This research is a design and assessment of a bioclimatic house wall and roof to be constructed in Thailand’s housing market in order to provide information for potential builders as well as the peace of mind of the owner. The research found that a bioclimatic house with a double-layered solar chimney is appropriate for use in Thailand throughout the year. It lowers the average internal temperature of the house by approximately 1–2℃ when compared to the energy-saving material used in a normal building. Bioclimatic construction also creates natural ventilation, heat removal, and can reduce indoor temperature. It also comes with an easy-to-build design to facilitate construction and can save house energy consumption.
Practical application: This research provides helpful information of solar chimney wall and roof for both the owners and developers in adopting an energy-efficient house for sustainable energy conservation. A solar chimney of a bioclimatic house is a highly interesting alternative for saving energy in the long term. When properly promoted, it will help save a huge amount of energy throughout Thailand and tropical area, and serve to promote the cause of global environmental conservation into the future.
OlgyayVLyndonDReynoldsJ. Design with climate: bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2015.
2.
LovellH. Supply and demand for low energy housing in the UK: insights from a science and technology studies approach. Housing Stud2005; 20: 815–829.
3.
LöfströmEPalmJ. Visualising household energy use in the interest of developing sustainable energy systems. Housing Stud2008; 23: 935–940.
4.
GoodchildBWalshawA. Towards zero carbon homes in England? From inception to partial implementation. Housing Stud2011; 26: 933–949.
5.
HuHGeertmanSHooimeijerP. Green apartments in Nanjing China: do developers and planners understand the valuation by residents?Housing Stud2014; 29: 26–43.
6.
NikoofardSUgursalVIBeausoleil-MorrisonI. Technoeconomic assessment of the impact of window improvements on the heating and cooling energy requirement and greenhouse gas emissions of the Canadian Housing Stock. J Energy Eng2014; 140: 04013018–04013018.
7.
ZhengGJingYHuangH. Multihierarchical gray evaluation method to assess building energy conservation. J Energy Eng2011; 137: 88–98.
8.
ChardeMGuptaR. Annual thermal performance of a hollow roof in combination with a cavity wall and static sunshade: experimental study of energy-efficient rooms. J Energy Eng2013; 139: 281–289.
9.
Madurwar M, Mandavgane S and Ralegaonkar R. Development and feasibility analysis of bagasse ash bricks. J Energy Eng. Epub ahead of print 23 April 2014. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000200.
10.
MoujaesSBrickmanR. Thermal performance analysis of highly reflective coating on residences in hot and arid climates. J Energy Eng2003; 129: 56–68.
11.
Wai WongJKSiu-Kit LauL. From the ‘urban heat island’ to the ‘green island’? A preliminary investigation into the potential of retrofitting green roofs in Mongkok district of Hong Kong. Habitat Int2013; 39: 25–35.
12.
ZhuJChewDLvSAS. Optimization method for building envelope design to minimize carbon emissions of building operational energy consumption using orthogonal experimental design (OED). Habitat Int2013; 37: 148–154.
13.
YitmenIAkinerIMararK. Reviewing building construction statistics in Turkey: stakeholders’ perspective. Habitat Int2012; 36: 371–379.
14.
ArcherD. Baan Mankong participatory slum upgrading in Bangkok, Thailand: community perceptions of outcomes and security of tenure. Habitat Int2012; 36: 178–184.
15.
GovenderTBarnesJMPieperCH. Housing conditions, sanitation status and associated heath risks in selected subsidized low-cost housing settlements in Cape Town, South Africa. Habitat Int2011; 35: 335–342.
16.
BredenoordJvan LindertP. Pro-poor housing policies: rethinking the potential of assisted self-help housing. Habitat Int2010; 34: 278–287.
17.
YapKSWandelerKD. Self-help housing in Bangkok. Habitat Int2010; 34: 332–341.
18.
K’AkumuOA. Reforming the national statistical system of Kenya: policy implications for the development of building construction statistics. Habitat Int2009; 34: 120–124.
19.
ZhaiXQSongZPWangRZ. A review for the applications of solar chimneys in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2011; 15: 3757–3767.
20.
KhedariJMansirisubWChaimaS. Field measurements of performance of roof solar collector. Energy Build2000; 31: 171–178.
21.
ChantawongPHirunlabhJZeghmatiB. Investigation on thermal performance of glazed solar chimney walls. Solar Energy2006; 80: 288–297.
22.
WaewsakJHirunlabhJKhedariJ. Performance evaluation of the BSRC multi-purpose bio-climatic roof. Build Environ2003; 38: 1297–1302.
23.
PunyasompunSHirunlabhJKhedariJ. Investigation on the application of solar chimney for multi-storey buildings. Renew Energy2009; 34: 2545–2561.
24.
RatanachotinunJHirunlabhJKasayapanandN. Technical and economical assessment of energy-saving roof and wall construction in Thailand. J Chinese Inst Eng2016; 39: 1–11.
25.
RatanachotinunJPairojnP. A feasibility study of glass solar chimney wall for tropical area, case study: Bangkok, Thailand. Int Energy J2014; 14: 95–106.
26.
KhedariJHirunlabhJBunnagT. Experimental study of roof solar collector towards the natural ventilation of new house. Energy Build1997; 26: 159–164.
27.
WaewsakJSarachittiRKhedariJ. Numerical modeling of thermal and daylighting performance of the Thai bioclimatic roof. East-West J Math2003; Special Volume: 71–79.
28.
HirunlabhJWachirapuwadonSPratinthongN. New configurations of roof solar collector maximizing natural ventilation. Build Environ2001; 36: 383–391.
29.
HirunlabhJKongduangWNamprakaiP. Study of natural ventilation of house by a metallic solar wall under tropical climate. Renew Energy1999; 18: 109–119.
30.
KhedariJBoonsriBHirunlabhJ. Ventilation impact of a solar chimney on indoor temperature fluctuation and air change in a school building. Energy Build2000; 32: 89–93.
31.
KhedariJLertsatitthanakornCPratinthongN. The modified trombe wall: a simple ventilation means and an efficient insulating materials. Int J Ambient Energy1998; 19: 104–110.
32.
Ratanachotinun J, Hirunlabh J, Kasayapanand N, et al. Experimental comparative analysis of solar chimney house performance with energy saving house and general house in Thailand. In: Proceedings of international building and infrastructure technology conference, 2011, pp. 205–213. Penang, Malaysia: School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
33.
KhedariJRachapraditNHirunlabhJ. Field study of performance of solar chimney with air-conditioned building. Energy2003; 28: 1099–1114.
34.
Thai Industrial Standards Institute. Building bricks (TISI. 77-2545). Thailand: Thai Industrial Standards Institute, Ministry of Industry, http://www.tisi.go.th/eng/index.php/item/2 (2003, accessed 18 July 2014).
35.
White JA, Agee MH and Case KE. Measuring the worth of investments. In: Principles of engineering economic analysis. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989, pp.161–163.
36.
Government Housing Bank. Housing markets and credit markets 2012 and trend in 2013, http://www.ghbhomecenter.com (2012, accessed 12 June 2012).
