An enhanced operation model for energy storage system of a typical combined cool,heat and power based on demand response program: The application of mixed integer linear programming
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2019
An enhanced operation model for energy storage system of a typical combined cool,heat and power based on demand response program: The application of mixed integer linear programming
A model for operating an energy hub-based multiple energy generation micro-grid is optimized using the demand response program. The optimized objective model is validated against energy demand of a residential building in Tehran, Iran. The mathematical model and optimal analysis of the proposed tri-generation micro-grid are implemented by using a real-world modelling and considering the constraints of the storage system, demand response program and the performance of the devices and the power and gas grids. The dynamic optimal operation model is prepared on the basis of the mixed integer linear programming on the subsequent day and is solved to minimize the costs of energy supply. To demonstrate the improvements, different scenarios are developed so that the renewable energy resources and storages are fed into the combined cool, heat and power system gradually. The results reveal that the inclusion of each element results in a significant improvement in the operational parameters of the micro energy grid. Scenario 1 includes a combined cool, heat and power system alone, Scenario 2 is supplemented with renewable wind and solar energy resources in addition to combined cool, heat and power system and Scenario 3 includes electrical, heat and cold storages in addition to combined cool, heat and power system and renewable energy sources. Scenario 4 is similar to Scenario 3 in terms of equipment, but the only difference lies in the use of the demand response program in the former. Total operational cost is 12.7% lower in Scenario 2 than in Scenario 1, 9.2% lower in Scenario 3 than in Scenario 2 and 8.6% lower in Scenario 4 than in Scenario 3.
Practical application: An optimized operation method is prepared for combined cool, heat and power systems running in different operation modes in which renewable energy sources and storages are added to the combined cool, heat and power and the demand response program is applied. The results reveal that the cost of energy supply, including the cost of electricity, gas and pollutant emissions, is reduced and the qualitative parameters of the operation, including efficiency and reliability of building micro-grid, are increased. The proposed algorithm and the evaluation method will enable building operators to plan demand response activity on the residential building in Tehran, while this can be extended to other buildings too.
MalekiARosenMAPourfayazF. Optimal operation of a grid-connected hybrid renewable energy system for residential applications. Sustainability2017; 9: 1314–1314.
2.
DuićNRosenMA. Sustainable development of energy systems. Energ Convers Manag2014; 87: 1057–1062.
3.
ChenXGongGWanZet al.Performance study of a dual power source residential CCHP system based on PEMFC and PTSC. Energ Convers Manag2016; 119: 163–176.
4.
LiCZShiYMHuangXH. Sensitivity analysis of energy demands on performance of CCHP system. Energ Convers Manag2008; 49: 3491–3497.
5.
KrauseTAnderssonGFrohlichKet al.Multiple-energy carriers: modeling of production, delivery, and consumption. Proc IEEE2011; 99: 15–27.
6.
MancarellaP. MES (multi-energy systems): an overview of concepts and evaluation models. Energy2014; 65: 1–17.
7.
Rifkin J. The third industrial revolution: how lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. New York: Macmillan, 2011, pp.42–85.
8.
QuelhasAGilEMcCalleyJDet al.A multiperiod generalized network flow model of the US integrated energy system: part I – model description. IEEE Trans Power Syst2007; 22: 829–836.
9.
GeidlMKoeppelGFavre-PerrodPet al.Energy hubs for the future. IEEE Power Energ Mag2007; 5: 24–30.
10.
Geidl M and Andersson G. Optimal coupling of energy infrastructures. In: Power Tech, 2007 IEEE, Lausanne. IEEE, 2007, pp.1398–1403.
11.
BahramiSSafeF. A financial approach to evaluate an optimized combined cooling, heat and power system. Energ Power Eng2013; 5: 352–352.
12.
RastegarMFotuhi-FiruzabadM. Load management in a residential energy hub with renewable distributed energy resources. Energ Build2015; 107: 234–242.
13.
BozchaluiMCHashmiSAHassenHet al.Optimal operation of residential energy hubs in smart grids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid2012; 3: 1755–1766.
14.
Moeini-AghtaieMAbbaspourAFotuhi-FiruzabadMet al.Optimized probabilistic PHEVs demand management in the context of energy hubs. IEEE Trans Power Deliv2015; 30: 996–1006.
15.
RastegarMFotuhi-FiruzabadMLehtonenM. Home load management in a residential energy hub. Elec Power Syst Res2015; 119: 322–8.
16.
LeMHPloixS. Sensibility and uncertainties analysis method dedicated to home energy management problem. Build Serv Eng Res Tech2018; 39: 50–65.
17.
WangALiuJWangW. Flexibility-based improved model of multi-energy hubs using linear weighted sum algorithm. J Renew Sustain Energ2018; 10: 015901–015901.
18.
ArandianBArdehaliM. Renewable photovoltaic-thermal combined heat and power allocation optimization in radial and meshed integrated heat and electricity distribution networks with storages based on newly developed hybrid shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J Renew Sustain Energ2017; 9: 033503–033503.
19.
KakranSChananaS. An energy scheduling method for multiple users of residential community connected to the grid and wind energy source. Build Serv Eng Res Tech2018; 39: 295–309.
20.
ShengWPengSTangYet al.Stochastic multi-objective scheduling of a combined cooling, heating and power microgrid containing a fuel cell. J Renew Sustain Energ2015; 7: 063123–063123.
21.
TekeAZorKTimurO. A simple methodology for capacity sizing of cogeneration and trigeneration plants in hospitals: a case study for a university hospital. J Renew Sustain Energ2015; 7: 053102–053102.
22.
ParvizimosaedMFarmaniFAnvari-MoghaddamA. Optimal energy management of a micro-grid with renewable energy resources and demand response. J Renew Sustain Energ2013; 5: 053148–053148.
23.
GuWTangYPengSet al.Optimal configuration and analysis of combined cooling, heating, and power microgrid with thermal storage tank under uncertainty. J Renew Sustain Energ2015; 7: 013104–013104.
24.
El-ZonkolyAMAbdelazizAYEladlAM. Double-layer firefly algorithm for simultaneous optimal sizing and operation of energy hubs. Elec Power Compon Syst2017; 45(16): 1846–1857.
25.
XiangYLiuJLiFet al.Optimal active distribution network planning: a review. Elec Power Compon Syst2016; 44: 1075–1094.
26.
WangSFanXHanLet al.Improved interval optimization method based on differential evolution for microgrid economic dispatch. Elec Power Compon Syst2015; 43: 1882–1890.
27.
FuQNasiriASolankiAet al.Microgrids: architectures, controls, protection, and demonstration. Elec Power Compon Syst2015; 43: 1453–1465.
28.
ShenJJiangCLiuYet al.A microgrid energy management system with demand response for providing grid peak shaving. Elec Power Compon Syst2016; 44: 843–852.
29.
KaramiHSanjariMTavakoliAet al.Optimal scheduling of residential energy system including combined heat and power system and storage device. Elec Power Compon Syst2013; 41: 765–781.
30.
HitchinR. A framework for building-related carbon coefficients and primary energy factors for networked electricity supplies. Build Serv Eng Res Tech2018; 39: 492–500.
31.
MarzbandMJavadiMPourmousaviSAet al.An advanced retail electricity market for active distribution systems and home microgrid interoperability based on game theory. Elec Power Syst Res2018; 157: 187–99.
32.
IndragantiMBoussaaDAssadiSet al.User satisfaction and energy use behavior in offices in Qatar. Build Serv Eng Res Tech2018; 39: 391–405.
33.
El-ZonkolyA. Optimal scheduling of observable controlled islands in presence of energy hubs. Elec Power Syst Res2017; 142: 141–152.
34.
MonyeiCAdewumiA. Integration of demand side and supply side energy management resources for optimal scheduling of demand response loads – South Africa in focus. Elec Power Syst Res2018; 158: 92–104.
35.
SafdarianAAliMFotuhi-FiruzabadMet al.Domestic EWH and HVAC management in smart grids: potential benefits and realization. Elec Power Syst Res2016; 134: 38–46.
36.
XiaoFAiQ. New modeling framework considering economy, uncertainty, and security for estimating the dynamic interchange capability of multi-microgrids. Elec Power Syst Res2017; 152: 237–248.
37.
BakirtzisEASimoglouCKBiskasPNet al.Storage management by rolling stochastic unit commitment for high renewable energy penetration. Elec Power Syst Res2018; 158: 240–249.
38.
ChenYLuoYYangH. An optimization method for design and operation of combined cooling, heating, and power systems toward a smart grid. Sci Tech Built Environ2016; 22: 766–782.
39.
JenkinsD. Integrating building modelling with future energy systems. Build Serv Eng Res Tech2018; 39: 135–146.
40.
NojavanSAllahAH. Stochastic energy procurement of large electricity consumer considering photovoltaic, wind-turbine, micro-turbines, energy storage system in the presence of demand response program. Energ Convers Manag2015; 103: 1008–1018.
41.
EvansBSidatS. The use of temporal factors for improved CO2 emissions accounting in buildings. Build Serv Eng Res Tech2018; 39: 196–210.
42.
MilcarekRJAhnJZhangJ. Review and analysis of fuel cell-based, micro-cogeneration for residential applications: current state and future opportunities. Sci Tech Built Environ2017; 23: 1224–1243.
43.
ElsiedMOukaourAGualousHet al.Optimal economic and environment operation of micro-grid power systems. Energ Convers Manag2016; 122: 182–194.
44.
NeyestaniNYazdani-DamavandiMShafie-KhahMet al.Stochastic modeling of multienergy carriers dependencies in smart local networks with distributed energy resources. IEEE Trans Smart Grid2015; 6: 1748–1762.
45.
AghniaeySLawrenceTMMohammadpourJet al.Optimizing thermal comfort considerations with electrical demand response program implementation. Build Serv Eng Res Tech2018; 39: 219–231.
46.
MazidiMZakariazadehAJadidSet al.Integrated scheduling of renewable generation and demand response programs in a microgrid. Energ Convers Manag2014; 86: 1118–1127.
47.
WangSXueXYanC. Building power demand response methods toward smart grid. HVAC&R Res2014; 20: 665–687.
48.
MancarellaPChiccoG. Real-time demand response from energy shifting in distributed multi-generation. IEEE Trans Smart Grid2013; 4: 1928–1938.
49.
LowryG. Day-ahead forecasting of grid carbon intensity in support of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning plant demand response decision-making to reduce carbon emissions. Build Serv Eng Res Tech2018, pp. 014362441877473–014362441877473.
50.
SoroudiA. Power system optimization modeling in GAMS2017Switzerland: Springer, pp. 5–6.
51.
HeibatiSMAtabiF. Integrated dynamic modeling for energy optimization in the building: part 2: an application of the model to analysis of XYZ building. J Build Phys2013; 37: 153–169.
52.
ChenHJWangDWChenSL. Optimization of an ice-storage air conditioning system using dynamic programming method. Appl Therm Eng2005; 25: 461–472.
53.
LeeWSChenYTWuTH. Optimization for ice-storage air-conditioning system using particle swarm algorithm. Appl Energ2009; 86: 1589–1595.
54.
BrahmanFHonarmandMJadidS. Optimal electrical and thermal energy management of a residential energy hub, integrating demand response and energy storage system. Energ Build2015; 90: 65–75.
55.
GuoLLiuWCaiJet al.A two-stage optimal planning and design method for combined cooling, heat and power microgrid system. Energ Convers Manag2013; 74: 433–445.
56.
TanZJuLReedBet al.The optimization model for multi-type customers assisting wind power consumptive considering uncertainty and demand response based on robust stochastic theory. Energ Convers Manag2015; 105: 1070–1081.
Rosenfeld A, Herter K and Commission CE. Demand response hardware and tariffs: Californias vision and reality. ACEE Summer Study,www.energycagov/papers2004 (2004, accessed 10 July 2017).
59.
GangWWangSXiaoF. District cooling systems and individual cooling systems: comparative analysis and impacts of key factors. Sci Tech Built Environ2017; 23: 241–250.
60.
HeibatiSMAtabiFKhalajiassadiMet al.Integrated dynamic modeling for energy optimization in the building: part 1: the development of the model. J Build Phys2013; 37: 28–54.
