Drainage and sewage system performance – Consequences of reductions in toilet flush volume

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate impacts of reducing toilet flush volume from 6.8 to 4.8 Lpf with laboratory and field studies. In laboratory, 260 tests were performed including water consumption, waste removal and solid transport tests, in 20 different toilets produced by national and international manufacturers. These tests demonstrated that a simple reduction in flush tank water level was not a viable solution for reducing flush volume, due to flush energy loss. Toilets are designed to work with certain water volume, and reducing this volume without studying the consequences that this could cause, can make with the toilet fail. Toilets approved according the standards ABNT NBR15097, ABNT NBR15491 and ASMEA112.19.2 were installed in 10 houses. The monitoring of water consumption and sewage system videos were conducted during eight months. When 6.8-Lpf toilets were installed, the average toilet water consumption was 16.6L/inhabitant/day. For 4.8-Lpf toilets, this value increased to 17.6. The number of flushes/person/day increased after toilets replacement, indicating that users applied successive flushes. Videos showed blockages in sewage system horizontal pipes. Findings from this study suggest that low-flush toilets do not decrease total water use, and may result in increased water use. In addition, they can cause clogging and solid deposit on sewage system.

Practical application: Many management failures have affected the world water availability. Water demand has increased with population growth, and unless the equilibrium between water demand and supply is restored, the world will face increasing water shortage. However, it is essential to study the way of reducing water consumption. Without an effective analysis, instead of bringing benefits to population, water consumption reduction can lead to clogging and negative consequences on sewage system performance, causing disorder to them. It is recommended that manufacturers did not reduce the toilet water consumption without a study on the impact caused on the sewage systems, as well as designers should be careful when specifying sanitary appliances.

Keywords

4.8-Lpf toilet water supply system drainage system sewage system water conservation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ghisi

Oliveira

. Potential for potable water savings by combining the use of rainwater and greywater in houses in southern Brazil. Build Environ 2007; 42: 1731–1742.

Barreto

. Profile of residential consumption and end uses of water. Ambiente Construído, Porto Alegre 2008; 8: 23–40.

Akiyama K, Otsuka M and Shigefuji H. A study on a method of predicting the discharge characteristics of water saving toilets when installed to the fixture drain. In: 39th International symposium CIB W062 on water supply and drainage for buildings, Nagano, Japão. Water Supply and Drainage for Buildings. Nagano: The International Council for Research and Innovation, Commission CIB W062, 2013, pp.185-196.

de Oliveira Júnior, OB. Functional performance assessment of toilets volume reduced discharge with respect to the removal and transport of solids. Thesis, Estadual University of Campinas, Campinas, 2002.

Associação Brasileira De Normas Técnicas. NBR 15097-1: Ceramic sanitary fixtures Part 1: Requirements and test methods. São Paulo: ABNT, 2017, 63 p.

Valencio IP and Goncalves OM. Field evaluation of water consumption and drainage system performance when 6.8Lpf toilets were replaced by 4.8Lpf toilets. In: 43^rd International symposium CIBW062 on water supply and drainage for buildings, 2017, Haarlem, The Netherlands, 24-26 August 2017, 16 p.

Cheng CL, et al. Simulation of solid transportation and regulation for main drain system in Taiwan. In: 37th International symposium CIB W062 on water supply and drainage for buildings, Aveiro, Portugal, 25-27 September 2011.

Mcdougall

Swafield

Campbell

. Drainage flow and solid transport simulation in defective building drainage networks. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 1999; 20: 73–81.

Mcdougall

Swafield

. Simulation of building drainage system operation under water conservation design criteria. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 2000; 21: 41–52.

10.

Mcdougall

Swafield

. The influence of water conservation on drain sizing for building drainage systems. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 2003; 24: 229–243.

11.

Mcdougall

Wakelin

RHM

. The influence of flush volume and branch drain cross-section on deformable solid transport in attenuating flows. Build Serv Eng Res Technol Edinburgh 2007; 28: 7–22.

12.

Gauley

Koeller

. Evaluation of low-flush-volume toilet technologies to carry waste in drainlines: a Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Project, Mississauga: Yorba Linda: Gauley And Koeller, 2005. , 39 p.

13.

PERC. The drainline transport of solid waste in buildings. Plumbing Efficiency Research Coalition (PERC), 2012, Phase 1, http://www.plumbingefficiencyresearchcoalition.org/projects/drainline-transport-of-solid-waste-in-buildings (accessed 20 December 2018).

14.

PERC. The drainline transport of solid waste in buildings – phase 2.0. Plumbing Efficiency Research Coalition (PERC), 2015, Phase 2.0, http://www.plumbingefficiencyresearchcoalition.org/projects/drainline-transport-of-solid-waste-in-buildings (accessed 20 December 2018).

15.

AWE. The impacts of high efficiency toilets on plumbing drainlines and sewers. Alliance for water efficiency. 2011, http://www.allianceforwaterefficiency.org/toilet_fixtures.aspx (accessed 20 December 2018).

16.

EA. Using science to create a better place. less water to waste – impact of reduction in water demand on wastewater collection and treatment systems. Bristol: Environmental Agency. 2008, p. 81.

17.

Kobayashi N and e Otsuka M. A study on evaluation of a super water-saving toilet in regard to the drainage performance thereof in the house drain section. In: 38th International symposium CIBW062 on water supply and drainage for buildings, Edinburgh, Scotland, 27-30 August 2012.

18.

Associação Brasileira De Normas Técnicas. NBR 15491: Water closet flush tank – requirements and test methods, São Paulo: ABNT, 2010. , 40 p.

19.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers. A112.19.2: Ceramic plumbing fixtures. Nova IorqueASME, 86 p.