Is CO 2 a good proxy for indoor air quality in classrooms? Part 1: The interrelationships between thermal conditions,CO 2 levels,ventilation rates and selected indoor pollutants

Abstract

Current indoor air quality (IAQ) guidelines in school buildings are framed around thermal conditions, carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels and corresponding ventilation rates without considering specific indoor pollution levels. Drawing on detailed monitoring data from a sample of 18 classrooms from six London schools, the aim of this paper is to highlight behavioural and environmental factors that affect pollution levels in classrooms, and evaluate the adequacy of CO₂ as an overall predictor for IAQ using multilevel modelling. Together with elimination of indoor emission sources, keeping the temperatures below 26℃, and preferably below 22℃ depending on season, may limit total volatile organic compounds below thresholds associated with sensory irritations. The models suggested that after removing dust reservoirs from the classrooms, lowering average indoor CO₂ levels below 1000 ppm by increasing ventilation rates can limit indoor airborne particulate matter concentrations below recommended annual WHO 2010 guidelines. Uncontrolled infiltration rates may increase indoor NO₂ levels and microbial counts of fungal and bacterial groups, whose presence is associated with wet and moist materials. Overall, indoor CO₂ levels were a useful proxy for indoor investigations as they can prevent overheating, dilute pollutants with indoor sources and purge concentrations of airborne particles; however, they were a poor predictor of traffic related pollutants. Practical implications of the findings on the UK policy and building design industry are discussed.

Practical application : Driven by the growing population, and many years of intensive use, the UK building stock is in need of rapid expanding, extensive refurbishment and maintenance. However, local authorities lack the money for comprehensive and specialist renovations. The recommendations presented in this paper take into account specific needs and possibilities, and target building designers, engineers and occupants involved with daily operation and management of school buildings. Timely control of ventilation and heating systems, informed selection of construction materials, interior finishing and elimination of indoor sources may improve IAQ of school classrooms.

Keywords

Indoor air quality school classrooms carbon dioxide and ventilation rates temperatures volatile organic compounds particulate matter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide, 2006.

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: Selected pollutants, 2010.

DfE. Department for Education: Guidance on ventilation, thermal comfort and indoor air quality in schools, 2014.

Chatzidiakou L, Mumovic D, Summerfield AJ, et al. Indoor air quality in London schools. Part 1: Performance in use. Intell Build Int 2014; a.

Chatzidiakou L, Mumovic D, Summerfield AJ, et al. Indoor air quality in London schools. Part 2: Long-term integrated assessment. Intell Build Int 2014.

British Standard Institution. BS EN ISO 16000-1: 2006: Indoor air – Part 1: General aspects of sampling strategy. London: BSI, 2006.

British Standard Institution. BS EN ISO 7726: 2001: Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Instruments for measuring physical quantities. London: BSI, no. 1, 2001.

British Standard Institution. BS EN ISO 16000- 26:2012: Indoor air - Part 26: Sampling strategy for carbon dioxide (CO2). London: BSI, 2012.

Beisteiner

Coley

. Carbon dioxide levels and summertime ventilation rates in UK schools. Int J Vent 2002; 1(3): 181–188.

10.

Mumovic

Palmer

Davies

. Winter indoor air quality, thermal comfort and acoustic performance of newly built secondary schools in England. Build Environ 2009; 44(7): 1466–1477.

11.

British Standard Institution. BS EN ISO 16017-2: 2012: Indoor, ambient and workplace air - Sampling and analysis of volatile organic compounds by sorbent tube / thermal desorption / capillary gas chromatography, London: BSI, 2012.

12.

British Standard Institution. BS ISO 16000 - 4: 2011: Indoor air - Part 4: Determination of formaldehyde-Diffusive sampling method, London: BSI, 2011.

13.

British Standard Institution. BS EN 13528-3: 2003: Ambient air quality - Diffusive samplers for the determination of concentrations of gases and vapours - Requirements and test methods, London: BSI, 2003.

14.

British Standard Institution. BS EN ISO 16000-15: 2008: Indoor air - Part 15: Sampling strategy for nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), London: BSI, 2008.

15.

Ozden

Döğeroğlu

. Performance evaluation of a tailor-made passive sampler for monitoring of tropospheric ozone. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2012; 19(8): 3200–3209.

16.

Rintala

Nevalainen

. Quantitative measurement of streptomycetes using real-time PCR. J Environ Monit 2006; 8(7): 745–749.

17.

Cabral

. Can we use indoor fungi as bioindicators of indoor air quality? Historical perspectives and open questions. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408(20): 4285–4295.

18.

World Health Organization. Dampness and mould. WHO Regional Office Europe, 2009.

19.

Torvinen

Meklin

Torkko

. Mycobacteria and fungi in moisture-damaged building materials. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72(10): 6822–6824.

20.

Hyvarinen

Meklin

Vepsalainen

. Fungi and actinobacteria in moisture-damaged building materials — concentrations and diversity. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2002; 49(1): 27–37.

21.

Peugh

. A practical guide to multilevel modeling. J Sch Psychol 2010; 48(1): 85–112.

22.

Dedrick

Ferron

Hess

. Multilevel modeling: A review of methodological issues and applications. Rev Educ Res 2009; 79(1): 69–102.

23.

Stegmueller

. How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Am J Pol Sci 2013; 57(3): 748–761.

24.

Raudenbush SW and Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.

25.

Wang J, Xie H and Fisher JH. Multilevel models: Applications using SAS, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2011.

26.

Chatzidiakou L, Mumovic D and Summerfield AJ. What do we know about indoor air quality in school classrooms? A critical review of the literature. Intell Build Int 2012; October: 37–41.

27.

Singer

. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat 1998; 23(4): 323–355.

28.

Branis

Rezácová

Domasová

. The effect of outdoor air and indoor human activity on mass concentrations of PM(10), PM(2.5), and PM(1) in a classroom. Environ Res 2005; 99(2): 143–149.

29.

Weichenthal

Dufresne

Infante-Rivard

. Characterizing and predicting ultrafine particle counts in Canadian classrooms during the winter months: Model development and evaluation. Environ Res 2008; 106(3): 349–360.

30.

Goyal

Khare

. Indoor–outdoor concentrations of RSPM in classroom of a naturally ventilated school building near an urban traffic roadway. Atmos Environ 2009; 43(38): 6026–6038.

31.

Patel

Chillrud

Correa

. Spatial and temporal variations in traffic-related particulate matter at New York city high schools. Atmos Environ 2009; 43(32): 4975–4981.

32.

Foarde

Berry

. Comparison of biocontaminant levels associated with hard vs. carpet floors in nonproblem schools: Results of a year long study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004; 14(Suppl 1): S41–S48.

33.

Smedje

Norback

. Irritants and allergens at school in relation to furnishing and cleaning. Indoor Air 2001; 11: 127–133.

34.

Arbes

Sever

Mehta

. Exposure to indoor allergens in day-care facilities: Results from two North Carolina counties. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 116(1): 133–139.

35.

Heudorf

Neitzert

Spark

. Particulate matter and carbon dioxide in classrooms - the impact of cleaning and ventilation. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2009; 212(1): 45–55.

36.

Poupard

Blondeau

Iordache

. Statistical analysis of parameters influencing the relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality in schools. Atmos Environ 2005; 39(11): 2071–2080.

37.

Scheff

Paulius

Curtis

. Indoor air quality in a middle school, Part II: Development of emission factors for particulate matter and bioaerosols. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2000; 15(11): 835–842.

38.

Fromme

Twardella

Dietrich

. Particulate matter in the indoor air of classrooms-exploratory results from Munich and surrounding area. Atmos Environ 2007; 41(4): 854–866.

39.

Godwin

Batterman

. Indoor air quality in Michigan schools. Indoor Air 2007; 17(2): 109–121.

40.

Adgate

Church

Ryan

. Outdoor, indoor, and personal exposure to VOCs in children. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112(14): 1386–1392.

41.

Geiss

Giannopoulos

Tirendi

. The AIRMEX study - VOC measurements in public buildings and schools/kindergartens in eleven European cities: Statistical analysis of the data. Atmos Environ 2011; 45(22): 3676–3684.

42.

Banerjee

Annesi-Maesano

. Spatial variability of indoor air pollutants in schools. A multilevel approach. Atmos Environ 2012; 61: 558–561.

43.

Zhang

Zhao

Nordquist

. The prevalence and incidence of sick building syndrome in Chinese pupils in relation to the school environment: A two-year follow-up study. Indoor Air 2011; 21(6): 462–471.

44.

Barrett

Zhang

Moffat

. A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Build Environ 2013; 59: 678–689.

45.

Blondeau

Iordache

Poupard

. Relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality in eight French schools. Indoor Air 2005; 15(1): 2–12.

46.

Van Roosbroeck

Jacobs

Janssen

NAH

. Long-term personal exposure to PM2.5, soot and NOx in children attending schools located near busy roads: A validation study. Atmos Environ 2007; 41(16): 3381–3394.