This study investigates the combined effect of humidity control and simulated natural airflow on human thermal comfort in indoor thermal environments. A custom-built device was developed to simulate natural wind while controlling spray volume under varying ambient temperatures (27°C–30°C) and relative humidity levels (40–60%). 12 participants were subjected to 24 experimental conditions, and their thermal comfort and airflow preferences were evaluated using structured questionnaires. The results indicated that when the temperature exceeded 28°C and humidity reached 60%, increasing airflow had a more significant impact on comfort than adjusting spray volume. Conversely, at temperatures below 28°C, adjusting spray volume significantly enhanced comfort. These findings provide insights into optimizing indoor climate control systems, offering practical applications for reducing energy consumption while maintaining occupant comfort.
Practical Application
By exploring the combined effects of temperature, humidity, and airflow on thermal comfort, new insights can be provided for optimizing indoor climate control systems. The findings from this study have practical implications for designing energy-efficient cooling systems that prioritize occupant comfort, especially in regions with warm and humid climates.
XiaYZZhaoRYJiangY. Study on thermal comfort of residential environment in Beijing. J HV&AC1999; 29(2): 1–5.
2.
MansouriAWeiWAlessandriniJM, et al.Impact of climate change on indoor air quality: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19(23): 15616.
3.
MahdaviAKumarS. Implications of indoor climate control for comfort, energy and environment. Energy Build1996; 24(3): 167–177.
4.
OuyangJGeJHokaoK. Economic analysis of energy-saving renovation measures for urban existing residential buildings in China based on thermal simulation and site investigation. Energy Policy2009; 37(1): 140–149.
5.
AmasyaliKEl-GoharyNM. A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018; 81: 1192–1205.
6.
YuanXChenZLiangY, et al.Heating energy-saving potentials in HVAC system of swimming halls: a review. Build Environ2021; 205: 108189.
7.
SpandagosCNgTL. Equivalent full-load hours for assessing climate change impact on building cooling and heating energy consumption in large Asian cities. Appl Energy2017; 189: 352–368.
8.
ZhengKIchinoseMWongNH. Parametric study on the cooling effects from dry mists in a controlled environment. Build Environ2018; 141: 61–70.
9.
NicolJFHumphreysMA. Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy Build2002; 34(6): 563–572.
CaoSMingPZhaoX. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of human thermal comfort in simulating natural wind environment. Build Environ2021; 188: 107447.
12.
UchiyamaSSuzukiKTsujimotoS, et al. An experiment in reducing temperatures at a rail platform. Japan Soc Plumb Eng2008; 25(2): 34–40.
13.
ZhuSLiWDongJ. Progress in the study of natural wind simulation for indoor air conditioning equipment comfort. For Mach Woodwork Equip2004; 32(4): 7–10.
14.
YangZChenLAYangC, et al.Portable ultrasonic humidifier exacerbates indoor bioaerosol risks by raising bacterial concentrations and fueling pathogenic genera. Indoor Air2022; 32(1): e12964.
15.
CuiYMengXHuY. Study on the evaporation efficiency of pure water droplets in spray cooling system. Chin J Refrig Tec2023; 43(6): 8–13.
16.
SinghMOokaRRijalHB, et al.Adaptive thermal comfort in the offices of North-East India in autumn season. Build Environ2017; 124: 14–30.
17.
OhWOokaRNakanoJ, et al.Evaluation of mist-spraying environment on thermal sensations, thermal environment, and skin temperature under different operation modes. Build Environ2020; 168: 106484.
18.
MengXYaoRLiuQ. Study on the influence of spray air supply system on thermal environment and human thermal response. J Safety Environ2023; 23(03): 819–825.
19.
HuaJ. Application research of simulating natural wind. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2012.
20.
GB50736-2016. Design code for heating ventilation and air conditioning of civil buildings.
21.
RohlesFHKonzSAJonesBW. Ceiling fans as extenders of the summer comfort envelope. ASHRAE J1983; 14(3): 133–141.
22.
McIntyreDA. Man's thermal sensitivity during temperature changes at two levels of clothing insulation and activity. Build Eng1976; 82(2): 219–233.
23.
KumarNKubotaTBardhanR, et al.CFD analysis of airflow in voids for better cross ventilation in midrise buildings in hot and humid climates. Build Simul2019; 16: 3879–3885.
24.
HuiboLJingWYanheW. Fuzzy adaptive PID control of brushless DC motors. Control Eng2014; 4: 583–587.
25.
KonSARohlesFH. Airflow and comfort in office buildings. ASHRAE J1983; 14(2): 233–240.
26.
MengYMouDCaoB, et al.Evaluation of actual thermal environment in free-running office building in mild zone. Build Energy Eff2020; 48(6): 27–32.
27.
XuTLiuGKangS, et al. Experimental study on human thermal comfort in dynamic thermal environment. Build Therm Energy Vent Air Cond2010; 29(2): 62–66.
28.
DeDRJBragerGS. Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE standard 55. Energy Build2002; 34(6): 549–561.
29.
CaoSZhaoWZhuA. Research on intervention PID control of VAV terminal based on LabVIEW. Case Stud Therm Eng2023; 45: 103002.
30.
FangerPOThermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, 1970.
31.
ZhangYZhengZZhangS, et al.Exploring thermal comfort and pleasure in outdoor shaded spaces: inspiration for improving thermal index models. Build Environ2024; 265: 111933.
32.
YuJYangYLuoM, et al. Experimental study on the impact of non-isothermal perceptible air conditioning on human thermal comfort. J HV&AC2015; 45(4): 116–119.
33.
ISO 7730. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2005.
34.
ASHRAE 55. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Georgia: ASHRAE Handbook, 2020.
35.
ZhuY. Architectural environment. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010.
36.
WatanabeHSugiTSaitoK, et al.Mechanism underlying the influence of humidity on thermal comfort and stress under mimicked working conditions. Physiol Behav2024; 285: 114653.
37.
DjamilaHChuCMKumaresanS. Effect of humidity on thermal comfort in the humid tropics. J Build Constr plan Res2014; 02(02): 109–117.
38.
VelleiMHerreraMFosasD, et al.The influence of relative humidity on adaptive thermal comfort. Build Environ2017; 124: 171–185.
39.
FarnhamCNakaoMNishiokaM, et al.Study of mist-cooling for semi-enclosed spaces in Osaka, Japan. Procedia Environ Sci2011; 4: 228–238.
40.
HuangCYeDZhaoH, et al.The research and application of spray cooling technology in Shanghai Expo. Appl Therm Eng2011; 31(17-18): 3726–3735.
41.
FarnhamCZhangLYuanJ, et al.Measurement of the evaporative cooling effect: oscillating misting fan. Build Res Inf2017; 45(7): 783–799.
42.
WongNHChongAZM. Performance evaluation of misting fans in hot and humid climate. Build Environ2010; 45(12): 2666–2678.
43.
SchweikerMShukuyaM. Comparative effects of building envelope improvements and occupant behavioral changes on the exergy consumption for heating and cooling. Energy Policy2009; 37(1): 505–513.
44.
SeppänenOAFiskW. Some quantitative relations between indoor environmental quality and work performance or health. HVAC R Res2006; 12(4): 957–973.
