Data centre sustainability – Beyond energy efficiency

Abstract

Data centres are large energy consumers, which have become more energy efficient in recent years due to increased awareness of opportunities, increasing energy costs and corporate social responsibility pressures. A lifecycle assessment approach identifies two other significant areas of impact: the embodied impact of IT equipment and mechanical and electrical plant, and the electricity source used in operational and embodied processes. Many data centre operators publicise their energy efficiency, some also report on their carbon footprint. However, there is a need for simple tools in order to help operators better understand and quantify the embodied impact and inform green procurement. Focussing purely on energy efficiency may cause a burden shift, e.g. by replacing equipment with more efficient equipment but increasing the embodied impact. The total environmental impact could remain the same/increase, but with the perception of a ‘greener’ data centre. Although currently there is limited data available for data centre life cycle assessments and the process is resource intensive, research has identified which factors significantly impact a facility’s environmental impact. This knowledge should be used in the design process and throughout the data centre lifecycle to minimise data centre environmental impact.

Practical application : As the data centre industry continues to grow and its sustainability receives closer scrutiny, it is important to increase awareness of where its highest environment impacts lie and analyse the factors which influence this. This can help inform policy and decision-making to support the design and operation of data centres which are truly more sustainable. It is important that this research is not just theoretical but can translate into practical actions which can be implemented in a cost-effective manner for the benefit of everyone. The current focus in industry has been energy consumption and energy efficiency; many practices which were considered innovative a few years ago have now become standard best practice. It is time to examine which other areas should be prioritised for improvement.