Outdoor spaces are air volumes between buildings that are open to atmospheric air. Surrounding buildings hinder and alter airflow, which affect the exchange process and its quality. Given that this outdoor air is captured to ventilate a building’s interior, the geometric characteristics and wind exposure of these outdoor spaces are vital to optimising these processes. One of the parameters under study is the variable wind speed. The goal of this article is to ascertain whether different wind velocities affect airflow patterns in these spaces. To this end, eight archetypal shape/volumetric cases of urban buildings are examined from an air exchange efficiency perspective.
Practical application: The result is described by a mathematical expression that links the exchange efficiency with a range of wind velocities (0.75–6.00 m/s), which confirmed that this wind velocity range implies variations of only ±1.0% in interior courtyards, ±1.6% in adjacent exterior spaces between buildings, and ±2.4% in the considered control volume.
VardoulakisSFisherBEAPericleousaK. Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmosph Environ2003; 37: 155–182.
2.
YassinMF. Impact of height and shape of building roof on air quality in urban street canyons. Atmosph Environ2011; 45: 5220–5229.
3.
Padilla-Marcos MA, Feijó-Muñoz J and Meiss A. Confined-air quality based on the geometric efficiency of urban outdoor spaces. Cases study. PhD thesis, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, 2014.
4.
SkoteMSandbergMWesterbergU. Numerical and experimental studies of wind environment in an urban morphology. Atmosph Environ2005; 39: 6147–6158.
5.
HangJSandbergMLiY. Effect of urban morphology on wind condition in idealized city models. Atmosph Environ2009; 43: 869–878.
6.
ZakiSAHagishimaATanimotoJ. Experimental study of wind-induced ventilation in urban building of cube arrays with various layouts. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2012; 103: 31–40.
7.
de Faria LC. Airflow in the urban environment. An evaluation of the relationship between urban aspect ratios and patterns of airflow, wind velocity and direction in urban areas, and coefficient of pressure distribution on building envelopes. PhD thesis, The Cardiff University, Cardiff, 2012.
8.
TheurerWBaeehlinWPlateEJ. Model study of the development of boundary layers above urban areas. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1992; 41–44: 437–448.
9.
Kastner-KleinPBerkowiczRBritterR. The influence of street architecture on flow and dispersion in street canyons. Meteorol Atmosph Phys2004; 87: 121–131.
10.
EliassonIOfferleBGrimmondCSB. Wind fields and turbulence statistics in an urban street canyon. Atmosph Environ2006; 40: 1–16.
11.
AmorimJHRodriguesVTavaresR. CFD modelling of the aerodynamic effect of trees on urban air pollution dispersion. Sci Total Environ2013; 641–642: 541–551.
12.
EndalewEMHertogMDeleleMA. CFD modelling and wind tunnel validation of airflow through plant canopies using 3D canopy architecture. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2009; 30: 256–368.
13.
XieXHuangZJiasongW. The impact of urban street layout on local atmospheric environment. Build Environ2006; 41: 1352–1363.
14.
XieXHuangZWangJS. Impact of building configuration on air quality in street canyon. Atmosph Environ2005; 39: 4519–4530.
15.
LeitlBMMeroneyRN. Car exhaust dispersion in a street canyon. Numerical critique of a wind tunnel experiment. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1997; 67–68: 293–304.
16.
HallDJWalkerSSpantonAM. Dispersion from courtyards and other enclosed spaces. Atmosph Environ1999; 33: 1187–1203.
17.
LeitlBMKastner-KleinPRauM. Concentration and flow distributions in the vicinity of U-shaped buildings: wind-tunnel and computational data. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1997; 67–69: 745–755.
18.
KimJJBaikJJ. A numerical study of the effects of ambient wind direction on flow and dispersion in urban street canyons using the RNG k–e turbulence model. Atmosph Environ2004; 38: 3039–3048.
19.
HangJSandbergMLiY. Age of air and air exchange efficiency in idealized city models. Build Environ2009; 44: 1714–1723.
20.
DepaulFTSheihCM. Measurements of wind velocities in a street canyon. Atmosph Environ1986; 20: 455–459.
21.
OkeTR. Street design and urban canopy layer climate. Energy Build1988; 11: 103–113.
22.
CookNJ. Technical note: on applying a general atmospheric simulation method to a particular urban site for AD-HOC wind loading or wind environment studies. Atmosph Environ1974; 8: 85–87.
23.
MemonRALeungDYC. On the heating environment in street canyon. Environ Fluid Mech2011; 11: 465–480.
24.
XieXHuangZJiasongW. The impact of solar radiation and street layout on pollutant dispersion in street canyon. Build Environ2005; 40: 201–212.
25.
MuhaisenAS. Shading simulation of the courtyard form in different climatic regions. Build Environ2006; 41: 1731–1741.
26.
YangXLiYYangL. Predicting and understanding temporal 3D exterior surface temperature distribution in an ideal courtyard. Build Environ2012; 57: 38–48.
27.
FirlagSZawadaB. Impacts of airflows, internal heat and moisture gains on accuracy of modelling energy consumption and indoor parameters in passive building. Energy Build2013; 64: 372–383.
28.
CorkeTCNagibHMTan-AtichatJ. Flow near a building model in a family of surface layers. J Ind Aerodyn1979; 5: 139–158.
29.
IyengarAKSFarellC. Experimental issues in atmospheric boundary layer simulations: roughness length and integral length scale determination. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2001; 89: 1059–1080.
30.
CounihanJ. Review paper. Adiabatic atmospheric boundary layers: a review and analysis of data from the period 1880–1972. Atmosph Environ1975; 9: 871–905.
31.
PatersonDAApeltCJ. Simulation of wind flow around three-dimensional buildings. Build Environ1989; 24: 39–50.
32.
MontazeriHBlockenB. CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: validation and sensitivity analysis. Build Environ2013; 60: 137–149.
33.
StathopoulosTBaskaranA. Boundary treatment for the computation of three-dimensional wind flow conditions around a building. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1990; 35: 177–200.
34.
ByrneCEIHoldoAE. Effects of increased geometric complexity on the comparison between computational and experimental simulations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1998; 73: 159–179.
35.
Li J and Ward IC. Developing computational fluid dynamics conditions for urban natural ventilation study. In: Proceedings: building simulation. Beijing, China: IBPSA, 2007, pp. 1090–1096.
36.
BaikJJKimJJFernandoHJS. A CFD model for simulating urban flow and dispersion. J Appl Meteorol Climatol2003; 42: 1636–1648.
37.
SalizzoniPvan LiefferingeRSoulhacL. Influence of wall roughness on the dispersion of a passive scalar in a turbulent boundary layer. Atmosph Environ2009; 43: 734–748.
38.
van HooffTBlockenB. Coupled urban wind flow and indoor natural ventilation modelling on a high-resolution grid: a case study for the Amsterdam Arena stadium. Environ Model Softw2010; 25: 51–65.
39.
CastroIPApsleyDD. Flow and dispersion over topography: a comparison between numerical and laboratory data for two-dimensional flows. Atmosph Environ1997; 31: 839–850.
40.
HargreavesDMWrightNG. On the use of the k–E model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2007; 95: 355–369.
41.
RichardsPJHoxeyRP. Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-E turbulence model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1993; 46–47: 145–153.
42.
LienaFSYeebEChengY. Simulation of mean flow and turbulence over a 2D building array using high-resolution CFD and a distributed drag force approach. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2004; 92: 117–158.
43.
YangYGuMChenS. New inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer in computational wind engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2009; 97: 88–95.
44.
LaunderBESpaldingDB. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1974; 3: 269–289.
45.
PatersonDAApeltCJ. Computation of wind flows over three-dimensional buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1986; 24: 193–213.
46.
CounehanJ. Wind tunnel determination of the roughness length as a function of the fetch and the roughness density of three-dimensional roughness elements. Atmosph Environ1971; 5: 637–642.
47.
SalizzoniPSoulhacLMejeanP. Street canyon ventilation and atmospheric turbulence. Atmosph Environ2009; 43: 5056–5067.
48.
SandbergM. What is ventilation efficiency?Build Environ1981; 16: 123–135.
49.
LinMHangJLiY. Quantitative ventilation assessments of idealized urban canopy layers with various urban layouts and the same building packing density. Build Environ2014; 79: 152–167.
50.
Padilla-Marcos MA, Feijó-Muñoz J and Meiss A. CFD procedure for obtaining patterns of the age of air in outdoor spaces surrounding a cube-shaped building in isothermal conditions. PhD thesis, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, 2014.
51.
YakhotVOrszagSA. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. Basic theory. J Scientific Comput1986; 1: 3–51.
52.
BaetkeFWernerH. Numerical simulation of turbulent flow over surface-mounted obstacles with sharp edges and corners. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1990; 35: 129–147.
53.
BlockenBStathopoulosTCarmelietJ. CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmosph Environ2007; 41: 238–252.
54.
IaccarinoGOoiADurbinPA. Reynolds averaged simulation of unsteady separated flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2003; 24: 147–156.
55.
JeongSJAndrewsMJ. Application of the k–e turbulence model to the high Reynolds number skimming flow field of an urban street canyon. Atmosph Environ2002; 36: 1137–1145.
56.
MoonenPDorerVCarmelietJ. Evaluation of the ventilation potential of courtyards and urban street canyons using RANS and LES. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2011; 99: 414–423.
57.
HertwigDEfthimiouGCBartzisJG. CFD-RANS model validation of turbulent flow in a semi-idealized urban canopy. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2012; 111: 61–72.
58.
MurakamiSMochidaAHayashiY. Examining the k-e model by means of a wind tunnel test and large-eddy simulation of the turbulence structure around a cube. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1990; 35: 87–100.
59.
HertwigDLeitlBSchatzmannM. Organized turbulent structures-Link between experimental data and LES. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2011; 99: 296–307.
60.
Walker RR, Shao L and Woolliscroft M. Natural ventilation via courtyards: theory & measurements. Proc. of the 14th AIVC Conference on Energy Impact of Ventilation and Air Infiltration. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1993, pp. 235–250.
61.
Shao L, Walker RR and Woolliscroft M. Natural ventilation via courtyards: the application of CFD, In: Proceedings of the 14th AIVC Conference on Energy Impact of Ventilation and Air Infiltration. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1993, pp. 393–403.
62.
Li J and Ward IC. Developing computational fluid dynamics conditions for urban natural ventilation study. In: Proceedings: building simulation, 2007.
63.
AhmadaKKharebMChaudhryKK. Wind tunnel simulation studies on dispersion at urban street canyons and intersections-a review. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2005; 93: 697–717.
64.
KimSEBoysanF. Application of CFD to environmental flows. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1999; 81: 145–158.
65.
WangZYPlateEJRauM. Scale effects in wind tunnel modelling. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1996; 61: 113–130.
66.
Hussain M and Lee BM. An investigation of wind forces on three dimensional roughness elements in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. Report no BS 56. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, AIVC, 1980.
67.
YamartinoRJWiegandG. Development and evaluation of simple models for the flow, turbulence and pollutant concentration fields within an urban street canyon. Atmosph Environ1986; 20: 2137–2156.
68.
MeroneyRNLeitlBMRafailidisS. Wind-tunnel and numerical modeling of flow and dispersion about several building shapes. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1999; 81: 333–345.
69.
AubrunSLeitlB. Unsteady characteristics of the dispersion process in the vicinity of a pig barn. Wind tunnel experiments and comparison with field data. Atmosph Environ2004; 38: 81–93.
70.
GartmannAFisterWSchwanghartW. CFD modelling and validation of measured wind field data in a portable wind tunnel. Aeolian Res2011; 3: 315–325.
71.
MurakamiSHayashiY. 3-D numerical simulation of airflow around a cubic model by means of the k-e model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1988; 31: 283–303.
72.
FarellCIyengarAKS. Experiments on the wind tunnel simulation of atmospheric boundary layers. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1999; 79: 11–35.
73.
SantiagoJLMartilliAMartínF. CFD simulation of airflow over a regular array of cubes. Part I: three-dimensional simulation of the flow and validation with wind-tunnel measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol2007; 122: 609–634.
74.
Fluent, Inc. FLUENT 6.1 User’s Guide. Lebanon, NH: Centerra Resource Park, 2003.
75.
SchatzmannMRafailidisSPavageauM. Some remarks on the validation of small-scale dispersion models with field and laboratory data. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1997; 67–68: 885–893.
