
(1998) The Third War. Oxford: Polity Press.
10.
Giddens, A.
(2000) The Third Wari and its Critics. Oxford: Polity Press.
11.
Higgins, S.H.
(1996) 'Towards Taming the Labor-Management Frontier: A Strategic Marketing Framework', Journal of Business Ethics15: 475-485.
12.
Hirschman, A.
(1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Hyman, R.
(2001) 'The Problems of Partnership and Dilemmas of Dialogue', pp. 39-59 in C. Kjaergarrd and S. Westphalen (eds) From Collective Bargaining to Social Partnership: New Roles of the Social Partners in Europe. Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Centre.
14.
IPA (Involvement and Participation Association)
(1997) Towards Industrial Partnership. London: IPA.
15.
Kelly, J.
(1996) 'Union Militancy and Social Partnership', pp. 77-109 in P. Ackers, C. Smith and P. Smith (eds) The Next Workplace andl Trade Unionism. London: Routledge.
16.
Kochan, T.A.
(1985) 'Is a New Industrial Relations System Emerging?', pp. 339-345 in T.A. Kochan (ed.) Challenges and Choices Facing American Labour. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17.
Kochan, T.A.
and P. Osterman(1994) The Mlutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership among Labour, Management and Government. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Kochan T.C.
, H.C. Katz and R.B. McKersie(1986) The Transformation of American Industrial Relaitions. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Leisink, P.
(1993) 'Is Innovation a Management Prerogative'? Changing Employment Relationships, Innovative Unions', Leverhulme Public Lecture, University of Warwick.
20.
Marchington, M.
and A. Wilkinson (2000) 'Direct Participation', pp. 340-364 in S. Bach and K. Sisson (eds) Personnel Management. Oxford: Blackwell
21.
Marks, A.
, P. Findlay, J. Hine, A. McKinlay and P. Thompson (1998) 'The Politics of Partnership? Innovation in Employment Relations in the Scottish Spirits Industry'. British Journal of Inidustrial Relations36(2): 206-226.
22.
Martinez Lucio, M.
and M. Stuart (2000) 'Swimming against the Tide: Social Partnership, Mutual Gains and the Revival of "Tired" HRM', Centre for Industrial Relations and HRM Working Paper 00/03, University of Leeds.
23.
Martinez Lucio, M.
and S. Weston (1992) 'Human Resource Management and Trade Union Responses: Bringing the Politics of the Workplace Back into the Debate, pp. 215-232 in P. Blyton and P. Turnbull (eds) Reassessinig Human Resources Management. London: Sage.
24.
Saunders, M.
, P. Lewis and A. Thornhill(2000) Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
25.
Smith, J.
(1997) 'The Ideology of "Family and Community": New Labout Abandons the Welfare State', pp. 176-196 in L. Panitch (ed.) Socialist Resister 1997. London: Merlin Press.
26.
Stuart, M.
(1996) 'The Industrial Relations of Training: A Reconsideration of traning Arrangements', Industrial Relations Journal27(3): 253-266.
27.
Stuart, M.
and M. Martinez Lucio (2000) 'Renewing the Model Employer: Changing Employment Relations and "Partnership" in the Health and Private Sectols. Journal of Managenment in Medicle15(5/6): 310-325.
28.
Taylor, P.
and H. Ramsay (1998) 'Unions, Partnership and HRM: Sleeping with the Enemy?', International Journal of Employment Studies6(2): 115-143.
29.
Towers, B.
(1997) The Representation Gap: Change and Reform in the British and American Workplace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
TUC (Trades Union Congress)
(1999) Partners for progress. Lonldon: TUC.
31.
Turner, L.
(ed.) (1997) Negotiating the Germany: Can Social Partnership Survive?New York: Cornell University Press.
