Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The liquid desiccant enthalpy recovery is an efficient way to save energy in air-conditioning systems. In this study, a counter-flow liquid desiccant enthalpy recovery device was proposed and experimentally analyzed. Enthalpy transfer capacity, enthalpy efficiency and pressure drop per height of packing were used as indices to describe its performances. Based on the experiment results, the heat and mass transfer model of a packed tower was used to simulate and optimize the performance of this device. The maximum enthalpy efficiency and enthalpy transfer capacity were achieved when the optimal air velocity (1.9–2.1 m/s in this study) maintained to be slightly below the air velocity at the loading point and the thermal capacity ratio of air to desiccant (m*) equaled to 1. These conclusions are valuable to both design and operation of such an enthalpy recovery device.

Practical application: A counter-flow enthalpy recovery device with liquid desiccant was proposed and experimentally investigated. Based on the experiment results, a numerical model for this device was built and validated. The optimal air and desiccant mass fluxes were analyzed to maximize the enthalpy efficiency of this device, which could be higher than the conventional device with cross-flow pattern. These results could provide guidelines for both design and operation management of counter-flow enthalpy recovery devices in liquid desiccant-based air-conditioning systems.

Keywords

Liquid desiccant enthalpy recovery counter-flow experimental analysis numerical model performance optimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Connor

Calautit

JKS

Hughes

. A review of heat recovery technology for passive ventilation applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2016; 54: 1481–1493.

Chen

Yang

Luo

. Investigation on solar assisted liquid desiccant dehumidifier and evaporative cooling system for fresh air treatment. Energy 2018; 143: 114–127.

ASHRAE. Air-to -air energy recovery equipment. In: ASHRAE handbook-HVAC systems and equipment. Atlanta: ASHRAE Inc., 2012, pp. 25.1–25.25.

Cuce

Riffat

. A comprehensive review of heat recovery systems for building applications. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2015; 47: 665–682.

Liu

. Review of the impact of liquid desiccant dehumidification on indoor air quality. Build Environ 2017; 116: 158–172.

Rafique

Gandhidasan

Bahaidarah

HMS

. Liquid desiccant materials and dehumidifiers – a review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2016; 56: 179–195.

Zhang

Liu

Jiang

. Performance investigation and exergy analysis of enthalpy recovery device using liquid desiccant. Appl Therm Eng 2016; 106: 76–86.

Liu

Jiang

. New type of fresh air processor with liquid desiccant total heat recovery. Energy Build 2005; 37: 587–593.

Liu

Jiang

. Heat and mass transfer model of cross-flow liquid desiccant air dehumidifier/regenerator. Energ Convers Manage 2007; 48: 546–554.

10.

Varela

Yamaguchi

Giannetti

et al.

General correlations for the heat and mass transfer coefficients in an air-solution contactor of a liquid desiccant system and an experimental case application. Int J Heat Mass Tranfer 2018; 120: 851–860.

11.

Chen

Zhu

Bai

. Performance assessment of a membrane liquid desiccant dehumidification cooling system based on experimental investigations. Energy Build 2017; 139: 665–679.

12.

Xie

Zhang

Liu

. Performance investigation of a counter-flow heat pump driven liquid desiccant dehumidification system. Energy 2016; 115: 446–457.

13.

Patnaik

Lenz

Gog

. Performance studies for an experimental solar open-cycle liquid desiccant air dehumidification system. Sol Energy 1990; 44: 123–135.

14.

Lazzarin

Gasparella

Longo

. Chemical dehumidification by liquid desiccants: theory and experiment. Int J Refrig 1999; 22: 334–347.

15.

Longo

Gasparella

. Experimental analysis on desiccant regeneration in a packed column with structured and random packing. Sol Energy 2009; 83: 511–521.

16.

Wang

Xiao

Zhang

et al.

An experimental study on the dehumidification performance of a counter-flow liquid desiccant dehumidifier. Int J Refrig 2016; 70: 289–301.

17.

Koronaki

Christodoulaki

Papaefthimiou

et al.

Thermodynamic analysis of a counter-flow adiabatic dehumidifier with different liquid desiccant materials. Appl Therm Eng 2013; 50: 361–373.

18.

Niu

Zhang

et al.

Performance analysis of a liquid desiccant system with an adjustable reflux ratio of regeneration solution. Build Serv Eng Res T 2016; 38: 89–103.

19.

Cai

et al.

Experimental investigations on heat and mass transfer performances of a liquid desiccant cooling and dehumidification system. Appl Energy 2018; 220: 164–175.

20.

Zhang

Liu

Wei

et al.

Experimental study and analysis of heat and mass transfer ability of counter-flow packing tower and liquid desiccant dehumidification system. Energy Build 2018; 158: 150–161.

21.

Narayan

Mistry

Sharqaway

et al.

Energy effectiveness of simultaneous heat and mass exchange devices. Frontiers Heat Mass Transf 2010; 1: 1–13.

22.

Liu

Jiang

Xia

et al.

Analytical solutions of coupled heat and mass transfer processes in liquid desiccant air dehumidifier/regenerator. Energy Convers Manage 2007; 48: 2221–2232.

23.

Al-Farayedhi

Gandhidasan

Al-Mutairi

. Evaluation of heat and mass transfer coefficients in a gauze-type structured packing air dehumidifier operating with liquid desiccant. Int J Refrigirat 2002; 25: 330–339.

24.

Chen

Zhang

Yin

. Experimental and theoretical analysis of liquid desiccant dehumidification process based on an advanced hybrid air-conditioning system. Appl Therm Eng 2015; 98: 387–399.

25.

Zakeri

Einbu

Svendsen

. Experimental investigation of pressure drop in structured packings. Chem Eng Sci 2012; 73: 285–298.

26.

Sebastia-Saez

Ranganathan

et al.

Meso-scale CFD study of the pressure drop, liquid hold-up, interfacial area and mass transfer in structured packing materials. Int J Greenh Gas Con 2015; 42: 388–399.

27.

Verschoof

Olujic

Fair

. A general correlation for predicting the loading point of corrugated sheet structured packings. Ind Eng Chem Res 1999; 38: 3663–3669.

28.

Lam

Wan

KKW

Yang

. Sensitivity analysis and energy conservation measures implications. Energ Convers Manage 2008; 49: 3170–3177.

29.

Chung

Ghosh

Hines

. Comparison between random and structured packings for dehumidification of air by lithium chloride solutions in a packed column and their heat and mass transfer correlations. Ind Eng Chem Res 1996; 35: 192–198.

Experimental analysis and performance optimization of a counter-flow enthalpy recovery device using liquid desiccant

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References